Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Pat Robertson Blows ID's Cover: 'Intelligent Design' Isn't about Science But about Putting God into the Classroom

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Andrew Bard Schmookler     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 53
Become a Fan
  (31 fans)
It 's not pretty, but at least it 's honest


Maybe you 've followed the controversy about the idea called 'Intelligent Design. ' That 's the notion that living organisms are simply too complex to have evolved merely by such natural processes as the biological theory of evolution describes, and that it 's necessary, therefore, to postulate a designing Intelligence to explain the living systems we see.


Advocates of Intelligent Design (ID) have claimed that it 's a scientific theory, a legitimate rival of the Darwinian theory, that warrants being taught in the science classes of America 's public schools.


Critics of ID and this includes almost all actual scientists who have weighed in on the matter have declared that ID isn 't science at all. Instead, they say, it is a way of sneaking religion into the public schools, an idea directly descended from the 'creationism ' whose inclusion in the public school curriculum the courts have found to be an unconstitutional government 'establishment ' of religion.


Now, in his latest fit of pique, Pat Robertson has blown the cover of ID.


The object of Robertson 's ire on this occasion was the citizenry of the town of Dover, Pennsylvania. These people just recently voted to replace a school board that had mandated the teaching of ID in the local public schools with another slate of candidates opposed to putting ID in the science curriculum.


If something bad happens to you, Robertson said to the people of Dover, don 't bother turning to God. He might not be there for you, he warned them, because "you just voted God out of your city. "


So there it is. If rejecting the inclusion of Intelligent Design is to be understood as "voting God out, " then surely it follows that what ID is about is bringing God in. Sounds like religion to me.


Which leads me to a question for all those Christians out there who have been militating for ID in the public schools. Did you already know what Pat Robertson seems to have known, that ID is about religion, and not science?


If the answer to that question is yes, I have another question for you. In your understanding of Christian morality, is honesty very important? Or does your Christian ethic say that the end justifies the means, i.e. that it 's OK to lie about what you 're up to, if what you 're up to is making sure that children get indoctrinated with your religious beliefs?


But if the idea that ID is not about science, but about promoting your religion, comes to you as a surprise, then I wonder, would that discovery lead you to withdraw your demand that ID be taught in our public schools?


What Would Jesus Say? Church/State and the Golden Rule


ID is, of course, only one of the battlefields in an intensifying struggle over the issue of Church/State relations. We 've had the Alabama justice with his monument to the Ten Commandments in the courthouse building. We 've got people wanting to put prayer back into the public schools. We 've got faith-based initiatives. Etc.


In all these cases, the people who want to instill aspects of their religion are members of America 's dominant faith. That is, they are Christians. More than that, they are members of a large and dynamic movement within American Christianity. That is to say, they are the ones who have enough clout to be quite confident that if the wall of separation between Church and State gets torn down, it is their religion that will be backed by power and imposed on everyone else.


I wonder if they 'd want that wall torn down if they were in the position of a small and vulnerable minority. Would they want it torn down, for example, it were Hindu and not Christian prayers that would be recited, and Hindu stories of creation and moral precepts that would be taught, etc.?


Actually, I don 't really wonder. I feel sure that, if power in their society rested with Hindus, or Buddhists, or Muslims, these Christians who are so avid now to wed religion to political power would think the "separation of Church and State " a vital part of our American system of limited government and personal liberty.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. His new book -- written to have an impact on the central political battle of our time -- is (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

# 8 Beliefs that Make Liberal America Weak: Barriers to the Source of Moral and Spiritual Passions

The Mystery of Obama's Relationship with Power