Questions Must Be Asked, New Demands Raised, More Needs Put On Agenda
By Danny Schechter
Author of PLUNDER
It is time for a euphoria check or maybe a check on euphoria, a time to start raising our own questions about government plans rather than reflexively rallying behind the Democrats just because the Republicans are so obstinate and revolting.
It is important to recognize that behind the GOP’s JUST SAY NO rejectionism is a calculated reaction. If it succeeds, they look stupid. If it fails as many expect it will, they can say, “see we told you so” as part of a plan to stage a political comeback in two years. Rush Limbaugh may have the moxie to call for its failure but many of his party mates are more cagey.
“(The economy) won’t recover anytime soon. It is likely to get significantly worse over the course of 2009 no matter what President Obama and Congress do. If you look at the world through a hyper-partisan lens like they do, the silver lining is clear. Wait it out and then make political hay off everyone’s misery.”
So we need to forget them and stop bashing them as if they are important. Let’s instead temper our outrage and focus instead on what can be done and what we want done.
That said, we have to recognize we do not live in a perfect world or a world of our choosing. There is no question that the government must act. But how—and what is the likely impact? Already there is fear and loathing in liberal circles. Tom Friedman assures us ‘there is no magic bullet.” Frank Rich concedes that the “house stimulus bill is an inevitably imperfect hodge-podge in process.” Barney Frank tries to turn the tables on adversaries by reminding them how wasteful Iraq spending is.
The plan to be announced this week touches many political bases, and predictably has already attracted flak from right and left. The Repugs are always on the lookout for pork—except in their own military industrial complex subsidies. There is no question that there is money in the bill that is unlikely to lead to job creation. Despite the failure of tax cuts in the past, the Repugs crank up that broken record as their panacea.
On the left, there is concern that despite all the Wall Street bashing from the White House, the financial servides industry has already deeply infiltrated itself into the new Administration which is still committed to transferring public funds into private hands. Economist Michael Hudson who is quoted in my book PLUNDER reminds us that "a crisis caused in part by zooming debt can’t be solved by taking on more”.
“The government’s solution, placed in its hands by the financial lobbyists, is to bail out the bankers and Wall Street while leaving the ‘real’ economy even more highly indebted. Families, businesses and government are having to spend more wage income, profits and tax revenues on debt service instead of buying goods and services. So why is the solution to this debt overhead held to be yet MORE debt? Is there not something crazy here?”
David Sollars of Washburn University raises some questions we also can’t avoid, writing, “Even a cursory look at the bill being rushed through the Congress reveals its Frankenstein-type nature. It is a wish list for unrelated spending programs that, on their own, would not be considered reasonable. Even the parts that make some sense, like the much-touted infrastructure spending, are small potatoes in the bill. Instead we get millions for the National Endowment for the Arts. The Department of Education gets $66 billion for . . . well, we aren’t sure, but how can you be opposed to education?"