Send a Tweet
- Advertisement -
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 8/2/19

The Trump Administration Is Coming After WhatsApp

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   3 comments
Author 87840
Message Trevor Timm
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

From Medium

- Advertisement -
Attorney General William Barr has made clear his desire to dismantle the security of our encryption services

New WHATSAPP Style iPhone on android 2019 in its latest updates
New WHATSAPP Style iPhone on android 2019 in its latest updates
(Image by YouTube, Channel: AndroFanaticos)
  Details   DMCA

Just as Americans face yet another devastating data breach this time with the Capital One credit card servers the Trump administration seems bent on weakening our collective cyber-security even further.

It's hard to count the number of recent devastating cyber-security episodes, whether it's on Capital One, Equifax, or the U.S. government itself. With these attacks on an uptick, it's been encouraging to see a corresponding rise in chat applications that offer end-to-end encryption a boon to everyone's privacy and security.

- Advertisement -

Messaging apps like WhatsApp, iMessage, and Signal provide consumers strong safeguards, where everyone's messages are encrypted by default even the companies that own the message applications can't access them. These services are collectively providing billions of people with protections to prevent their messages from landing in the next massive data dump (not to mention helping to protect everyone from government mass surveillance). Device encryption, too, is becoming standard on cellphones. Even Apple, for example, can't unlock an iPhone that is encrypted with a passcode.

But Attorney General William Barr wants to change all that. Last week, he delivered an ominous speech in which he claimed the U.S. government's patience with tech companies offering strong encryption is wearing thin, and that a law banning strong encryption or requiring companies build in back doors for the government could soon become a reality.

Even though Barr said improving cyber-security was a "national imperative" he added that the government would "welcome these improvements to privacy and security, and will work to preserve and strengthen them." He then spent the entirety of his talk explaining the government's desire to weaken these same technologies that are protecting billions of people so that it might gain access to conversations when it pleases.

- Advertisement -

"By enabling dangerous criminals to cloak their communications and activities behind an essentially impenetrable digital shield, the deployment of warrant-proof encryption is already imposing huge costs on society," Barr claimed. "It seriously degrades the ability of law enforcement to detect and prevent crime before it occurs."

While Barr acknowledges it's clear that end-to-end encryption (which he dubbed "irresponsible encryption") provides some consumer protections, he claims it weakens people's overall safety and national security at the same time.

Barr acts is if consumer protection is small bore compared to national security. First, encryption is protecting more than just our private information. After Apple implemented strong encryption protections on the iPhone, phone theft -- one of the most common crimes in New York City -- plummeted because the phones became almost useless to criminals. Of course, phone thefts, when done by robbery, can often become violent.

Protecting this type of information is also a national security issue. After the Clinton campaign was hacked in 2016, Clinton staffers were told to move over to Signal to better protect their communications from foreign governments.

Since then, use of encrypted apps by aides in Congress and campaign staff has only increased. In fact, there's an easy story any journalist can write if the debate over encryption heats up again in Congress. To any lawmaker who is advocating for a ban on strong encryption, simply ask them: Do you, your staff, or your campaign to use Signal or another encrypted messaging app to protect your communications? The answer will most likely be yes.

Of course, this is not to say that criminals will never use encrypted messaging apps. It's true that surveilling the content of messages may be a little harder for governments, but they are also operating in what many have called "the golden age of surveillance," where virtually everyone carries around a cellphone 24/7, which can act as a tracking beacon for their exact whereabouts, who they are talking to, and how often.

- Advertisement -

We are in a much better position providing more protections for our data, not less.

Security experts across the political spectrum (even some well-known former intelligence officials) have explained that creating a back door opens up all sorts of cyber-security nightmares, and we are in a much better position providing more protections for our data, not less. If the companies can access our data, and the FBI can as well, it's inevitable that foreign governments or criminals will too.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Trevor Timm Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and lawyer who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He has contributed to  The (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's New NSA Bill Will Codify and Extend Mass Surveillance of Americans

Everyone loves Bernie Sanders. Except, it seems, the Democratic party

DOJ Investigation of AP Part of Larger Pattern to Intimidate Sources and Reporters

Why the Panama Papers should be a US election issue

If Trump leaks are OK and Clinton leaks aren't, there's a problem

One good thing about Donald Trump's campaign: it's ruining Jeb Bush's

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 3000 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Barr, and all the rest pushing to either outlaw encryption or build in a back door for the spooks, know precisely what is wrong with either proposal.

It's just another bogus attempt to weaken the flow of truth. And, it's not a very feasible plan. In addition to what was discussed, they'd also have to outlaw things like VPNs, encrypted social media, and maybe even https protocol. Yeah... right... whatever you say!

Submitted on Friday, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:34:05 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jan 22, 2008), 38 fans, 70 articles, 432 quicklinks, 5610 comments, 48 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Be aware of Trump's favorite book, Mein Kampf, and be aware of recent Supreme Court decisions weakened, nay decimating, the Constitution. Be afraid, be very afraid.

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 3, 2019 at 11:49:11 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 3000 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

You wouldn't catch me using WhatsApp, now that Facebook has it. If you want your encryption to be of any use, it can't be attached to a centralized, data mining surveillance giant. What's the point in that?

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 3, 2019 at 6:40:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment