Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Sin Of Moses-The Use Of Force

By       Message Sheldon Drobny       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   3 comments

Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 191
- Advertisement -
I have often thought about the portion of the Torah that describes the reason why God denied Moses the right to cross into the promised land. According to the story, God had commanded Moses to wait for the rock to let the water flow naturally to give to his thirsty followers.  Instead, Moses struck the rock twice in frustration because the people had been complaining of their thirst.  After leading the people for 40 years, Moses no longer had the patience to trust in the natural course of events and instead relied on his own "knee jerk" instincts.  He resorted to using physical force.  However, I have always wondered why there was such a harsh punishment for what seems to have been a minor transgression?
Like most stories in scripture, the biblical authors reflected their sense of morality in light of the times in which they lived.  As time has passed and the original stories have been translated into many languages, the original intent of the authors is usually lost.  The mysteries of the context of this and other stories have led to interpretations that may explain what the biblical authors were thinking.  In that regard, below is an article that I read about the interpretation of the Moses story and how it may be applicable to our current crises in the Middle East. You can find it at http://www.beliefnet.com
Striking the Rock
Both sides in the Israeli/palestinian crisis should reflect on what the Torah teaches about our responses under pressure.
By Haim Watzman 
    
- Advertisement -

As the world watches international debate rages about the correctness of military action and whether Palestinian provocation merited the intensity of the Israeli response. Can the Torah help us navigate the dilemmas Israel faces?

The portion of the Torah Jews read during the last week of June, is Parashat Hukkat (Numbers 19:1 - 22:1). At its center is one of the Bible’s best-known stories. Moses strikes a rock to bring forth water for the thirsty children of Israel, for which God punishes him by denying him entry into the Promised Land.

- Advertisement -

Given the devastating nature of the punishment, one would think that the nature of our greatest prophet’s sin would be clear and unequivocal. Here, if anywhere, one would expect the Torah to be explicit about what Moses did wrong and why the penalty was a fitting one.

Yet the text is ambiguous--so much so that the great 19th-century Italian commentator, Shmuel David Luzzatto, refused to elucidate the question. His predecessors, he said, had attributed no less than 13 sins to Moses, and he feared that if he thought about it, he’d burden the poor man with yet another transgression.

Moses had to provide his thirsty people with water. Israel must provide its citizens with security.  However, having the right to invade and bomb doesn’t mean that invading and bombing is necessarily the right thing to do. Military force is a blunt instrument for achieving diplomatic, political, and strategic goals. Even precision attacks too often miss their mark, killing the wrong people.  Furthermore, since even armies with the best possible intelligence operate in the face of many unknowns, the outcomes of military actions are notoriously hard to predict. A single misstep—striking camp too far away from the nearest source of water—lost the Crusaders their kingdom in a single, agonizing battle.

But since major military actions inevitably cause pain, death, and suffering, they cannot be justified morally simply by asserting the right to use force. The design and extent of the operation has to be such that it exacts the lowest price consistent with achievement of realistic goals.

Does Israel’s current policy meet this criterion? The ways our sages have defined Moses’ actions at the rock elucidate ways in which a justified action can turn into a serious misjudgment. According to Maimonides, God punished Moses because he acted in anger. His anger was warranted, but violence committed in the heat of anger is not. According to Nachmanides, Moses’ sin was to hit the rock twice when only one blow would have been sufficient.

In the current context, we can see here a warning against the use of excessive force. According to Sforno, Moses erred by not leaving the miracle to God. By striking the rock, he cast himself as a wonder worker, trying to aggrandize himself in the eyes of the people. The Israeli army is a dedicated and disciplined force, subservient to its civilian government—but as in other armies around the world, its officers like to call the shots and reap the glory, even on problems that can be better solved by diplomacy.

- Advertisement -

I don’t believe that we can open the Bible and find the answer to the intractable dilemmas of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Torah is not an oracle. In fact, the indeterminacy of the story of Moses and the rock shows that, in times of crisis, leaders may, with the best of intentions, make bad decisions. Jews have been arguing for three thousand years what Moses did wrong at the rock. But the Torah story does serve to remind us that while crises call for strong leaders who do not hesitate to act, those leaders would do best to act soberly, and to be humble enough to admit that they can do no more than make the best educated guesses they can about what the outcome of a military operation will be.

I hope that Palestinian Muslim leaders are using the stories of their tradition to reach similar conclusions. Unfortunately, many Muslim extremists seem determined to escalate the conflict. I suspect that they hope for a harsh Israeli response that will gain them international sympathy. But battering the rock until it breaks is not a good strategy for either side. 

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Sheldon Drobny was the co-founder of Nova M radio and Air America Radio. He has supported many philanthropic causes. Mr. Drobny specializes in business and tax matters and is admitted to practice before the U.S. Tax Court as a non-attorney. Less (more...)
 

Sheldon Drobny Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

OIL COMPANY PRICE INCREASES: FACT OR FICTION

Eisenhower "I Shall Go To Korea " Speech

Saving the Wealthy Class from Itself

Insanity Is Trump: Bush And The Prudent Man Rule

"In God We Trust": The Worship Of Money

McBush Is Stupid Or Lying About Offshore Drilling