How many Americans
know that the current regime in Ukraine was installed in a very bloody February 2014 coup d'etat,
that was planned in the U.S. White House, and overseen by an Assistant
Secretary of State, Victoria Nuland, and run by the CIA, and carried out for
the White House by one of Ukraine's two racist-fascist, or nazi, political parties,
whose founder and leader still controls Ukraine though not officially, even
these many months after his coup, and which nazi party has been up to their
elbows since then in a genocidal policy to exterminate the people in the region
of Ukraine that had voted approximately 90% for the man whom Obama and those
nazis overthrew in February? (Click onto that link, and to the
more-detailed evidence that's linked to there, in order to see the ultimate
documentations of this entire horrific history, because it is history now, even
though the American public were never informed about it while it was news --
while and when it was happening, which it still is.)
And how many Americans know that one of the two main suspects in the bringing-down of the Malaysian MH17 airliner over Ukraine on July 17th has been given veto-power over the report that is to be issued from the official 'investigation' of the black boxes and other evidence in the case?
The ongoing hiding of all of this from the American public is perhaps even more stunning to the present writer than is the bloody American policy (including Obama's personal role in it) itself.
Virtually all of the 'news' editors and producers -- the 'news' executives, in America's press -- know, and have known all along, that these things are the case, because they've been receiving many news-submissions on them, with full and entirely credible documentation each time, ever since February, and have not made any of these facts public; they've not published this reality, when it was news, though they are supposed to be news-organizations.
I know this because I am one of the many independent investigative journalists who has been reporting in detail on these matters, throughout this time-period, and whose reports have been submitted to virtually all U.S. 'news' media -- mainstream and alternative news, liberal and conservative news, Republican and Democratic news. And, with the exception of only about a half-dozen obscure but admirably authentic news-sites on the Internet (which is just a small fraction of the "alternative news" sites), all of this solidly documented information (just click on the links and you'll see it documented there) has been intentionally withheld, from the American public, by virtually the entirety of the U.S. 'news' media.
Was the rigid control over a nation's press more rigid and more universal in the Soviet Union, or in Nazi Germany, than is the case in today's United States? One should not simply assume that it was, or that it wasn't, but instead recognize how extremely far from being a democracy today's United States has, in fact, become. This is the most shocking realization of all, because it's the most suppressed news of all -- news about the news-suppression by the 'news'-media.
Regarding that charge of news-suppression in America: among the 'news' media to which these news-reports have been regularly submitted and yet never published, have also been specialized ones, such as fair.org, mediamatters.org, and Foreign Policy magazine; and yet even they refuse to report these realities about U.S. foreign policy and its cover-ups, and about the controlled U.S. 'news' media -- in neither specialized field (neither press-reviews, nor international policy) is it being reported. And, of course, it's not broadcast in any U.S. national media. That's how dire the condition of what used to be American democracy has now become.
The biggest news-story of all is thus the one that is, and that will inevitably be, the most suppressed news-story of all: the news-suppression itself. It extends from the major 'news'-media to the alternative and even to the specialized 'news'-media.
Edward Snowden, the former CIA and NSA employee and then contractor who went public about the U.S. Government's violating the 4th Amendment and other U.S. Constitutional provisions regarding Americans' right to privacy and so forth, addressed on October 20th, a class at Harvard Law School, and he spoke about the impossibility of democracy to exist if there is not informed consent from the public of what the Government is doing, and of what the authentic aims of the Government are in what it is doing and intends to do. He necessarily had to speak from an undisclosed location, because the U.S. Government wants to imprison him (if not worse). He raised the extremely serious question as to whether, and the extent to which, a government can lie to its public and still be a democracy.
That's the question. How can the public have a government representing informed consent, if the 'news' media are constantly, and systematically, lying about the most important things, and covering up that government's worst, most heinous, crimes? Yet, this is what Americans have today.
The United States is thus no longer a model for any country except for a dictatorship. How likely is it that America's press will let the American public know this now-established fact?
Something's wrong -- and it's not people such as Edward Snowden.
For yet another of the many examples of U.S. news-suppression, click here. This interview, 13 years after the news-event, was relegated to C-Span, not aired on ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, or cable-news channels.