In his Senate testimony yesterday, former DOJ Chief of Staff Kyle Sampson strove hard to be a "Loyal Bushie" and continually denied that the unprecedented mid-term firing of 8 U.S. Attorney's was for "political reasons" - but in doing so he may have damaged the credibility of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales beyond all hope of repair.
From the NYTimes.
Mr. Sampson flatly contradicted the attorney general’s claim that he did not participate in the selection of the prosecutors to be fired and never had a conversation about "where things stood." Mr. Sampson testified that Mr. Gonzales was "aware of this process from the beginning," and that the two men regularly discussed where things stood. Mr. Sampson also confirmed that Mr. Gonzales was at the Nov. 27 meeting where the selected prosecutors’ fates were sealed.
Under oath Sampson stated.
"I don’t think the attorney general’s statement that he was not involved in any discussions of U.S. attorney removals was accurate."
Just as a refresher, that would be this statement made by Gonzales on 3/12/07 that:
"I was not involved in seeing any memos, was not involved in any discussions about what was going on."
Yet According to Sampson Gonzales was apparently involved in five discussions of the Attorney firings. Via Atrios.
"So he (Gonzales) was involved in discussions in contrast to his statement" this month? Specter asked.
"Yes." Sampson replied.
Sen. Charles Schumer then asked about Gonzales also claiming that he saw no documents on this matter.
Sampson replied: "I don't think it's entirely accurate."- Advertisement -
Schumer: "There was repeated discussions??
Sampson: "Yes...at least five."
Forgetting one single meeting most people could understand, maybe two - but five!? It seems to me where headed full bore for Libby-ville (where Scooter claims that he first heard about Valerie Plame-Wilsons' CIA connection from Tim Russert was contradicted by at least six seperate witnesses)
How's that grill taste Abu?