75 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Security as it relates to George DW, DW for Dead Wrong

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   No comments
Message jack bard
A previous article summarized how George W was wrong on every thing, enough so that a recommendation was made to change his moniker from George W to George D.W, DW for dead wrong. He is referred to as DW in this security related article as well. A grade is assigned to each addressed issue--a one person grading system at work.

--Afghanistan C-

Attacking Afghanistan after 9/11 was a no-brainer (Clinton had such plans after the Cole attack, but the needed basing rights in Uzbekistan was not allowed until after 9/11). Then, after defeating the Taliban and killing or capturing much of al Qaeda, DW blew it when he pulled out early as he charged off to an Iraq fiasco--a great gift and relief for the terrorists.

But during that short war, too few troops let bin Laden escape at Tora Bora. He was monitored on the airways there talking to his followers as he apologized for their predicament. But, we had too few troops at Tora Bora (60 or so). More troops (700) were requested by the team leader there. CIA's Hank Crumpton personally asked DW for the troops. No response, so bin Laden escaped.

Promised infrastructure building was slight allowing Afghanistan to morph into a narcostate providing money for the terrorists. President Karzai, our good ally, plans to leave due to his reconstruction related drop in popularity. Now the Taliban is resurging. The Iraqi insurgence has shown the Taliban the way--a feedback from the Iraq fiasco.

--Iraq F-

Invading Iraq is seen as a monumental blunder of historic proportions. Beyond leaving Afghanistan too soon, the adventure weakened us from every viewpoint. Now we're stuck there without a good way out. When stuck in the mud, arguments may arise about how to get out, but then, eventually, the question has to be asked, "What fool got us stuck here in the first place?"

It is believed that our invasion of Afghanistan was part of the al Qaeda plan, that we would get stuck, humiliated and then driven out as the Russians were, but it didn't work. Rather we got stuck in Iraq. There the gains made in Afghanistan were more than trumped with our losses in Iraq.

It was reported by Muslims themselves that the moderate Muslim majority is shrinking in response to Iraq and the Israeli conflicts. That corresponds to the comprehensive April National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) leak in the late news. Now, as we know, the NIE states that the terrorists numbers have been expanding, that Iraq is now a terrorist recruiting ground with a new generation of Jihadist emerging--making us less safe. DW had to know of that important report. His hard line since April though has been that we are safer--his major strategy going into the mid-terms.

--Iran F

DW passed on an opportunity to calm Iran when he refused to talk with them in '02. DW then included Iran in his "Axis of Evil" speech just prior to invading Iraq--an implied threat that further stimulated Iran's taste for the nuclear. He did his best to aggravate a country that sponsors terrorism and in all probability is pursuing a nuclear bomb.

We know the Iranian people have a favorable opinion of the U.S. people in general and are unhappy with their government. They need help to dump the clerics and President whatshisname. But then, DW is all about tough talk and gives little thought to hearts and minds--the only way to win in the long run.

DW's line has been that he would talk to Iran only after they quit their enrichment program--no middle ground, hence, no discussions as Iran charges on with its enrichment program.

--N. Korea F

DW alienated Kim further in '02 when he accused Kim of enriching uranium and breaking previous agreements. Then DW included N. Korea in his "Axis of Evil" speech just prior to invading Iraq--an implied threat that motivated Kim to speed up his nuclear bomb program--and Kim is an arms merchant, His store is open to the terrorists as they stroll by with our oil money.

DW's line has been that he would talk to Kim only after he quits arming--no middle ground, hence no discussions as Kim keeps his nuclear lines humming.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Jack Bard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I am a retired engineer who has a bit of a problem with George W
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Security as it relates to George DW, DW for Dead Wrong

Down The Drain:How Lack of Contractor Oversight Is Throwing Our Money Away

George D.W, DW for dead wrong, Bush, a review of his domestic policies

So Which Is Best, Increase The Supply Of Oil Or Cut The Demand? Well, What About Both

George D. W. "Dead Wrong" Bush; A review of GWB's failed policies

Mary Tyler Moore's Effort To Promote Stem Cell Research

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend