Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   News 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 12/19/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

GROUND ZERO ON WALL STREET: FED FUNDS AND T-BILLS HIT 0% INTEREST

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (98 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

 

It is not a federal agency but it should be, because we the people are picking up the tab.  The Fed and the banks are creating $8 trillion out of thin air, nearly doubling the money supply; and that means the value of our dollars is being diluted by nearly 50%.  If it is our money, we should get the interest, have the right to full accountability, and have control over where the money goes.   Instead of pouring money into a massive black hole on the derivatives books of bankrupt banks, Congress could and should be using the national credit card to bolster manufacturing, housing and infrastructure development, either by making low-interest credit readily available to qualified borrowers or by a direct infusion of government-issued dollars into the economy. 

 

The objection to the government printing dollars and simply spending them on public projects has always been that it would be inflationary, but that alternative would actually be less inflationary than letting the privately-owned Federal Reserve print dollars and swap them for U.S. debt, as is being done now.  This is because Treasury debt, once created, is never paid off.  The U.S. federal debt hasn’t been paid off since the days of Andrew Jackson.  Instead, U.S. government securities wind up circulating in the economy along with the dollars that were printed to buy them.  These securities represent a claim against U.S. goods and services just as dollars do.  Indeed, that is why the government’s securities are so highly valued: they are just as good as dollars.  They can be cashed in at any time for their dollar equivalent or deposited and borrowed against for an equivalent sum in loans, and they can be swapped for the risker toxic collateral that is tying up the banks’ capital, preventing the banks from making new loans.  Federal securities are particularly valuable to banks, because they can become the “reserves” for generating many times their face value in new loans.  If the government were to print dollars directly, the bonds would be taken out of the picture.  There would be debt-free, permanent money in circulation, money not subject to perpetual servicing with interest by the taxpayers.

 

Banking with the U.S. Government

 

The superior safety and security that investors feel when they stash their savings with the U.S. government could be achieved by nationalizing bankrupt banks.  This is not a radical idea.  Rather than being bailed out with taxpayer money, insolvent banks are actually supposed to be put into receivership under the FDIC (a government agency).  It then has the option of taking the bank’s stock (effectively nationalizing it) in return for getting the bank back on its feet.  This was done, for example, with Continental Illinois, the nation’s fourth largest bank, when it went bankrupt in the 1990s. 

 

In a number of capitalist countries, including Switzerland and India, publicly-owned banks operate right alongside privately-owned banks.  Studies in India comparing public and private banks have found that Indian public banks not only are more secure but give superior customer service.10  In European countries, working for the government is considered more prestigious than working for the private sector, and government employees have better training.  Interestingly, the first banks owned publicly in democratic communities were established in the American colonies.  It may be time to return to our roots and restore the U.S. banking system to public ownership again.        



1          “US Rate Futures Spike as Fed Sets Low Funds Target Range,” Reuters (December 16, 2008).

2.          Tom Petruno, “Safety Outweighs Negative Yield for Some T-bill Investors,” Los Angeles Times (December 10, 2008); “Treasurys Higher as Bad News Creeps in,” MarketWatch (December 9, 2008).

3.          See Chicago Federal Reserve, Modern Money Mechanics (1961, last revised 1992), originally produced and distributed free by the Public Information Center of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, now available on the Internet.
.          Mark Felsenthal, “Bailout Bill Gives Fed New Tool to Boost Liquidity,” Reuters (October 3, 2008).

 

5.          Scott Lanman, Vivien Lou Chen, “Bernanke Says Fed May Buy Treasuries to Aid Economy,” Bloomberg News (December 1, 2008).   

6.          Jim Puzzanghera, “Bailout: Pay Now, Worry Later,” Los Angeles Times (November 30, 2008).           

7           See Ellen Brown, “Oops, We Meant $7 Trillion!”, www.webofdebt.com/articles (November 30, 2008).

8          Mark Pittam, “Fed Refused to Disclose Recipients of $2 Trillion,” Bloomberg News (December 12, 2008).

9          “Bloomberg Picks a Fight With the Federal Reserve,” The Prudent Investor (November 9, 2008).

 

10.       “State Bank of India Ranks Highest in Consumer Satisfaction,” J.D. Power Asia Pacific Reports (2001); Nirmal Chandra, “Is Inclusive Growth Feasible in Neoliberal India?”,  networkideas.org (September 2008).

 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Ellen Brown is an attorney, president of the Public Banking Institute, and author of 11 books. Her websites are http://WebofDebt.com, http://EllenBrown.com, and http://PublicBankingInstitute.org. In her latest book, "Web of Debt: The Shocking (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
public ownership of financial system by Kuzminski on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:02:43 PM
populist solution by Ellen Brown on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:19:17 PM
On nationalizing the banks by Kuzminski on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:13:12 PM
public ownership of financial system by Kuzminski on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:56:57 PM
movement by Ellen Brown on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:59:51 PM
End the Federal Reserve by ronheri on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:30:55 PM
And as with the French Revolution, by richard on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:33:39 AM
From Freedom to Fascism by Munich on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:15:09 PM
Interest free better than debt by John Médaille on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:59:45 PM
Stick 'em Up! by Tom Chechatka on Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:48:59 AM
No Surprises! by Rick Armin on Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:34:15 PM
No Surprises! by Rick Armin on Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:38:22 PM
Sorry! by Rick Armin on Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:40:46 AM
Start a movement for grassroot banks by Martin Carbone on Sunday, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:46:56 PM