Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Obama's "Shocking" Win in South Carolina: Is it really so shocking?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
With 55% of the votes, Barack Obama won the South Carolina primary, his first victory since the 2008 primary season began in Iowa on a cold January night. Many talking heads are applying adjectives of importance to Obama’s recent victory, but how significant is it really?

The Politics of ‘Manifested Destiny’

“Barack Obama was destined to win in South Carolina.” That’s the line that his nearest rival Bill and Hillary Clinton will be repeating, or at the very least implying, all of the way up to Super-Ultra-Mega Tuesday on February 5th.  

The claim isn’t really that off base. The idea that no one but Obama was going to win in

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA
South Carolina may hold credence. This is a state, as former President Clinton has made a point of, which Jesse Jackson won in both the 1984 and 1988 Democratic caucuses. If Obama didn’t win, then all signs point to the conclusion that it would’ve been the end of his presidential hopes and dreams.

In South Carolina, 50% of Democratic voters are black. It was known that the vast majority of African Americans were going to vote for Obama. With a percentage of white votes thrown into the mix, it seemed that Obama really couldn’t lose.

It turns out that nearly 80% of blacks did vote for Barack Obama. Combined with the 24% of whites who voted for him, he garnered 55% of the vote in South Carolina, beating his nearest rival, Hillary Clinton, nearly two to one.

But wasn’t the outcome pretty much to be expected? Any professional politician or pundit who says that the South Carolina results are “shocking,” “surprising,” or use some other buzz word to describe the outcome, are either dumb or dishonest. Let’s look at the South Carolina 1988 caucus results: Jackson 54%, Gore 18%, Dukakis 7%.

Politics of Race

Here’s something that should be very troubling for Obama, but no one is talking about it. In South Carolina he only won 24% of white votes. That’s down tremendously from Iowa, (33%) and New Hampshire (36%). In fact, the winner among white voters was John Edwards with a total of 40%.

The problem for Obama is that blacks make up 20% of the population and whites 65%. So, he’s apparently in danger of losing ground with white voters, though his support among African American voters is surging. He’s also losing ground in the next largest demographic, Hispanics, which account for 16% of the population.

Obama’s win in South Carolina is expected, not surprising, or stunning, or any of that. It is, in a sense, history repeating itself.

Bill and Hillary Clinton have already begun to dismiss the result in this race as ‘a black win in a black state.’ The goal is to minimalize the effect of Obama’s landslide victory in South Carolina heading into Super Tuesday.

Truly Amazing

There are a few things that have been amazing about this race. One is how rank and file democrats are bolting from the Clintons. Bill Clinton, since he was elected in 1992, has long been the most revered and influential member of the party, looked to as the party leader by most.

Nevertheless, lifelong Democrats and major party figures such as John Kerry, the 2004 presidential nominee, Tom Daschle former Senate Majority leader, and Party fixture Edward Kennedy are all giving public support to Obama’s campaign.

In the end, though, despite Hillary Clinton’s longer list of official endorsements, these announcements serve as a reminder that the Clintons were Washington outsiders and they really weren’t too well liked by Congressional Democrats.

What’s Next…

Moving out of South Carolina, Barack Obama’s victory guarantees him the viability to raise funds to finance his campaign through the 22 contests that take place on February 5th.

Hillary Clinton has hatched a bizarre plan to raise the significance of Florida, a state that had its delegates stripped that she and all other candidates agreed to not campaign in, just so she can have the last “win” before Super Tuesday.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Rev. Robert Vinciguerra Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Founder of "The Rev. Rob Times," ( Rev. Robert A. Vinciguerra has been a longtime student of journalism. From Phoenix, Arizona.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Thomas Paine – An American Liberal Lion

Sarah Palin Admits Muslims Have Right To Build Mosque Two Blocks From Ground Zero, Yet Hate-Filled Rhetoric Continues

Inventing God: A Case Study in Creating a New Religion

On the Neuroticism of Fox News Viewers

Solving Illegal Immigration for Dummies

Fighting Foreclosure: The Tools and Resources to Prevent Foreclosure

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend