Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Fixing Healthcare: the answer lies in our past

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   2 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Gustav Wynn
Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
How did America's health care mess get so bad? The answer is greed, obviously. There has been great wealth created for healthcare conglomerates, drug companies, lobbyists, and in a less direct manner, politicians who benefit from the support of these firms. Though most doctors make a higher then average living, I would say that in general they earn it without exploiting anyone. But the answer to our problem lies in our past. I remember about 25-30 years ago when healthcare was provided by smaller, local practitioners.

Now, Americans are paying our doctors and hospitals for their services through a middleman profiteer who extracts huge sums, lining the skies of Hartford with hi-rise office complexes, as well as the coffers of Joe Lieberman and others.

Of all the things our society pays for out of pocket, medical care should be the last thing we allow to be marked up. But it's "business" as usual in modern politics, and legislators either suckle off these enormous lobbies or fear them (I excuse only Rep. Dennis Kucinich from this), with their campaign war chests, and big bucks to spend pimping friendly candidates, or sliming opponents. You might remember the "Harry and Louise" ad campaign from the early 90s, portraying a fictitious "average" couple, critical of a nationalized plan. But neither Harry and Louise nor Bill and Hillary mentioned the simpler alternative that was in place two decades before.

It all started years ago, when businesses began to offer their workers health insurance. My father's policy was offered through his job as a benefit, at a paltry $25 per YEAR covering hospitalizations. That was when it really was INSURANCE, as opposed to 'coverage'.

So, what took place? Abuse. Everybody started making claims, trying to get more out than they put in. Insurance companies were happy to comply, allowing more and more procedures be covered. They were not only increasing their role in more and more health transactions, they were raking in more profit, adjusting premiums upwards the following year. Some doctors got sucked into the game too. They'd do more "precautionary" procedures and tests because what the hell, insurance was paying for it all and the patient didn't mind much.

This is a very coarse explanation of what happened, but the end result speaks for itself. Today, 45 million Americans are uninsured with many more working stiffs killing themselves to pay unbelievably high premiums, afraid of getting just one large medical bill. Many people seek any job that will provide health care while companies look to lower their contributions more every year. The office I work in had premiums increase more then 18% two years in a row.

Is it hopeless? I don't believe so at all. We just need to regain control of our democracy.

What would correct the problem for millions overnight is a basic "catastrophic only" policy. Insurance is what the majority of Americans would prefer, but it's not offered by a single company anywhere in the country because were it offered, no one would pay for marked-up health care any longer. A similar model works nicely for auto insurance in my state - drivers keep their cars running tip-top, paying for maintenance and repairs out of pocket, even paying cash in the event of accidents to avoid making claims above a set deductible amount. It's just what was in place 30 years ago when my father paid his doctor directly, and paid a relative pittance for real insurance and peace of mind.

If we could pay our doctors and hospitals directly, it would keep both the doctor's costs low and the premiums low. The health care corporations would lose - in fact it would eviscerate the industry which has grown immensely by adding paperwork to our medical transactions. But with the middleman gone, the costs would be that much more within reach of actually paying out of pocket. There are other ways to bring costs down as well.

Today we have a nationwide recruitment program seeking classroom teachers to address shortages in 16 major metropolitan areas, with hundreds more local programs educating and certifying college grads and career changers for careers in education. If health care is as fundamental an entitlement, there is no reason we can't train preventive care workers to man screening and treatment facilities, pre-buying many common services in bulk to contain costs, as would restoration of Medicare's bargaining power. We already know investment in prevention pre-empts emergency room costs, but it simultaneously drives medical costs lower. This is one facet of Barack Obama's campaign already, though he, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards all support continuation of middleman corporate health profiteering.

In conclusion, I think this large and important issue could be best addressed by adding Kucinich's plan to eliminate healthcare middlemen with Obama's plan to ramp up preventative programs and awareness. But the catastrophic-only policy is the missing ingredient that would preclude the need for single payer medicare-for-all where the government would have such a large role.

I invite other perspectives on this issue because millions will likely cast their '08 vote for the candidate that promises them the best options for coverage. But are the candidates appealing to the same individual greed that got us into this fix? We really need to work on normalizing costs, not looking for systems that subsidize costs.


Rate It | View Ratings

Gustav Wynn Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend