Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Surgeon General nominee's position on homosexuality flies in face of science

By       Message Constance Lavender       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments


Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 2002
- Advertisement -
The American Objectivist philosopher Ayn Rand famously cited homosexuality as immoral despite espousing a philosophy based on eudaimonia and invidualism. Contemporary apologists for Rand's position on homosexuality have excused her admission on all the usual grounds: her view reflected the prevailing POV on homosexuality at the time (I would argue, in fact, that it did not), it was just her personal view and not associated with her philosophical views, ad nauseum.
More disturbing, however, is the nomination of James Holsinger by George W Bush to be the next United States Surgeon General; a nomination the Congress will hear this Thursday. Holsinger, a fundamentalist Christian, has opposed homosexuality, like Rand, on moral grounds. The difference between Rand and Holsinger, now that homosexuality has gone mainstream, is, yep, that Holsinger's proponents argue his views of the morality of homosexuality should not be "misconstrued" as his personal views.
First and foremost, the responsibility of the US Surgeon General is to serve as the nation's chief public health official. That service should be premised on the nomination of a qualified person who respects and endorses science, and puts science into the service of promoting and protecting the public health; especially for those citizens most vulnerable because of socio-economic, cultural, and historical factors.
The misuse of science to the detriment of society's most vulnerable members has been evident in numerous historical instances: the Tuskeegee syphilis experiments, electro-shock and LSD treatment for homosexuals.
- Advertisement -
The notion that homosexuallity---whether in humans or penguins or any other species---is "unnatural," and therefore "immoral," is about as scientific as saying that there is no such thing as a blue moon.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Constance Lavender is an HIV-Positive pseudonymous freelance e-journalist from a little isle off the coast of Jersey; New Jersey, that is...

In the Best spirit of Silence Dogood and Benj. Franklin, Ms. Lavender believes that a free (more...)
 

Constance Lavender Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Heterosexism and the African American Community

Stay Tuned...NJ Corruption Probe Extended To Other States

Deviating from the Norm: A Deviant Analysis of Kate Chopin's The Awakening as Coming Out Story

The Hero Myth in Maya Art & Culture

The Hero Cycle in Maya Myth & Culture

Now that Wall Street has been bailed out, where are the rest of US going?