Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds

Depleted Uranium and Depleted Democracy

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message David Swanson       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   3 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 9
Become a Fan
  (141 fans)
- Advertisement -

Remarks at October 27, 2007, rally in Jonesborough, Tenn., preceding march to Aerojet Ordnance, manufacturers of Depleted Uranium weapons.

There are those who think Congress should keep shelling out our grandchildren's money to continue our occupation of Iraq, and there are those who think Congress should pass a bill opposing the occupation.  And they are both wrong.  Any decent bill on any issue, much less this one, will be vetoed.  The way to stop funding the occupation of Iraq is for Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to announce on Monday that they will not bring to the floor any more bills to fund the occupation. 

Some House members would try to start a discharge petition to get around Pelosi, but they would fail.  Some Senators would demand a war funding bill, but they would not get past a filibuster.  The legal funding of the occupation of Iraq would be over. 

But Bush would not end the occupation.  He would misappropriate funds from the Pentagon to keep it going.  I almost said keep it going illegally, but it's always been illegal.  In fact, Bush misappropriated funds to build bases and move troops and equipment to invade Iraq over five years ago.  At this time five years ago, weapons factories, like Boeing's, were working double shifts for Shock and Awe, and our televisions were telling us Bush wanted to resolve everything peacefully.

- Advertisement -

When General Petraeus betrayed us with his testimony last month, a congress member asked him what he would do if congress were to cut off funding for the occupation of Iraq and Bush were to order him to keep it going.  Petraeus said he'd need to ask his lawyer.

But Bush would keep it going, and Congress would have two choices.  One would be to surrender and admit that the first and most powerful branch of our government as laid out in our Constitution is no longer part of the government at all.  The second option would be to make use of that portion of the Constitution that reads: "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Impeachment is the one thing the president cannot stop.  He cannot veto it.  He cannot signing statement it.  He cannot spin it.  All he can do is crawl back to Crawford with Dick Cheney to await their criminal trials.

- Advertisement -

You may have heard that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice testified in Congress this week.  You may have seen a photo of Desiree Farooz holding blood covered hands up to Condi's face in an attempt to show her what she has done.  Rice testified on two days before two committees, the second being the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chaired by Congressman Henry Waxman.  Months ago, Waxman subpoenaed Rice, and she publicly announced she would not comply because she was not inclined to.  When Rice testified on Thursday, Waxman agreed not to ask her about topics she was not inclined to discuss.  The subpoena orders Rice to testify about forged documents that were used by the president to claim Iraq had tried to purchase uranium in Africa.

Rice and Bush and Cheney and several other individuals and departments in the Bush administration have refused to comply with subpoenas, an offense for which the House Judiciary Committee passed an article of impeachment against Richard Nixon.  And the subpoenas and investigations are not even needed to prove the crimes.  Far from establishing that Iraq was any threat to this nation or apologizing for having clearly lied about it, this gang is using almost identical lies to push this nation toward an attack on Iran.  And, again, uranium is involved.  Cheney's latest scheme is reportedly to persuade Israel to bomb a uranium enrichment plant in Iran. 

The White House has, in fact, just labeled a section of Iran's military a terrorist group.  Up until this point, if the tern "terrorist" meant anything in official U.S. discourse, it meant a non-state group that engages in violence.  Now "terrorist" appears to mean any state or non-state group that engages in violence if that violence is not supported by Dick Cheney and George W. Bush. 

At other times, though, the word "terrorist" appears to include anyone without white skin who immigrates to the land of the Statue of Liberty.  Congressman David Davis, who I believe represents this district, has introduced a total of two bills in Congress.  One of them would take the important step of establishing a national Bald Eagle Day.  The other would train state and local police officers in how to protect us from immigrants and/or terrorists.  Now, tell me if I'm right: I'm guessing that the people of Tennessee are not as ignorant and xenophobic as the honorable David Davis appears to be.

Davis may have just been in Washington too long.  A week is too long for most people.  The Senate right now is trying to decide whether to make our next top law enforcement official a man who refuses to say whether waterboarding constitutes torture.  Former Mayor of New York Rudy Giuliani thinks that's a topic worth joking about, just as Donald Rumsfeld did.  But as of late Thursday Rumsfeld now faces five lawsuits charging him with torture, and the number of countries he cannot safely enter continues to grow. 

Meanwhile the White House finally has an answer to global warming: it brings health benefits.  Of course, it also does not exist.  And Fox News blames the fires in California on "al Qaeda."  But none of these absurdities match the one uttered this week by the Chair of the Democratic Caucus Rahm Emmanuel, who said that what we voted for last year was not an end to the war, but legislative action on lots of issues.  The reason only 11 percent of us now support what Congress is doing, Emmanuel said, has nothing to do with the Democrats' refusal to stop funding the occupation.  Rather, he said, we ignorant citizens have too many demands and we're too impatient. 

- Advertisement -

You're damn right we're impatient!  This is the same Rahm Emmanuel who in January told the Washington Post that the Democrats would keep the war going until November 2008.  That's two years of killing and dying, to be followed almost certainly by four more years of killing and dying.  If we are going to end the occupation of Iraq, we are going to have to do it in the next several months.  One way we can do that is by pressuring our Congress Members.  But there are other ways as well.  We can tell potential military recruits what war looks like.  One thing recruiters will never mention is Depleted Uranium. 

Last September a group of Iraq Veterans Against the War were arrested during a tour of the Pentagon.  Their offense was to have set a stack of brochures on a literature table.  The brochures described the possible effects of Depleted Uranium, from which one of the veterans was quite possibly suffering. 

Not only are veterans opposing this occupation, but active duty troops are refusing as illegal their orders to deploy.  Whistleblowers in the military and in Washington are speaking out.  War profiteers are facing charges for corrupt practices.  All of these forces help to end the occupation and discourage the next attack.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

David Swanson is the author of "When the World Outlawed War," "War Is A Lie" and "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union." He blogs at and and works for the online (more...)

David Swanson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Feith Dares Obama to Enforce the Law

Obama's Open Forum Opens Possibilities

Public Forum Planned on Vermont Proposal to Arrest Bush and Cheney

Did Bush Sr. Kill Kennedy and Frame Nixon?

Eleven Excellent Reasons Not to Join the Military

Holder Asked to Prosecute Blankenship