Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 33 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/8/13

Washington Doesn't Work? Oh Really?

Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Jonas
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)

"Washington Doesn't Work," or "Washington Just Doesn't Work," or "Washington: the Gridlock has to be Broken," or some such. One hears it on the media all the time, both reactionary and liberal: Fox"News"Channel, Joe Scarborough, Ed Schultz, and certainly on CNN. "We've got to fix "Washington.' " But is it really true that "Washington doesn't work" and that it "Has to be fixed?" Well, it all depends. It all depends who you are and what your interests are. There surely is gridlock in the Congress and between the Congress and the President, most of the time, as demonstrated by what will have happened, or not happened, by the time this column, written at around 6:00PM EST on Jan. 1 makes its way onto the internet. But that doesn't mean "it doesn't work." It works just fine for a variety of interested parties, taken here in no particular order. (And the so-called cliff-hanger sure did for the most part benefit the GOP and the wealthy, see, for example, the footnotes, below, from The Huffington Post and the Citizens for Tax Justice.)

For example, Washington works just fine for the gun industry, that is the gun and ammunition manufacturers and the gun dealers. Nothing that can get in the way of their continued sales of weapons and ammunition, the main interest of the NRA's major funders, those very industries, gets through Congress. And the same Congress makes sure that the Executive Branch can do nothing on its own about the gun problem, even if it wanted to. A majority of the Congress is owned by that dreadful alliance and no meaningful legislation will ever get through it as long as that state of affairs is maintained, no matter how many Newtowns there might be.

Just consider how clever the NRA is, converting the debate in the aftermath of Newtown from one over some minimal approaches to gun control to one over whether there should be armed guards in every school (like there was at Columbine) and whether teachers should be armed (think "Gunfight at the OK teachers' lounge). As for the Executive Branch, they have left the position of Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms unfilled for six years. That gap not only affects the gunners but also affects the two even larger killers of US citizens, the tobacco and alcohol industries, (440,000 and 65,000-100,000 deaths per year, depending upon how one counts).

Washington works just fine if you are a major smoke polluter. Very early in his first term, Obama dropped any pretence of going after cap-and-trade legislation and it works just fine if the last thing you want is any set of meaningful measures to deal with global warming and climate change.

Washington works just fine if you are a wealthy person, a la Mitt Romney, who has stashed a good deal of wealth overseas, beyond the reach of the IRS. For all the talk of "tax reform" and "fixing the tax code" that comes out of both parties, if such initiatives were ever to get down to the nitty-gritty in the House and Senate committees concerned with such matters you could bet your bottom dollar that the lobbyists would tie those committees in knots and any meaningful reform would become a dead letter.

Washington works just fine if you are Grover Norquist and your real aim is not "no new taxes" but "shrinking the size of the Federal government to the size of a bathtub and then drowning it in the bathtub" (1). Of course by that phrase Grover means those sections of the Federal government he doesn't like: the non-military/non-prison operational arms, the paid-for benefits programs, and virtually any form of regulation. His game was in fact given away when the final form of the "pulling-back-from-the-fiscal-cliff" "compromise" was being negotiated. Grover said that an agreement that included certain tax increases on the very wealthy was OK with him (2). Why? Because he was fairly salivating over the unspecified spending cuts that would be part of any deal, spending cuts to that tiny proportion of the Federal government beyond the paid-for benefits programs, that provide real services (like say air traffic control, infrastructure construction, and the National Weather Service) to real people, that would be fully controlled by his beloved GOP-front Tea party in the House.

Washington works just fine if you are one of the various beneficiaries of the so-called "War on Drugs:" the prison industrial complex; the drug cartels (whose business and enormous profits would go to zero were the "war" to be ended); the tobacco and alcohol industries (which might see attention turned to the real killer substances, the drug and drug carriers that they produce and sell); the pharmaceutical industry (that might be called to account for the epidemic of pain-killer addiction that has gained such a prominent place in the real drug-use problem); the gun industry (which benefits from the selling of illegal guns both here and abroad); and so on and so forth. Even with marijuana legalization starting to take hold, there are few politicians ready to risk it all for an all-out assault on this "war" that originated as a complement to Nixon's racist "Southern Strategy."

Washington works just fine if you are the oil or factory farm industries, with their huge subsidies that aren't going to end anytime soon.

And of course Washington works just fine if you are part of the military/industrial complex. You may see a real drop in money spent, as part of the resolution of the "fiscal cliff" crisis, but a) in percentage terms it isn't so great, and b) apparently a significant chunk of the savings will be coming out of the hides, literally, of service members and civilian employees, in one way or another.

And so on and so forth. The primary point here is that the State, that is the legislative, executive and judicial branches (see Citizens United) of government works in the interest not of the "We the People of the United States" which supposedly are the underpinning of the Constitution (see that least-read part of it, the Preamble), but in the interests of the economic ruling class of the United States. As that great socialist (sic) Teddy Roosevelt said in an August, 1912, speech when he was running for President under the banner of the Bull Moose Party (3): " Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day." In this, the great TR was actually several years ahead of a now obscure Russian political scientist named VI Ulyanov who in 1917 published a whole book on the subject, entitled The State and Revolution.

When the political commentators cited at the beginning of this column talk about "Washington not working" they are referring to either some abstract concept of "working" or to legislation, judicial decisions, and regulatory policies that would actually benefit the majority of "We the People of the United States." But as long as the ruling class, and you know who they are, remains in control of the state, that ain't going to happen.


1. Jonas, S., "Grover Norquist's Wet Dream," . April 20, 2011.

2. " Norquist Throws His Support Behind Biden-McConnell Plan," Newsmax,

3. Nader, R., " Compare the 1912 Elections with the 2012 Elections,"


Steven Jonas, MD, MPH is a Professor of Preventive Medicine at Stony Brook University (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 30 books. In addition to being a columnist for BuzzFlash@Truthout he is the Managing Editor of and a Contributing Author to The Political Junkies for Progressive Democracy.

Footnotes :

Fiscal Cliff Deal Sneaks In Wall Street Gifts, NASCAR Perk

Posted: 01/02/2013 8:38 pm EST | Updated: 01/03/2013 10:17 am EST (Huff Post)

The 11th-hour deal to avert the so-called fiscal cliff preserved billions of dollars in corporate tax giveaways even as it slashed take-home pay for millions of American workers.

Tucked inside the last-minute fiscal cliff package were more than a dozen tax loopholes, many of which will benefit Wall Street financial firms and some of the nation's biggest corporations. These breaks will cost billions of dollars in the coming year, underscoring the lobbying power of corporate interests.

The deal was less kind to the middle class. Congress permitted a cut in the payroll tax to expire, meaning that the tax burden for the average worker will increase about $1,000 in 2013.

"This shows that the lobbyists are able to get what they want even when everyone else is starving," said Phineas Baxandall, senior analyst for tax and budget policy at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. "It also shows they are best able to get what they want when no one else is paying attention."

The corporate loopholes were part of a package of so-called tax extenders tacked onto the main bill. The extenders package, first approved by the Senate in early August, mixes popular benefits, like a deduction for teachers who buy classroom supplies, with corporate-friendly carve-outs, such as the "active financing" exception that permits businesses earning interest on overseas lending to defer U.S. taxes on that income indefinitely. There is even a tax break for construction of new racetracks.

The tax extenders were passed for only one year, and they still need to clear another potential hurdle: upcoming negotiations over mandated spending cuts and the debt ceiling. President Barack Obama and congressional leaders have indicated they'd like to see a "grand bargain" on taxes, which would feature lower overall rates but close a slew of loopholes.

The financial services industry, whose leaders had earlier joined a group of other corporate executives pushing for a "fair" solution to the fiscal crisis, is one of the primary beneficiaries of special-interest tax breaks. The active-financing exception, for example, permits banks like Morgan Stanley to avoid the 35 percent U.S. corporate tax rate on interest income from money lent overseas. A handful of other U.S.-based multinational companies with financing arms, such as Ford Motor Co. and General Electric, also use that exemption to lower their tax bills. The two-year cost to taxpayers is an estimated $11.2 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.


CTJ's Tax Justice Digest ( )

New CTJ Report: Revenue Impacts of the Fiscal Cliff Deal ( 2013/01/revenue_impacts_of_ the_fiscal_cliff_deal.php )
While the White House and members of Congress have described the fiscal cliff deal as raising $620 billion in revenue, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), the official revenue estimator for Congress, has projected that it will actually reduce revenue by $3.9 trillion over a decade. The widely-used $620 billion figure is calculated by comparing the bill's provisions making permanent most of the Bush-era tax cuts to a proposal for making permanent all the Bush-era tax cuts. As this report explains, the revenue "savings" is likely to be offset by the business tax cuts that are also included in the bill and which are now likely to be extended over and over throughout the decade and beyond...
Read More

New CTJ Report: Poorest Three-Fifths of Americans Get Just 18% of the Tax Cuts in the Fiscal Cliff Deal
The fiscal cliff deal approved by the Senate and House on New Year's Day cuts taxes substantially compared to the tax policies that would be in effect if Congress had allowed all temporary tax cuts to expire. The deal cuts taxes even for the richest Americans but directs only a fraction of the overall tax cuts to low- and middle-income Americans...
Read More

A Tax Cut By Any Other Name

The term "Bush tax cuts," which dominated fiscal debates for far too long, is now history. But the legacy of these tax cuts endures in our crippling deficit and our growing economic inequality. And now, thanks to President Obama and the 112th Congress, they will continue to distort our tax system into the foreseeable future. When the Senate passed legislation based on the deal, we ran the numbers and published our results on New Year's Day...
Read More

Rate It | View Ratings

Steven Jonas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at StonyBrookMedicine (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 35 books. In addition to his position on OpEdNews as a ├ éČ┼"Trusted Author,├ éČ Ł he is a Senior (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend