Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Stonewalling Plame

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   3 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message James Brett
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
Federal District Judge John D. Bates, who on Thursday dismissed the civil suit of Valerie Plame Wilson against Vice President Cheney, President Bush, et al over the disclosure of her CIA identity, made a grievous and outrageous error of interpretation in this case, an error which can only be ascribed to collusion with the defendants, an outrage at least as serious as the original offense.

Judge Bates declared the actions of all the defendants as within the scope of their duties and, therefore, under the federal statute protecting federal employees from liability for their actions persuant to their legitimate jobs, that no crime had taken place.  He described the outting of Plame as deplorable, but that these officials had a right to counter charges made by Valerie Plame Wilson's husband Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson in his published disclosure that there was no reason to believe that Saddam Hussein had actually purchased yellow-cake uranium from an African country. The judge studiously ignored the statute that makes it illegal to reveal the identity of covert agents of the federal government.  Perhaps the judge thought that not ignoring the statute would give credence to the Plame case that the statute is in play, a matter of considerable disagreement among legal scholars, since the Congress wrote the statute with very little concern for actual implementation of the law.  Even so, the judge cannot dismiss one law in favor of another without hearing evidence.

What the judge did do was to say that countering a statement by one individual can be accomplished by injuring a relative or spouse of that individual, which is clearly not legal, not ethical, not the intent of the law that protects federal employees, and which raises the question of whether the judge meant to found his argument on the flimseyest possible foundation thus to get it out of his court and his ass off the front burner!

The damage to Valerie Plame is obvious.  She can no longer act as a covert agent.  Her career is ruined.  She is asked to bear the reprisal from Cheney et al for the affront that her husband gave this corrupt administration. 

The damage to the anti-nuclear proliferation group where she worked is perhaps less obvious, but nevertheless discernible.  Now all agents of that group must operate with the fear that their own identities will be compromised—and their lives and families jeopardized—if they choose to provide intelligence that is not what Cheney or Bush expected and wanted.  Moreover, the damage to the anti-nuclear proliferations group's reputation is now established at just the very moment when the question about an Iranian nuclear weapon threat is very much on the table.  Cheney deliberately set up this cloud so that rapid response to a concocted threat from Iran would not be scrutinized by the CIA group that would normally do so.

The implications of Judge Bates's decision will go much further than the appeal Valerie Plame will mount.  The absurdity of the decision calls up the question of collusion and obstruction of justice from within the justice system itself.  It is a very sad day for Constitutional government and yet one more clear sign that the only way out is impeachment of Cheney and then of Bush.


Rate It | View Ratings

James Brett Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

James R. Brett, Ph.D. taught Russian History before (and during) a long stint as an academic administrator in faculty research administration. His academic interests are the modern period of Russian History since Peter the Great, Chinese (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Economy v. Ecology

VP Debate: One Gigantic Mistake by Sarah Palin ... Huge!

Tell It Like It Is

The Meaning of the Mike Connell Story: Under the Bus

Capitalism, Fascism, and Socialism

The End of the Marshall Plan

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend