57 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

Thoughts on JFK Assassination (2023)

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Capasse
Become a Fan

60 years gone. And through all that time, we are still told the "Oswald Tale".

In a January 22, '64, Executive Session of the Warren Commission, Allen Dulles expressed concerns over the rumors that Lee Oswald was some sort of government agent, that he may have been used, or had knowledge of a bigger plot, possibly withheld by the FBI or Intelligence Community. The members had also come to the realization that, they were being led to,"...support the [FBI] conclusions...". They were questioning their very existence, and purpose, and the long-term consequences for what they have resigned themselves to do.

Dulles: "...why would it be particularly in their interest -- I could see, it would be in their interest to get rid of this man but why would it be in their interest to say he is clearly the only guilty one? I mean I don't see that argument that you raise particularly shows an interest.... If he was not the killer and they employed him, they are already it, you see. So your argument is correct if they are sure that this is going to close the case, but if it don't close the case, they are worse off than ever by doing this."

That's really where it's at, after all these years. Isn't it? It hasn't closed the case, and it's worse off than ever. Thru all this time, there has been nothing released that has strengthened or fortified the 'Oswald Theory'. Even the latest nonsensical-sounding account by Secret Service Agent, Paul Landis, doesn't 'better' the official narrative. In fact, he refers to a back wound that cannot be explained, and corroborates 2 Parkland nurses that saw a bullet in the ER room.

Each time, one of these stories comes out, the Commission defenders tout the line, "nothing here... therefore Oswald did it." Yet, the case against Oswald is weak and circumstantial. Closer examination of the evidence finds it broken and inconsistent. The existence of so many loose ends, in a case so important, is the proof of a blatant and obvious conspiracy, then coverup. In all the document releases, there has been no new revelation to provide any solid facts necessary to prove it was Lee. If that could be proven, then all the conspiracy theories would have gone away a long time ago.

Hoover, and the FBI, were in complete control of what the members received based on its requests for further inquiry. The Commission had no investigators of its own, and had to rely solely on the agency for what they could get. Often times, the FBI response to these questions, provided inadequate proof against Oswald, while avoiding anything contrary. In the same closed-door session, General Council, J. Lee Rankin, said: "They found the man. There is nothing more to do. The Commission supports their conclusions, and we can go on home and that is the end of it"

It was over before it began. There has never been an official independent investigation to get to bottom of it before everyone died. The HSCA had the time and opportunity to uncover a great many things and actually hold people accountable. That was not to be. Once that inquiry turned to New Orleans, and the US government's involved with anti Castro forces in the area, it was shut down.

George Joannides served as the liaison from the CIA to the HSCA. It was revealed many years later, he had direct connections to Oswald. Washington Post reporter, Jefferson Morley, "... the spy withheld information about his own actions in 1963 from the congressional investigators he was supposed to be assisting. It wasn't until 2001, 38 years after Kennedy's death, that Joannides' support for the Cuban exiles, who clashed with Oswald and monitored him, came to light."

And so, they are "worse off than ever" by doing this, just as what's left cannot toll for the truth. "... a steeple full of swallows, that could never ring the bell." >>Tom Waits

Nov. 22, 2023
- 2023 Michael Capasse
jfk.boards.net/

Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Capasse Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

My name is Michael Capasse. I am a critic of the Warren Commission's conclusions in the JFK assassination. I have studied the case since 1973, and consider it an ongoing, open investigation. In the 50 years I have read about the murder, I've (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Thoughts on JFK Assassination (2023)

Standing in the Doorway

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend