Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Inspector Clouseau Squared

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

In one of the more ironic episodes of the Bush Administration, the Federal Bureau of Investigation last week raided the office and home of the senior official in charge of protecting Federal whistleblowers on suspicion of whistleblower retaliation within his own agency – while he was investigating possible criminal acts within the White House.


Since 2005, Scott Bloch, head of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), has been under investigation by the Inspector General of the White House Office of Personnel Management (OPM), at the behest of the President’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB).


The FBI raid was triggered by suspicion that Bloch may have destroyed computer records to obstruct justice, that he retaliated against whistleblowers who complained they were transferred out of Washington for political reasons because they disagreed with Bloch’s policies, and that he may have violated the Hatch Act, which forbids putting political pressure on career government employees. In the raid, FBI agents seized computers and records.


As OPM’s investigation moved forward, Bloch launched an investigation of the White House by combining several unrelated high-profile allegations, including last year’s firing of eight U.S. Attorneys, thousands of missing emails to and from former White House political advisor Karl Rove, and political briefings of General Services Administration managers, in violation of the Hatch Act.


The missing emails – also demanded by the U.S. Congress – are said to relate to Rove’s alleged involvement in the U.S. attorneys’ dismissals.

In yet another irony, the FBI raid on Bloch’s office and home came as Congress prepared to mark Washington Whistleblower Week, May 12-16, and on the sixth anniversary of the passage of the No FEAR Act in 2002. The act requires the government to compensate whistleblowers for judgments, awards, and settlements in equal employment opportunity (EEO) and whistleblower cases.

 The Administration’s investigation of Bloch comes as a result of a complaint filed by his own staff members and whistleblower groups alleging a host of misconduct charges against Bloch. The complaint charged he discriminated against OSC employees by imposing illegal gag orders, cronyism, and retaliation in forcing employee relocations and the resignations of one-fifth of OSC headquarters legal and investigative staff.  

Bloch insists that the ‘forced removals’ were part of a reorganization that sent 12 career OSC employees to new assignments in other cities “to improve performance, not punish any employees.”

 One part of that complaint concerns Bloch’s improper interference with the handling of Hatch Act cases, the same statute that Bloch is now invoking as the basis for looking at White House political briefings. Bloch’s investigation of the White House follows allegations that the Justice Department (DOJ) fired eight U.S. Attorneys for political reasons, that senior officials including Rove violated the Presidential Records Act by using an email account of the Republican National Committee and failing to archive these communications, and that Bush appointees delivered politically-charged briefings to career civil service employees.  

Bloch contends that one of the fired U.S. Attorneys, David Iglesias, suffered discriminatory treatment because of his 45-day absence for military service.


Public interest groups including Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) and the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) have charged that Bloch has irreconcilable conflicts of interest in his investigations of the White House.


Jeff Ruch, Executive Director PEER told us, "Scott Bloch gives opportunism a bad name."


“It makes no sense for Scott Bloch to investigate the White House while the White House investigates Bloch,” Ruch said, noting that Bloch has told allies that the White House has twice asked him to resign. Bloch can only be removed for cause. “


The 600 disclosure cases that Bloch has admitted were dismissed are all instances where civil servants came forward to report waste, fraud and abuse, yet OSC decided that there was no need to investigate," Ruch said.


He added, "Dismissing all 600 cases and deciding that not one deserved investigation -- because, in the words of the OSC spokesperson, they were all ‘minor matters or issues previously investigated’ -- stretches credulity."

 “Scott Bloch brings the investigative acumen of an Inspector Clouseau to a very complicated and delicate matter,” he said. 

POGO’s Director of Investigations, Beth Daley, said “It is not that Bloch has lacked the opportunities to conduct complex investigations since every virtually whistleblower in town goes to the OSC, but Bloch has ignored them all.  It is only when a probe serves his political agenda that he latches onto it as if it were the last helicopter leaving Saigon.”


“What we have here is a mutual investigation society. This is the bureaucratic equivalent of a mouse trying to swallow an elephant. The OSC has no standing to conduct the investigation and Scott Bloch cannot possibly investigate the White House while it is investigating him,” Daly declared.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

WILLIAM FISHER Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

William Fisher has managed economic development programs in the Middle East and elsewhere for the US State Department and the US Agency for International Development. He served in the international affairs area in the Kennedy Administration and now (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)


Liberties Lost Since 9/11

The Silence of the Sheep


Law Professors Outraged by Senate Vote on Indefinite Detention

Feel Safer Now?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend