Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/2/11

Punishment for NSA & DOJ Overclassification in Drake Case

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
Author 5152
Message Jesselyn Radack

While I'm glad that - thanks to a no-win compromise - the nation will not be bankrupting itself, I again feel compelled to draw your attention away from the debt ceiling deal.  
Today's New York Times reports that former classification czar J. William Leonard filed a formal complaint with his former office - the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) - requesting punishment for the National Security Agency (NSA) and Justice Department officials who improperly classified documents in the Espionage Act case against NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake.

Leonard articulates the significance of his complaint in the Times:

If you're talking about throwing someone in jail for years, there absolutely has to be responsibility for decisions about what gets classified . . .

The document in question (an e-mail) was used as the basis for an Espionage Act charge for improper retention - not disclosure - of classified information.  Yet, according to Leonard, the e-mail never should have been classified in the first place. In fact, NSA declassified the e-mail after the indictment against Drake was filed.  

We know how the Drake case ended. The Justice Department's Espionage Act case completely collapsed, and Drake pleaded to a minor misdemeanor in July.   Judge Richard Bennett slammed the Justice Department  for its handling of the case and sentenced Drake to probation and community service.

Since then, Judge Bennett has agreed to allow Leonard to use the still-secret e-mail in his complaint against NSA and DOJ.  

Leonard's complaint is well taken. There is universal agreement that rampant overclassification plagues the intelligence community.  Steven Aftergood  put it best:

Depending on who you ask, overclassification is either very widespread or extremely widespread.

The difficulty is government officials are often punished for failing to classify information, but rarely or never punished for overclassifying information.

As classification czar, Leonard saw the massive problem of overclassification first hand, but he  said  about the Drake case:

I've never seen a more deliberate and willful example of government officials improperly classifying a document.

That "deliberate and willful" overclassification smacks of retaliation, and a Justice Department determined to punish a whistleblower for cooperating with government investigators and revealing NSA gross waste and illegalities.  

The significance of his own case is not lost on Drake, and he wrote about his case publicly for the first time in an  op-ed (which I co-authored) in yesterday's Philadelphia Inquirer :

This administration's attack on national-security whistle-blowers expands Bush's secrecy regime and cripples the free press by silencing its most important sources. It's a recipe for the slow poisoning of a democracy.

Improper classification only furthers the secrecy regime. There are certainly secrets that the government needs to keep - the identities of covert operatives, sources and methods, troop movements, etc. But to bastardize the classification system by using it to punish whistleblowers undermines both the system's legitimacy and our democracy.  

Hopefully, ISOO will recognize as much and will see Leonard's complaint as an opportunity to set a much-needed precedent for holding accountable government officials who keep too much government information from public view, particularly if the classified information is used as the basis for criminal charges.

ALSO REPUBLISHED BY WHISTLEBLOWERS ROUND TABLE.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Jesselyn Radack Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

My name is Jesselyn Radack and I am the former Justice Department ethics attorney and whistleblower in the case of "American Taliban" John Walker Lindh. In today's issue of The National Law Journal (Feb. 19, 2007), I have an Op-Ed entitled (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Charging Wikileaks Source: The Nail in the Coffin of Whistblowers

DHS Spies on Maryland Peace Activists: It's Worse Than We Thought

McCarthyism on Steroids: Monitoring Americans

Wash. Post Profile: Thomas Drake (An NSA Whistleblower We Would Have Cheered During the Bush Years)

Justice Department Leakers of Classified Info. Get a Pass

Yoo's Gift to President Obama: Return to Sender