Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 30 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 7/4/11

The Wisdom of the People - the Populist Rationale

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   9 comments, In Series: The Money Party
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Collins
Become a Fan
  (120 fans)

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

The citizens of the United States have excellent judgment.  They have shown it consistently over time.  When that judgment shifts briefly allowing a failed policy, it is a result of the vilest forms of propaganda by a small clique of liars. (Image: PS-OV-ART)

The people were right about the invasion of Iraq

We know that the plan to invade Iraq began just days after Inauguration Day, 2001.  The opportunity to launch the most disastrous and costly military effort in our history came on 9/11.  The destruction of the World Trade Center towers and attack on the Pentagon became the pretext for war. The manipulators launched their fraudulent storyline in earnest with confidence that they would get their war.

But in December of 2002, the public wasn't buying it.  The people didn't have access to all of the information.  They knew one thing for sure -- the invasion was a very bad idea unless Iraq posed an imminent threat to the country with weapons of mass destruction.  An in depth Los Angeles Times public opinion poll asked this question:

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

The rulers needed to pull out all the stops to get their war.  They sent a national icon, General Colin Powell, to lie to the world as he waved a vile of supposed chemical weapons at the United Nations.  Then President Bush lied in his 2003 state of the union address to Congress about Iraq's nuclear potential.  This shameless manipulation of our worst fears came as a direct result of the wisdom of the people rejecting a contrived invasion.  When the public fails to cooperate, extraordinary measures are implemented.

The people were right about the bailout

Another instance of the people's wisdom came in the days leading up to the first bailout vote following the 2008 Wall Street-big bank collapse.  Then Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson put together a generous bailout for the most favored banks and investment houses.  The goasl were to keep them in business, to preserve their bonuses, and to cover up the various schemes that caused the crisis in the first place.

The people knew better.  The spontaneous outpouring of public demands that Congress reject the bailout came at a rate never seen before.  The first bailout was defeated 228 to 205, with only two members failing to show up for the vote.  The anti-bailout coalition included arch liberals Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) and Bobby Scott (D-VA), the very right wing Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), and libertarian Ron Paul (R-TX).

The financial elite were shocked by this outcome.  They marshaled their forces, calling back both presidential candidates to endorse the bailout.  Financial pressure was applied.  More ominously, Secretary Paulson claimed that the financial chaos absent a bailout would be the equivalent of a massive heart attack.   The bailouts passed on the next vote propping up the perpetrators of the crash and guaranteeing their fat-cat bonuses.

The pubic was right again.

Who pays attention to the public?  Not our leaders.  There was a time when ordinary people rose up and offered a declaration based on the people's wisdom.

A Populist Manifesto

One of the earliest populist declarations applies directly to the challenges we face right now. It represented a bold assertion from those denied the benefits of their labor.  These were not experts.  They were, by and large, farmers.  They were not Ivy League graduates.  But their education was sufficient to generate a revolutionary statement addressing the massive inequalities of their time.

The decades following the Civil War were challenging to both urban and rural citizens.  By 1892, a Populist Party emerged with a manifesto that is highly relevant to our times.  The movement had some successes and then unraveled when some leaders diverted the  movement from its core economic principals and openness to divisive politics including racism and religious bigotry.  This diversion has been the undoing of populist candidates and movements since that time.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Valuable 7   Supported 6   Must Read 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Collins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend