Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 8 (13 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
General News

How Government Fails

By       Message William Boardman       (Page 1 of 5 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)  Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 14586
Become a Fan
  (30 fans)
- Advertisement -

 

FACED WITH F-35 FAILURES, COSTS --  CONGRESS SAYS TO PUSH ON 

 

Waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on.
Waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on.
Waist deep! Neck deep! Soon even a
Tall man'll be over his head, we're
Waist deep in the Big Muddy!
And the big fool says to push on!
  -- Pete Seeger  

- Advertisement -

By William Boardman 


F-35 nuclear-capable stealth fighter
(Image by F-16.net)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
 

- Advertisement -

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News. 

 

WHAT IF ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL FITS NOBODY?

 

According to one of its supporters, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is not "what our troops need," is "too costly " and "poorly managed," and its "present difficulties are too numerous to detail"." 

The F-35 is a case study of government failure at all levels -- civilian and military, federal, state, local, even airport authority.  Not one critical government agency is meeting its obligation to protect the people it presumably represents.   Senator Patrick Leahy, D-VT, who wrote the F-35 critique above, is hardly unique as an illustration of how government fails, but he sees no alternative to failure. 

- Advertisement -
Up for re-election in 2014 and long a supporter of basing the F-35 in Vermont, Leahy put those thoughts in a [1] letter [1] to a constituent made public March 13.  This is Leahy's most recent public communication since December 2012, when he refused to meet with opponents of the F-35 and his [2] website [2] listed a page of "public discussion" events mostly from the spring, including private briefings with public officials, without responding to any substantive issues.   

 

The F-35 is a nuclear-capable weapon of mass destruction that was supposed to be the "fighter of the future" when it was undertaken in 2001.  Now, more than a decade overdue and more than 100% over budget, the plane is expected to cost $1.5  trillion over its useful life, of which about $400 billion has already been spent. 

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?