Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Group(s): Add to My Group
January 29, 2008 at 09:12:06

View Ratings | Rate It

Conyers Tells Rob Kall: Impeachment Not Off the Table; A You Tube Video

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Rob Kall (about the author)     Page 3 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Rob Kall: Is there anything that could happen that would change your mind?

John Conyers: Sure. There are plenty of things that could happen. And it's not off the table.

Rob Kall: It's not? That's good to hear.

John Conyers: Well that's why we're talking.

Rob Kall:
Thank you.

Conyer's aide: Now the congressman has got to get back...

 

I must say that I have enormous respect for congressman Conyers. He didn't have to have the conversation and, like Matt Stoller, said, he's intensely interested in this. He is THE key factor in what could be a huge turning point in history. His refusal to proceed is perplexing though. I don't buy the argument that the concern about the Republicans attacking the action is holding HIM back. It might be enough to worry some the more invertebrate members of congress, but not Conyers.

On the contrary, I believe that if spun intelligently, taking the approach could dramatically help the Democrats in the 2008 elections. Conyers should take the position that Bush and Cheney have forced the house judiciary committee to use impeachment hearings as a last resort, because the whitehouse admin refused to obey, or allow appointees to obey conventional congressional subpoenas. Executive privilege can not be used in response to impeachment hearing subpoenas.

Perhaps my conversation with Conyers allowed him to tip off the whitehouse that there is more at stake than just saying no to the subpoenas already issued to Harriet Meiers and others. If so, I'm happy to be of help.

One thing seems clear. John Conyers is VERY aware of his place in history, the power we wields. The response from Bush to the Meiers subpoena will come soon. These are clearly very high stakes exchanges.

George Bush has been very concerned about his pathetic legacy, and it seems, he faces going down rather ignominiously in history. But John Conyers turns 80 in May. My guess he is contemplating how history regards him. There is still time to pursue the serial impeachment of constitutional and war criminals Dick Cheney and George Bush. I'm hoping that we will soon see that John Conyers has dotted his 'i''s and crossed his 't's to his satisfaction, and, having gone through all the proper procedures, so history gives him credit for giving Cheney and Bush a chance to work with the system and then giving them enough rope to hang themselves.

When Conyers says "There must be some compelling reason I'm not doing it right now, perhaps he has plans that are time sensitive. Perhaps when dealing with taking down the most powerful man in the world, who is a rogue killer, torturer, liar, you don't tip your hand. Perhaps you wait until the time is right and then spring your assault. How many people do you think Bush/Cheney would, if they could get away with it, KILL, to prevent hearings? So don't be so glib and quick to condemn Mr. Conyers yet. If, by the end of the 110th congress, he's done nothing, feel free, and history will surely look poorly upon his legacy. But now, the time is far too premature.

I've written about this many times before. Investigations of Agnew led to his resignation. Impeachment hearings of Nixon, which did not stop the work of congress, led to disclosures, confessions and discoveries that led a group of Republican senators to take "THE WALK" to the whitehouse, to inform Nixon that he must resign or face their cooperation in his impeachment.

History will recapitulate this series of events. Cheney will be investigated, and in short order, develop a "medical excuse" so he gets a note from the doctor that he needs to resign. Bush will appoint a vice president who the Dems in congress can live with, one who will not run for office-- probably a senior leader, like John Warner, James Baker, or maybe Bush will take advantage of the opportunity to make a minor correction to his legacy and appoint a black, woman or latino, or a native American (Senator Akaka has introduced legislation that would give native, indigenous Hawaiians the same right as Native American Indians. )

Then, hearings will continue against Bush. Just as history has taught us with the Agnew, Nixon and Gonzales hearings, lower level appointees will testify, provide evidence, then higher level appointees and ultimately, the ugly truth will lead to Mitch McConnell leading THE WALK to the whitehouse, informing Bush that the Republican party will be demolished for decades if Bush does not resign.

But timing is VERY important. I posted this as a comment below, but I want to be sure it is seen:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "Bush Reasons To"
Inside the Mind of George W. Bush: 119 Reasons to Vote Barack Obama in 2008
by Molasses Jones

$19.99

Number of pages: 244
Publisher: BookSurge Publishing

50 Reasons Not to Vote for Bush
by Robert Sterling

$9.95
Lowest New Price $2.49

Number of pages: 201
Publisher: Feral House

50 Reasons Not to Vote for Bush
by Robert Sterling

$3.95

Number of pages: 201
Publisher: Robert Sterling/Feral House

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
115 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Reaction by tjb on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:31:53 AM
Rob by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:33:42 AM
wrong by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:01:43 AM
You're glad he's running the Judiciary Committee! by Crystal Purcell on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:22:18 PM
THERE IS ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE, VOTE THIRD PARTY by rhalfhill on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 6:18:31 AM
Ha! here's where we disagree Rob! by Gregory Wonderwheel on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:28:42 PM
Thank you for pointing that out! by Nadia on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 6:08:05 PM
Conyers was NOT drunk and NOT incoherent by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 8:58:20 PM
KENYA SHOWS RESULTS OF STEALING ELECTIONS by rhalfhill on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 6:40:10 AM
Brettp, your questions are well intentioned, but by Gregory Wonderwheel on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:43:31 PM
Greg, a response to further understanding and refine focus by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:45:17 AM
Really Confused by Pixie on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:00:43 AM
Pixie Please DO act on your emotion and contact Conyers. by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:51:13 AM
Tragecy and Hope by Mark Watterson on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:34:08 AM
Thanks for the confrontation by Michael Fury on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:39:35 AM
Re: Conyers Tells Rob Kall: Impeachment Not Off the Table by Munich on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:11:27 PM
Rob by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:09:11 PM
We're Inadvertently Giving Congresspeople Too Much Power by Kathryn Smith on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:14:45 PM
Off the Table by Bill Cain on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:16:02 PM
dump the incumbents, conyers is a shmuck by Better World Order on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:22:56 PM
It couldn't be more clear by Kathlyn Stone on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:27:03 PM
Well, thanks, folks by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:34:56 PM
You remind me of Dick Cheney. by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:06:07 PM
Buffalo Springfield by tjb on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:40:02 PM
Damn Rob, by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:40:52 PM
...... by Tony Forest on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:41:22 PM
Great job Rob. by GeoRip on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:57:04 PM
I agree on all counts by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:08:30 PM
frustration by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 3:22:35 PM
He asked Fielding for a response by Nov 9. What happened? by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:59:30 AM
Rep. Conyers: We got your back by JonmarkP on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 5:03:29 PM
I too was impressed by your demeanor by Gregory Wonderwheel on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:23:30 PM
....uncivil talk... by Crystal Purcell on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:20:34 PM
Some IF's by Charlie L on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:58:28 PM
Who got the idea: Public image is sacrificed by impeaching? by Kathryn Smith on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:05:52 PM
Conyers confirms Washington elitist mentality by Steve Slocum on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:16:12 PM
Case in point ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 8:15:44 PM
This is very important by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:16:41 PM
I have employees, and also professionals by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:34:09 PM
Well, actually by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:46:19 PM
one issue jugments by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 3:19:56 PM
significant, but... by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:02:32 PM
Run the table; in "pool hall" parlance by boomerang on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:14:05 PM
WE THE PEOPLE HAVE NO GOVERNMENT by RICHARD SHADE on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:31:13 PM
Impeachment by Tony Forest on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 2:37:04 PM
Conyers by Peter Wedlund on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:00:15 PM
I second the motion by Tom Chechatka on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:28:59 PM
Does the video work? by Kevin Gosztola on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:25:25 PM
It's working for me. Try rebooting by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:52:40 PM
Thank you for your good work in gathering this intelligence by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:27:43 PM
All the powers-that-be prefer business as usual. by Christie on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:08:17 AM
Maybe that is coming Christie by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 2:18:33 AM
Sometimes I really wonder . . . by Dana Pico on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:34:45 PM
because by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:39:50 PM
regarding by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:44:50 PM
Sorry Dana, not your fantasy scenario by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:49:27 PM
Rob, I agree with what you say; but you DON'T SAY ENOUGH by meremark on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 6:49:50 PM
ANTHRAX by RICHARD SHADE on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 2:27:53 AM
dems and republicans by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 5:29:08 PM
A practical question by Dana Pico on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 4:36:54 PM
January 16th by Kevin Gosztola on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 5:29:20 PM
You answered a not unreasonable question by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 6:13:28 PM
As the World turns, by john riggs on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 5:55:59 PM
Some things are black and white and are not opinion by Kathryn Smith on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 6:05:45 PM
Yep. It's a matter of life and death by Kathlyn Stone on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 7:52:04 PM
Well put ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:08:40 PM
Why Conyers SHOULD start impeachment procedings. by michal54 on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 6:21:29 PM
Sharp As A Sack Of Ballpeen Hammers by Rick Mason on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 6:45:32 PM
I'm under 60, but find your comments offensive by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:40:18 PM
Reasons to Conyers dilemmna by Dom Jermano on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 8:51:35 PM
To close to the forest to see the trees by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:12:19 PM
nixon timeline.... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:42:47 PM
So, what about the following excerpt from Holtzman's piece?? by michal54 on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:51:04 AM
Holzman is smart. But Nixon was a single impeachment by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:23:45 PM
That's it? by Mr M on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:02:40 AM
I would encourage everyone to watch the video by SpiritBlooms on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:16:13 PM
video by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:37:58 PM
Conyers, Slimier and Slippier than an Eel!!! by Maher Osseiran on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:41:41 PM
the most LAME excuses EVER... by Ben Marble, M.D. on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:53:18 PM
Impeachment IS off the table by August Adams on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:59:08 PM
"Impeachment IS off the table" so speak out! by Gary Boutell on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:15:56 AM
btw Awesome job Rob! by Ben Marble, M.D. on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:00:20 PM
This is typical by Timothy V. Gatto on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:18:01 PM
Outraged! by Crystal Purcell on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:31:43 PM
actually by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:41:01 PM
Interview with John Conyers by via on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:48:50 PM
Protecting poss. "black prez"? Obama re impeachment; ETC. by 2yoginijewels on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:50:14 PM
Uncle Bob by tjb on Tuesday, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:23:05 PM
Conyers 80 years of what? by Dom Jermano on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:02:55 AM
Poker by tjb on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 5:58:41 AM
Let me give you a Poke. by Dom Jermano on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:55:07 PM
Well Done by davy on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 3:45:15 AM
Off the Table by laurie dobson on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 4:18:26 AM
A Word or Two About Grounds by Sam Adams on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 5:20:13 AM
if by Cheryl Biren on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:07:42 AM
"What would they be" by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:56:05 AM
btw by Cheryl Biren on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:09:12 AM
Election is already lost ... by Mr M on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 9:31:25 AM
Impeachment will go forward. by Dom Jermano on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:48:28 PM
Re: A Word or Two About Grounds by SpiritBlooms on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 2:48:06 PM
IMPEACHMENT THE ANSWER TO OBSTRUCTIONISM OF CONYERS, ETC by rhalfhill on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 5:46:59 AM
on the table....off the table... by Ben Marble, M.D. on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 6:03:41 AM
ben by Cheryl Biren on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:10:49 AM
Mr. Kall, next time you see Conyers, put this in his hand. by Michael Fury on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:32:16 AM
Compelling Reasons by Stephen Demetriou on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:38:32 AM
the election is coming up quick by tjb on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:27:17 AM
I don't get you. by Gregory Wonderwheel on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:18:27 PM
Public servants by amazin on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:11:41 AM
Counter Campaign by Cheryl Biren on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:20:29 AM
Thank You Sir. May I Have Another? by Roy Murtishaw on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 2:14:34 PM
Well, his may be bigger than mine by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 4:29:38 PM
Rob you had him nailed and so he dodged. by Gregory Wonderwheel on Wednesday, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:13:53 PM
Rob got him on the record. by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:28:58 PM
Why Do Americans Vote the Way They Do? by GatorVol on Friday, Feb 8, 2008 at 9:23:52 PM
Choosing Battles and Timing? by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Feb 9, 2008 at 1:27:07 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum