Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

MUST READ: Why Do Phony Outrage Pundits Hate America?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   10 comments
Message Randy LoBasso
You don't trust an enemy.

And America has many domestic enemies. Most are members of the "Phony Outrage Base" – pundits who pretend to get angry for ratings, politicians to pretend to get angry for votes, voters who pretend to get angry because they hate themselves and need an outlet to spew their hate.

Over the past few weeks, our domestic enemies, in the form of political pundits, have been railing against John McCain, the probable Republican nominee. Normally I'd say, "Hey, they're turning inward. That's a good thing." Unfortunately, our enemies aren't stupid.

Rush Limbaugh recently devoted his entire three-hour program to blasting McCain. Ann Coulter appeared on Hannity and Colmes last week and said she'd campaign for Hillary Clinton if McCain was the nominee. Laura Ingraham says she doesn't trust McCain. Michael Reagan, son of the former president, said McCain speaks down to conservatives. The list goes on, and on.

Go to Human Events Online and try to find a positive article about McCain. Seriously, go ahead.

Now, let's ask the question. What do all of these pundits have in common?

Give up?

(Truth is, this is a pre-written article, so I don't know if you're actually answering me. But if you are, I'm going to be honest, that's a little weird. No offense.)

They all make money by giving their conservative opinion. Most of those I mentioned came into their own during the Clinton years. They opportunistically defined themselves as conservatives in the Goldwater-Reagan mold, and Bill Clinton as the devil.

There is no Republican to rally around this year, the way they did George W. Bush. But of the three left (no offense Dr. Paul, but I don't consider you "left" in the Republican race), McCain is the most likely to get things done in office. They would be the wrong things and compromised things, but still, they'd be things.

Should this happen, the talk radio audience would finally wake up because talk radio would have nothing to talk about. It would cease to be what it is. Many would realize, no, Sean Hannity isn't a "great American," he's a brat who hates his audience enough to lie to them daily.

If you think Sean Hannity doesn't hate you, you probably hate yourself.

If McCain is the president, congressional Republicans will join with him, because that's what Republicans do, they get in line. And McCain is a conservative, one of the most conservative members of the Senate. Sure, he was against the Bush tax cuts, but that's because he doesn't hate the middle and working classes of America, and realized we were in a war. He wants to save our environment, and that's because he doesn't hate the earth. He supported immigration reform because he thinks rounding up illegal aliens and dumping them back in Mexico is something Stalin would have done. Doing nothing – which, it seems, the majority of Republicans are now intent on doing – is something Jimmy Carter would have done.

And for the record, it seems at odd with reality that Republicans would be against environmentalism. So I have my own theory on that. The reason Republicans don't believe in global warming is because they have to pander to their base. No, not the "Phony Outrage Base," but close.

This is the base consisting of Evangelicals who home-school their kids because public schools teach evolution. The ones who believe God made the world in seven crazy nights 5,000 years ago, and put dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith...and the sun revolves around the earth. The ones who believe it would be impossible for humans to kill the earth since we aren't God.

Who would Limbaugh rail against if the Republican president and the Republican congress did things he didn't favor? He would be against everyone. His radio show would be the same as Alex Jones's: Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, all to no purpose, with almost no audience to speak of. Rush Limbaugh would have to make a new career out of being a 9/11 Truther.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Randy LoBasso Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Randy LoBasso lives in Philadelphia, PA, where he does a bunch of freelance writing. He wrote for OpEdNews in 2007/2008.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great American Hysteria

Absolute Phony Outrage

Joe The Plumber Losing His Fanbase, Finally

To Change the Subject: Smear

The Quick End of Bipartisanship

9/11 Truth - Let's Get This Straight

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend