Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment, 2 series

General News

Accompanying vs Organizing as a Mode of Activism and Change: Transcript of an interview with Staughton Lynd; Part 2

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 3/14/13

Become a Fan
  (294 fans)
- Advertisement -

And the Pope said "Well, Mr. Romero, I am directing you to create a better relationship with the government of El Salvador." 

So, (laughs), that was no longer encouragement from the top.

Rob Kall:   Yes.  And you say a page later in your book that you came away from this struggle with another conviction as well, that "Only local unions, not any national union, or federation of national unions, could be looked to for visionary energy and seeds of change."

Staughton Lynd:   That's right.  There was such a local union, at least one, here in Youngstown when we first came.  It was Local 1462 of the Steelworkers.  Above the union hall were written the words "Home of the Rank and File."  The two men on account of whom my wife and I moved to Youngstown were President and Vice-President of the Local, and they put up a fight, but they lost.  The mill closed, and we weren't able to re-open it. 

Rob Kall:   So, you're basically saying there are big problems with centralized unions and centralized activism, is that part of what you're saying about accompanying?

Staughton Lynd:   Yes.

Rob Kall:   Then there's hierarchy as well.  Where does that fit in with accompanying?

Staughton Lynd:   Obviously, the kind of self-organization that people create when they're in involved in a struggle that's built from below is likely to be a circle of people in which decisions, as much as possible, are made by consensus in which no one gets paid if they're paid at all much more than anyone else, and so forth.  That is the kind of organization that, according to my research, and oral histories, and documents I've consulted, existed in the early and middle 1930s in the Labor Movement in this country.  I think we've all had moments in our lives when we've been part of such a thing. 

- Advertisement -

In the South, in the Civil Rights Movement, Stokely Carmichael says in his autobiography that "Consensus was not a Middle-Class fad, consensus was the natural thing to do when the consequences of your decision might get somebody killed"; and nobody was going to let that decision be made by another person for them.  So I feel that both the early Labor movement in the 30s, and the Civil Rights movement in the deep South, especially in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, had this horizontal character.  It was only when people entered into deals, gave away the right to strike, etc., etc., that you began to have -- you can describe it many ways -- but a simple way to describe a labor organization of the kind I have in mind is, nobody wants to go back to the plant floor, and so they brown-nose whoever is above them in the hierarchy, and when that person moves on, they entertain the hope of moving up.

Rob Kall:   "Nobody wants to go back to the plant floor, and so they try to rise in the hierarchy," eh? 

Staughton Lynd:   You got it.

Rob Kall:   I need to do a station ID.

This is the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, WNJC 1360 AM sponsored by Opednews.com.  I've been speaking with Staughton Lynd.  He's been an activist for fifty-some [50+] years.  He's the author of Accompanying: Pathways to Social change.  We've been speaking about his experience since the time when he was director of Freedom Schools in the 1964 Mississippi Freedom Summer. 

- Advertisement -

You have a quote, Staughton, in your book, that I think really nails some of the problems of current activists:  "Too often, Left intellectuals gather together and ask each other, 'Now, how can we attract workers?'  When workers show up, they're a minority.  The culture and vocabulary of the meeting have already been established by Middle Class Conveners, and the workers soon leave."  I have seen this!  I'm not just a radio host, I'm an activist, and I've seen this happen: where you've got a whole bunch of people who are making six figures talking about how to help all the people who are out of work, or out of health insurance -- that doesn't work.  I think it gets back to accompanying.  If you want to help people you have to go to them!  That's what you're saying at the core.

Staughton Lynd:   We had an entity in Youngstown that we called "The Workers' Solidarity Club," which functioned as a parallel Central Labor Union, and by that I mean this:  in every community there is a so-called Central Labor Body in which there are delegates from all over the union scene in that particular community.  But because the whole bureaucratic apparatus has got arterial sclerosis, that's also true of the central labor body, which is supposed to give strike support.  The strike starts in July, and by the time you get any help from the central labor body, snow is falling. 

So our idea was, "Well, we don't have a lot of money, we don't (initially at least) have a lot of people, but: we are going to create a time and a place where workers who are on strike, or an individual who feels that he or she has been unjustly discharged, can come and get help."  And we did that.  We had no bylaws, we had no officers, we had no dues, and we won some pretty big strikes in the Youngstown area, the Mahoning Valley of Northeast Ohio; so I don't think I'm just blowing smoke, or talking about something that I haven't experienced.  I think I'm talking about something people can do if they want to enough.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project. 

Rob Kall Wikipedia Page

Over 200 podcasts are archived for downloading here, or can be accessed from iTunes. Rob is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Rob is, with Opednews.com the first media winner of the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver