Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
General News

9/11 Qui Tam Jurisdictional Challenges Filed - 2/29/08

By       Message RuGBYZHG       (Page 1 of 9 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   9 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 5407
- Advertisement -


Two Qui Tam cases - U.S. District Court, SDNY -- 9/11 related

- Advertisement -

One alleges Twin Towers destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons

Other alleges No Planes hit the towers

- Advertisement -

Directed energy weapons toxic effects continue at Ground Zero


Jerry V. Leaphart,

- Advertisement -

Attorney for Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Morgan Reynolds

p -- 203-825-6265

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Assisting in the research of 9/11 since 2006. Only physical evidence observable through pictures or measurement data should be considered to determine what happened at all three sites. Hearsay and unsupported hypotheses must be dismissed and (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Propaganda vs. Projection: What is really the truth?

9/11 Qui Tam Jurisdictional Challenges Filed - 2/29/08