Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/14/13

The Russian Loophole: Syria enters the UN Convention that enabled its chemical weapons program

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 81162
Message Abigail W. Adams

"The Russian government was in some kind of trouble," Vil Mirzayanov, a dissident Soviet chemist from Russia's chemical-weapons program, said of the diplomatic solution that pushed Syria to join the Chemical-Weapons Convention (CWC) on October 14.   "Ultimately, there are people that can reveal the old connections.   All these chemical weapons of Syria, they are a version of Russian chemical weapons.   The Russian government probably felt there was only one solution, so to cover their ass they pushed Syria to join the convention."  

Syria's entrance into the CWC was met with a geo-political sigh of relief.   U.S. military intervention in Syria's civil war had been averted.   The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the CWC's investigative and enforcement arm, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.   The Russians, the major force behind the initiative to transfer Syria's chemical stockpiles into international control, were hailed for their diplomatic maneuvering.   Ironically, the Russians, the heroes behind Syria's public denunciation of their chemical-weapons program, were responsible for the establishment of Syria's chemical-weapons program.   Loopholes Russian negotiators inserted into the CWC made it possible.


The Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling, and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, or the Chemical-Weapons Convention, was the accumulation of 20 years of negotiations by the UN Conference on Disarmament.   After the disastrous results of the use of chemical agents during WWI and WWII, the international community drafted numerous resolutions against their use.     As the owners of the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons in the global community, the U.S. and Russia were major stakeholders in the negotiations.   With the lofty goal of eliminating chemical weapons worldwide, the CWC entered into full force at the UN in April 1997.  

"I was well informed in how to create loopholes in this convention," Vil Mirzayanov said in an interview the day after Syria joined the CWC.   "I participated in meetings on how to do that."   For 26 years, Vil Mirzayanov worked as a chemist for the State Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, the center of Russia's chemical-weapons program.   After helping to develop a new wave of chemical-warfare agents that were virtually undetectable by foreign inspectors, known as Novichok, Mirzayanov blew the whistle in 1994.   "I came to the conclusion that mostly chemical weapons are against the civilian population.   After that I decided that it was not good to work on this program anymore.   Especially after Russia developed a new generation of more poisonous and more powerful chemical agents and weaponized them."

After a year of persecution within Russia for divulging state secrets, Vil Mirzayanov immigrated to the United States, where he continued to sound the alarm about Russia's chemical-weapons program.   It went unheeded.   In 1997, both the U.S. and Russia ratified the CWC; the threat of chemical war had superficially subsided.   Until August 21, 2013, when Syria unleashed the worst chemical-weapons attack in nearly two decades.   According to Mirzayanov, the loopholes inserted into the CWC by Russian negotiators made that chemical-weapons attack possible.   Article XI of the CWC, Economic and Technological Development, was the curtain that Russia hid behind to export a new generation of phosphate-based chemical agents to rogue nations.  

According to Article XI of the CWC, the ban on chemical weapons and the monitoring of their precursors will not interfere with their production and use for purposes outside of war.   The article gives the signatories of the convention the right to "develop, produce, acquire, retain, transfer, and use chemicals."   In addition, the CWC encourages the "fullest possible exchange of chemicals, equipment, and scientific and technical information," and prohibits countries from using the CWC to "restrict or impeded trade and the development and promotion of scientific and technological knowledge in the field of chemistry for industrial, agricultural, research, medical, pharma ceutical, or other peaceful purposes."

"Well, what does development mean?" Vil Mirzayanov said when speaking about the loophole he had a personal hand in developing.   "No one can tell you what it means exactly.   You can continue to synthesize new components and you can continue to test them.   This is a very bad loophole because it allows for the development of new kinds of chemical agents."   The new generation of chemical agents that Russia developed while Boris Yeltsin pushed the Russian Parliament to ratify the CWC was done without fear of international interference.   Russia's development of phosphate-based chemical weapons was disguised by their dual-use application for civilian purposes.   The CWC, which grew out of the use of chlorine and phosgene gases during WWI and WWII, enabled its Signatories to engage in a new phase of chemical war--one that involved far deadlier chemical agents.    


Despite public denial, Syria has long been known as the holder of the largest stockpile of chemical weapons in the Middle East.   On August 21, 2013, Bashar al-Assad deployed these weapons against his own citizens in the Ghouta suburb of Damascus, a rebel stronghold.   Surface-to-surface rockets containing Sarin, a nerve agent, killed 1,429--most were civilians.   Russia's initial reaction to the chemical attack by its longtime ally was to launch a public campaign blaming the rebels.   In an Op-Ed piece published by the New York Times on September 11, Vladimir Putin claimed Syrian opposition forces unleashed the chemical weapons to provoke international intervention.   In response to a smaller-scale chemical-weapons attack in Syria in March, Russia conducted an investigation under the guise of the OPCW and submitted a 100-page document to the UN that held the rebels responsible.   When this approach failed, Russia launched its diplomatic initiative to transfer Syria's chemical arsenal to international control.  

Sarin is a debilitating nerve agent that is fatal in even low quantities.   It attacks the nervous system and those who are exposed go through an excruciating process before death that includes loss of control over bodily functions, convulsions, and eventually asphyxiation.   Sarin is one of a series of binary chemical agents that Russia developed while negotiating the CWC.   It is outlawed in the CWC as a schedule I--the most deadly--chemical weapon.   However, Sarin can be produced on the spot by mixing together its precursor chemicals, most notably methylphosphonyl difluoride and isopropanol, or rubbing alcohol.   As early as December 2012, reports emerged that Syria was taking steps to create Sarin from precursors and loading them into missiles.    

In 1994, the same year Vil Mirzayanov was imprisoned for blowing the whistle on Russia's Novichok program, Gen. Anatoly Kuntsevich was smuggling precursor chemicals for nerve gases into Syria.   Gen. Kuntsevich was a leader in Russia's chemical-weapons program.   He was in charge of Russia's Shikany 2 military-chemical facility, won the Lenin Prize in 1991 for developing binary chemical agents for the USSR, and oversaw the Novichok program where Mirzayanov worked.   Kuntsevich, also, served as an advisor to Boris Yeltsin on chemical disarmament, was in charge of Russia's chemical and biological weapons-conversion programs, and was a lead negotiator for Russia on the CWC.   "He was a typical military bureaucrat," Mirzayanov recalled.   "A very dishonest guy."

Kuntsevich's transfer of chemical-weapons components to Syria became the subject of a Russian Security Services investigation--an investigation that was ultimately dropped after Kuntsevich revealed to the press that the smuggled precursor chemicals were part of a legal trade agreement between Russia and Syria.   Mirzayanov chuckled when he spoke of the incident.   "They were probably mad because he figured he could make a few bucks on the side.   Russia was sending tons and tons of these chemicals to Syria, so Kuntsevich figured he could sell some himself and put some money in his pocket."   The precursor components for nerve agents were transferred into Syria under the cover of environmental protection.   The chemical agents were reportedly to support the Pan-Arabian Ecological Center stationed near Damascus.   Kuntsevich was assigned to the program as a representative.   "He was working on environmental-protection problems, but he has no idea what is that," Mirzayanov said.   "That program had to do with chemical-weapons activities."

After his brief period in the media, Kuntsevich drifted away from the public eye.   In 2002, he died under mysterious circumstances on a flight from Aleppo-Moscow.   Rumors abound that his death was a targeted assassination by intelligence agencies attempting to curtail Syria's chemical-weapons program.   The Kuntsevich incident was a rare verifiable glimpse into Russian culpability for Syria's CW capabilities.   The decades-long relationship has also been cited in Special Intelligence Estimates released by the CIA in the 1980s and 1990s; Russia was named the source of the chemical agents, delivery systems and training that enabled the development of Syria's CW program.

Russia is not the only source for the precursor chemicals that allowed Syria to produce Sarin and other nerve agents.   Companies in the U.S., U.K., Germany, and France also supplied the needed precursors for Sarin as late as 2012.   However, Russia is the only country that supplied the on-going military equipment, supplies, technical knowledge, and support to make Syria's CW program operational.   "There's no secret the Assad regime has had significant stockpiles of chemical weapons," Secretary of Defense Charles Hagel said in response to Congressman Joe Wilson's questions during the Sept. 4, 2013, House Foreign Relations Committee.   "The Russians supplied them."

Next Page  1  |  2


Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Abigail W. Adams Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Abigail W. Adams is a freelance researcher and writer. Her areas of expertise include National Security, Middle Eastern Affairs and the financial industry. She is founder of The Information Collective.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Timothy Geithner To Resign: A Dishonorably Honorable Discharge For the Scandal-Ridden Treasure Secretary

The Myth of the Fiscal Cliff: Another False Apocalypse

The Unleashing of Syria's Chemical Weapons

The Russian Loophole: Syria enters the UN Convention that enabled its chemical weapons program

Syria's Inheritance: Who Will Control the Chemical Weapons Stockpiles?

Romney's Shoddy Politicization of the Syria Conflict