Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/29/09

Crawling Out from Under the Rocks

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   6 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Andrew Schmookler
Become a Fan
  (31 fans)
With respect to the Bushite crimes, it is far from clear where as a nation are heading.  Will there be extensive further investigations of the regime's wrong-doing?  Will there be prosecutions?  Will the nation choose instead to "look forward" and leave the dark crimes of this unprecedently lawless administration behind?

As I wrote in the piece on "Obama and Transparency," it is not even clear where the president wants them to go:  at the implicit level, he gives impetus to the movement to deal with this past by turning over the rocks and showing us what crawls out while at the same time, at the explicit level, he declares that he's not in favor of looking backward.

There are many forces now swirling and eddying, and what kind of current will issue forth out of this interplay is something that we'll know only with time.  This appears to me to be one of those things in which most of the actors are having to assess their positions and dispositions on an ongoing basis, as the climate of opinion and the areas of political opportunity and danger become clear.

How will the American people react?  That is probably as important a determinant of the outcome as any other single factor.  And the more deeply the American people are shocked and offended by what they learn, the greater will be the political force to look more deeply and repudiate or punish more fully.

Many people here on NSB expressed lately --on "What to Think about 9/11"-- that the traumatic events of that day be re-opened to investigation.  Many here believe that an honest investigation will expose the darkest and deepest level of evil of all the Bushite crimes:  i.e., that behind the attacks were, ultimately, the American administration itself, wanting a provocation that would justify the wars and the police-state arrogations of presidential power that in fact did follow from the 9/11 disaster.

Whether or not the attacks of 9/11 are to be included among the Bushite crimes, the American people are far less prepared to contemplate that possibility --still "unthinkable" to most Americans-- than they are to recognize the wrong-doing of those things that have already become common knowledge from the documentation and statements already made:  torture and warrantless wiretapping.

On both of these, we have come to a point where important questions can now be asked that --depending on the answers-- might provide the basis for a whole new level of discrediting, disgracing, and repudiating the Bushites.

In each case, the apparent crimes have generally been understood by the American people to have been committed as part of the effort by the Bushites to "protect" the American people.  But in pursuing these questions it is possible that this justification can be demolished.

And that's important:  a high proportion of the American people seem inclined to accept presidential crimes motivated by some over-eagerness to prevent terrorists from making attacks against Americans in the "homeland."  This priority of fear over any commitment to the supposedly canonical American dedication to "the rule of law" is how the Bushites maintained as much credibility as it did as their lawlessness became ever clearer during the second term.

But if the investigation of these practices were to lead to a clear conclusion that the purpose of the crimes was not to protect the people but rather that they were part and parcel of the whole criminal enterprise that WAS the Bushite regime, then American attitudes would shift across a whole continental divide of public opinion.  If the crimes were not to protect the people, but part of the regime's ongoing victimization and exploitation of the people, all the gloves (I would predict) would come off.

(Then, I would guess, even the idea that 9/11 was an inside job could become widely "thinkable.")

Here are the two directions for the questioning to go.


The question about the warrantless wiretapping issue --now the more quiescent of the two-- has been in front of our eyes for years already:  on whom did the administration do its warrantless spying, and why did it not bother to get the warrants required by law?

With the Jane Harman wiretap it looked for a few days as if perhaps the time was becoming ripe for pursuing this question.  Now, however, it appears that in that case, the wiretapping was done by the FBI with a warrant and not by the NSA without a warrant.  So once again remains to be seen how and when this question of the warrantless surveillance will be energetically pursued.

But the matter remains a mystery. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Andrew Schmookler Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. His new book -- written to have an impact on the central political battle of our time -- is (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

# 8 Beliefs that Make Liberal America Weak: Barriers to the Source of Moral and Spiritual Passions

Power and Corruption: Just What Is Their Relationship?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend