Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

CNN poll: Edwards DESTROYS GOP candidates (with graphs!)

By       Message the web     Permalink    (# of views)   2 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 1384
- Advertisement -

So CNN released a poll that matched up our top three with the GOP's top four (sans Thompson), and the numbers could not be more stark.  John Edwards DESTROYS all the GOP candidates by the widest margins of our top three.  So here, I do what I've done before in making pretty graphs to look at the numbers below the fold.

Again, for each GOP candidate, in the margin column I've bolded the race that would give us the best margin of victory.

CNN poll results (.pdf)

Clinton 51%Giuliani 45%Win by 6%
Obama 52%Giuliani 45%Win by 7%
Edwards 53%Giuliani 44%Win by 9%
Clinton 54%Romney 43%Win by 11%
Obama 54%Romney 41%Win by 13%
Edwards 59%Romney 37%Win by 22%
Clinton 48%McCain 50%Lose by 2%
Obama 48%McCain 48%Tie
Edwards 52%McCain 44%Win by 8%
Clinton 54%Huckabee 44%Win by 10%
Obama 55%Huckabee 40%Win by 15%
Edwards 60%Huckabee 35%Win by 25%

Notice a pattern?  :-)

- Advertisement -

So, what does that translate to in graphical form?  Visually, it becomes quite obvious.

And here's the column version for y'all to copy onto Blogger or Blogspot and other sites that have thinner margins.

- Advertisement -

Unfortunately, the CNN poll didn't provide demographic breakdowns like SurveyUSA always provides, so I can't do additional armchair analysis of what percent of Republicans cross over to vote for our candidates, or Democrats that choose to vote GOP.  But I think here, the numbers speak for themselves.

The Edwards-Huckabee numbers are especially surprising, given that many of us were worried about Huckabee's economic populist stances taking away from Edwards.  But if I may armchair pundit, perhaps we're seeing the reverse of the situation where you have a Republican versus a Democrat running as Republican-lite, and the voters choose the real thing.  Here, you have a real economic populist, against a guy who talks a good game, but his Fair Tax bullshit sort of throws that out the window.  Looks like voters go for the real economic populist.

It should be noted that some of these matchups differ wildly in other polls.  For example, Rasmussen has Hillary doing better against Rudy than Edwards does.  And that poll shows Edwards leading Huckabee by only a 44%-40% margin, quite a bit different from CNN's 25-point blowout.

So this CNN poll is just one poll.  It may be a good or bad poll, we'll see.  I'd like to see other non-partisan polling firms come out with these matchups to more accurately gauge what the national mood is.

And as mentioned before, the margin of victory is also crucial in that it needs to be greater than the GOP's margin for theft, chicanery, and voter suppression.  Did you guys really think the GOP is gonna suddenly stop intimidating black voters or shredding registration forms?  I don't think so.  A 3-point lead can be stolen, and nobody bats an eyelash, because it was all within the margin of error.  But if the polls show our candidate up by double digits, and they lose, most Americans WOULD bat an eyelash over those results.Again, these polls are just a snapshot in time, things can change, yadda, yadda, yadda.  You know the spiel by now.  :-)

- Advertisement -

Finally, take a look at the last question in the CNN poll, on faith in presidential politics.  Is the religious pandering really what the American people want?

In general, would you prefer the presidential candidates to talk openly about their religious views or would you prefer them to keep their religious views as a private matter?

Talk openly about religious views   41%
Religious views a private matter    57%
No opinion                                         2%

Still, that 41% that DO want presidential candidates talking about it is way too high a number.


crossposted from, by BruinKid


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

anonymously sourced from either the web or a forwarded email.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Jim Cramer Uses CNBC to Manipulate Stocks

Video: Is Bristol Palin Baby Trig's Mother? Evidence & Pictures

BabyGate: Explosive New Details and the Smoking Gun Photo

Romney's Storm Tips

Feeding The Homeless BANNED In Major Cities All Over America

Most Massive Natural Disaster in US History-- and you don't know what caused it.