Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

America's Maoist-like Cultural Revolution

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   2 comments
Author 6445
Message Stephen Pizzo
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
"Anti-intellectualism is often used by dictators or those seeking to establish dictatorships. Educated people as a social group have often been seen by totalitarian elements as a threat because of the tendency of intellectuals to question existing social norms and to dissent from established opinion. Thus, often violent anti-intellectual backlashes are common during the rise and rule of authoritarian political movements, such as Fascism, Stalinism and Theocratic rule. Moreover, because many intellectuals refuse to embrace nationalism, they are also commonly portrayed as unpatriotic and subversive." (Full)

When I read an opinion piece, like this one, the first thing I want to know is "where is the author coming from? What are his/her biases?"

So let's get that right out of the way. I'm about as average a guy as the Baby Boom generation could create. I was raised by hard-working middle class parents. We were neither rich or poor. I got my first job -- bagging groceries -- when I was 16. If I'd been a better student in high school, I might have gone on to a university, but I was an awful student. (These days they'd probably have me on a Ritalin IV drip, I was so "distracted" -- as in bored to tears -- in class.) So I went to the JC, where I lasted one semester before flunking out, losing my S2 student deferment and ending up in the Marine Corps. I never went back to school but instead commenced an enormously interesting series of professions -- none of which I was qualified for -- but which I somehow profitably pulled off in one fashion or another.

I only mention all that because the subject of this piece is America's sudden obsession with "elitists." Now that you know where I'm coming from you can assume that, while I may be many things, I am no elitist. My CV would not get me past the front gate of a country club, much less a full membership.

Now, onto the meat of this meal.

Ever since Barack Obama was overheard describing middle America as a place filled with people who are "bitter" over their economic circumstances and "clinging to guns and religion," the debate has been fully engaged. Is he an "elitist?" Does he "look down on average Americans?"

While it took Obama's comments to flush these kind of sentiments into the light of day, they've been around for decades. By my reckoning America's own cultural revolution began in earnest with Ronald Reagan's first run for president. Reagan was an actor, whose entire public persona was defined by fictional, gritty and heroic characters in the movies. While Reagan's political opponents were men of letters, he himself was little more than an amalgam of scripted characters.

Yet Reagan vanquished his better-educated foes, not once, but continually. He pulled this off by leveraging those fictional personas, the brave WWII fighter pilot, the heroic railroad worker who loses his legs in a rail accident, but rises again. Doing so tapped a reservior of resentment and estrangement with Washington and politicians middle Americans felt neither understood or represented them. Reagan's characters spoke to tens of millions of hard-working, white Americans. Those characters -- and therefore Reagan -- was one of them, one with them against an increasingly complex world that seemed to be leaving them puzzled, scared and behind.

That meant having to cast Reagan's opponents as something else. And that something else became, "elitists." They becamce "over-educated" snobs who did not understand average Americans, who hung out with other "elitists," particularly members of the press and all those suspiciously "anti-American" university professors.

When other countries complained about Reagan's foreign policies, "average Americans" turned their ire on them as well. The UN and and "Ur-o-peans," were added to what has become a growing list of "elitists" who "just didn't get it... didn't understand the great American average guys and gals were the heart and soul of real America."

That sentiment grew over the years, reinforced by the fumbling presidency of Jimmy Carter and later by the self-indulgent, "I'm the smartest guy in the room, a Rhodes Scholar, and I can do whatever I want," tenure of Bill Clinton -- and his equally needy and self-impressed sidekick, Hillary.

Eventually these anti-intellectual/anti-elitist sentiments gave us eight years of George W. Bush, a man so intellectually stunted he makes me look like a Rhode Scholar.

I am not going to diminish average Americans, because they can be pretty amazing and inspiring folks.

I knew them well back in the mid-1970s, when I bought and ran a dairy farm in Wisconsin, just south of Madison. They taught me everything I came to know about farming, a tough juggling act of a profession if ever there was one. Disaster continually lurked around every corner for a farmer. and it took guts and daily skill to avoid them. Husbands, wives and children worked incredibly hard in concert to make a modest living.

Having said that, I would not want any farmer I met during those years running the country. All I had to do was to let a conversation stray from farming and the weather to politics, religion, race or the economy to understand why.

My wife, a nurse, worked at a local Catholic hospital. Another nurse, a local gal, protested to Sue one day that those folks in Washington think everyone in middle America was racist.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Stephen Pizzo Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Stephen Pizzo has been published everywhere from The New York Times to Mother Jones magazine. His book, Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans, was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Secrets Kill Too

Dying for Change

What's the Matter With Gaza?

Who You Callin' Un-American?

Worst Clinton Contributor Ever

I Was At the Birth...

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: