"Washington Doesn't Work," or "Washington Just Doesn't Work,"
or "Washington: the Gridlock has to be Broken," or some such. One hears it on
the media all the time, both reactionary and liberal: Fox"News"Channel, Joe
Scarborough, Ed Schultz, and certainly on CNN. "We've got to fix "Washington.' "
But is it really true that "Washington doesn't work" and that it "Has to be
fixed?" Well, it all depends. It all depends who you are and what your interests
are. There surely is gridlock in the Congress and between the Congress and the
President, most of the time, as demonstrated by what will have happened, or not
happened, by the time this column, written at around 6:00PM EST on Jan. 1 makes
its way onto the internet. But that doesn't mean "it doesn't work." It works
just fine for a variety of interested parties, taken here in no particular
order. (And the so-called cliff-hanger sure did for the most part benefit the
GOP and the wealthy, see, for example, the footnotes, below, from The
Huffington Post and the Citizens for Tax Justice.)
For example, Washington works just fine for the gun industry, that is the gun and ammunition manufacturers and the gun dealers. Nothing that can get in the way of their continued sales of weapons and ammunition, the main interest of the NRA's major funders, those very industries, gets through Congress. And the same Congress makes sure that the Executive Branch can do nothing on its own about the gun problem, even if it wanted to. A majority of the Congress is owned by that dreadful alliance and no meaningful legislation will ever get through it as long as that state of affairs is maintained, no matter how many Newtowns there might be.
consider how clever the NRA is, converting the debate in the aftermath of
Newtown from one over some minimal approaches to gun control to one over whether
there should be armed guards in every school (like there was at Columbine) and
whether teachers should be armed (think "Gunfight at the OK teachers' lounge).
As for the Executive Branch, they have left the position of Director of the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms unfilled for six years. That gap not
only affects the gunners but also affects the two even larger killers of US
citizens, the tobacco and alcohol industries, (440,000 and 65,000-100,000 deaths
per year, depending upon how one counts).
Washington works just fine if you are a major smoke polluter. Very early in his first term, Obama dropped any pretence of going after cap-and-trade legislation and it works just fine if the last thing you want is any set of meaningful measures to deal with global warming and climate change.
Washington works just fine if you are Grover Norquist and your real
aim is not "no new taxes" but "shrinking the size of the Federal government to
the size of a bathtub and then drowning it in the bathtub" (1). Of course by
that phrase Grover means those sections of the Federal government he doesn't
like: the non-military/non-prison operational arms, the paid-for benefits
programs, and virtually any form of regulation. His game was in fact given away
when the final form of the "pulling-back-from-the-fiscal-cliff" "compromise" was
being negotiated. Grover said that an agreement that included certain tax
increases on the very wealthy was OK with him (2). Why? Because he was fairly
salivating over the unspecified spending cuts that would be part of any deal,
spending cuts to that tiny proportion of the Federal government beyond the
paid-for benefits programs, that provide real services (like say air traffic
control, infrastructure construction, and the National Weather Service) to real
people, that would be fully controlled by his beloved GOP-front Tea party in the
Washington works just fine if you are one of the various beneficiaries of the so-called "War on Drugs:" the prison industrial complex; the drug cartels (whose business and enormous profits would go to zero were the "war" to be ended); the tobacco and alcohol industries (which might see attention turned to the real killer substances, the drug and drug carriers that they produce and sell); the pharmaceutical industry (that might be called to account for the epidemic of pain-killer addiction that has gained such a prominent place in the real drug-use problem); the gun industry (which benefits from the selling of illegal guns both here and abroad); and so on and so forth. Even with marijuana legalization starting to take hold, there are few politicians ready to risk it all for an all-out assault on this "war" that originated as a complement to Nixon's racist "Southern Strategy."
And of course Washington works just fine if you are part of the military/industrial complex. You may see a real drop in money spent, as part of the resolution of the "fiscal cliff" crisis, but a) in percentage terms it isn't so great, and b) apparently a significant chunk of the savings will be coming out of the hides, literally, of service members and civilian employees, in one way or another.
And so on and so forth. The primary point here is that the State, that is the legislative, executive and judicial branches (see Citizens United) of government works in the interest not of the "We the People of the United States" which supposedly are the underpinning of the Constitution (see that least-read part of it, the Preamble), but in the interests of the economic ruling class of the United States. As that great socialist (sic) Teddy Roosevelt said in an August, 1912, speech when he was running for President under the banner of the Bull Moose Party (3): " Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day." In this, the great TR was actually several years ahead of a now obscure Russian political scientist named VI Ulyanov who in 1917 published a whole book on the subject, entitled The State and Revolution.
When the political commentators cited at the beginning of this column talk about "Washington not working" they are referring to either some abstract concept of "working" or to legislation, judicial decisions, and regulatory policies that would actually benefit the majority of "We the People of the United States." But as long as the ruling class, and you know who they are, remains in control of the state, that ain't going to happen.
Jonas, S., "Grover Norquist's Wet Dream," http://blog.buzzflash.com/node/12601 . April 20, 2011.
3. Nader, R., " Compare the 1912 Elections with the 2012 Elections," http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33492.htm