Action Alert: Say No to Prohibited Software in Voting Machines!
December 29, 2005
VoteTrustUSA has launched a campaign to hold the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) accountable for ensuring that all Diebold software is re-inspected and decertified until it can be shown that all prohibited code has been removed. We also urge the EAC to initiate the re-inspection of the election software of other vendors, which may also include software that is expressly forbidden in the FEC Voting System Standards. Please go to our action page and send an email to the EAC voicing your concern about the use of prohibited software on voting machines.
In December, newspapers across the country reported that computer experts in Florida had conclusively proven that the "electronic ballot box " in Diebold optical scan vote counting systems could undetectably alter the results of an election. Within days, California 's Secretary of State reported that the use of banned software affects Diebold 's touch-screen voting system as well, a fact which Diebold has acknowledged.
This breach of security exploits an inherently insecure feature of the Diebold optical scanners and touch screens known as interpreted code, which the Federal Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) of 1990 and 2002 specifically prohibit. For further details about how Diebold uses interpreted code and why it is banned from use in voting software, please click here.
How did the ITA overlook such an obvious violation of federal standards in the first place? And just as importantly, do the voting systems produced by Diebold 's competitors contain similarly prohibited code?
It is time to put the EAC on notice that violations of federal standards by the ITA, which is now under their jurisdiction, will not be tolerated by voters.
"Make Every Vote Count, Count Every Vote."
Executive Director www.votersunite.org and
Information Manager www.votetrustusa.org
VotersUnite! is a national non-partisan organization dedicated to fair and accurate elections. It focuses on distributing well-researched information to elections officials, elected officials, the media, and the public; as well as providing activists with information they need to work toward transparent elections in their communities.