Back in the 1960s Douglas McGregor at the MIT Sloan School of Management developed a model of human motivation that became known as Theory X and Theory Y. This model has been extensively used in human resource management, and organizational behavior and development. Let 's apply the theory to religion and belief systems such as politics. Certainly, what I am about to present represents idealized positions and, in reality, every belief system can probably be said to contain elements of both Theory X and Theory Y. At the risk of simplification, allow me to apply Theory X and Theory Y to religion and organized belief systems as a whole.
In management, theory X holds that people are basically lazy, self-serving and avoid all work if they can. Hence, management needs to strictly manage to make sure the workers don 't goof-off. A very complex control structure needs to be implemented and closely monitored because at any point, shiftless humans can corrupt the system. The system must remain pure, which requires strict enforcement of the many rules and regulations that must be literally interpreted and vigorously enforced. Legalism is a term often used for this approach, where the literal word is more important than the spirit of the law.
Theory X belief systems promote a culture of purity that prides itself on being superior over the impure, which is often anyone not a part of the organized belief system. Theory X also holds that since humans are basically impure that they cannot have a direct relationship with the Creator. That is why there must be a system of purification which is only obtained by rigorous adherence to the specified system of conceptualization and a well-defined system of practice intended to demonstrate loyalty to the given belief system. Adherents need to talk the official spin and walk the official walk. The role of authority is to control the impure. Impurity includes thoughts, words and deeds that go against the official position.
Again, remembering that I am speaking in idealistic terms, Theory Y has a far more optimistic view of humans. In management, this theory views people as aspiring to responsibility and wanting to achieve high standards. People are held to be basically good, and to have creative and spiritual desires which, when allowed free expression and provided the proper nurturing, lead to personal fulfillment and betterment of the common good. This viewpoint holds that people tend to do bad things out of ignorance, fear or greed. Religious proponents of Theory Y hold that people are basically good and that if given the right opportunities and shown the right understanding, love and guidance that even the worst people can be redeemed if they so desire.
Whereas Theory X extremists insist on man 's basic state of wickedness, Theory Y proponents believe that humanity was created in the Divine image and that our consciences reflect that image. The law is written in our hearts according to this optimistic viewpoint. We seek to do good because that is our basic nature, according to Theory Y.
Extreme Theory Y religion also holds that no one or system of belief has all the answers, even Theory Y. Hence, we need to be tolerant and considerate of other viewpoints. As no belief and opinion is sacrosanct, Theory Y is optimistic that the truth does set us free while ideology merely binds us. Theory Y believes truth is more important than our beliefs, concepts and conditioning and that truth has to be sought objectively and rationally. Thus, Theory Y religion is willing to objectively consider findings of science, even those which lend credence to claims that humans are inherently good.
Theory Y is so optimistic as to believe that in accordance with the freedom God gave us, each individual is free to choose how they conceptualize and believe in a Supreme Being. None of us has a perfect conceptualization of God and Theory Y holds that it is most dangerous to think that one does.
Finally, as I earlier said, these are extreme idealizations and in reality every religion and belief system appears to contain elements of both approaches. As to which Jesus was, what would you say: more an optimistic Theory Y proponent or a negative Theory X advocate?
Powered by Qumana