If this has been our policy, at what point can these nations who share our Western Hemisphere look forward to mutual benefit? If the U.S. desires a friendly neighborhood, then it must begin by being a good neighbor. No one likes a bully, and if our policies have tended to compromise the integrity of our neighbors to the south, then we need to begin fresh dialogues that consider the needs of our partners, and not just our own. Let us renew those relationships which show the most promise, and welcome suggestions for how to develop and strengthen our other partnerships.
No one expects the unification of the Americas to happen anytime soon, but we can promote the development of inclusive dialogue by suggesting ways in which we can mutually benefit from our relationships. Why should other global regional-partnerships achieve such remarkable success in their trade relations, while the Western Hemisphere struggles to survive? Do our European and Far-Eastern neighbors have goods and services to offer that we in the West do not? We are being outmaneuvered in our own backyard! If we refuse to develop our own neighborhood, we encourage other nations to do it for us, on THEIR terms.
The United Nations was established in the West because the world relied on us for leadership at a time when former global templates had dissolved. It’s time that we begin to unite with our world partners instead of persisting with our go-it-alone mentality. The urgency of responding to the events of 9-11 created a perception in the eyes of some that our world partners could no longer be relied upon for guidance and support.
Perhaps we should revisit that perception long enough to recall that these same partnerships have endured the test of time for many generations. In addition, we in the West have formed other strategic relationships in the Far East that require patient nurturing so that the seeds of global cooperation can mature. The Americans, like any other global-partnership, can only be as strong as their weakest link.
Some would argue that our creative manipulation of the Monroe Doctrine has resulted in damaged relationships that are too broken to mend. There is no time like the present to discover the cracks that need mending and resolve to perform the needed repairs. Some of our southern neighbors are in need of a great deal more than charity can provide if they are to be brought into the 21st century. Should we watch silently while others make the necessary investments in infrastructure with our American neighbors, and be content only to make commentaries on the latest political and economic developments south-of-the border, or should we proactively seek to be instrumental in guiding and shaping this development?
This marathon of diplomatic effort in the Americas is in need of a fresh infusion of hope and determination from both the public and private sectors in order to respond effectively to all of the educational and developmental requirements. Rather than developing the Americas from afar, our policies must include a blueprint of inclusiveness that establishes southern leadership positions where they are able to influence and determine paths-of-development for their future.
This strategy will come as welcome news to those who struggle to overcome the perception of non-inclusiveness in the present diplomatic formula. When we approach our neighbors with a developmental plan that includes them in the decision-making process as real partners who enable their own transformation, we enlist their cooperation to realize its actualization. When we perceive that our relations with some partners have been damaged either by our own policy errors, or as a result of misperceptions caused by forces within or without their own borders, our response must persuade using the most attractive and inclusive strategies which we are able to provide. When our southern neighbors realize that we, as Americans working together, can truly accomplish changes that will empower and uplift our Western Hemisphere, they will be less likely to engage in primary relations with another hemisphere.
The best guarantee for our reluctant partners that diplomacy with us will yield results, is the success of our neighboring partnerships. We will experience other global economic challenges in the future which require strategic partnerships similar to that of the European Union. Let’s not be caught unprepared for the next crisis, but instead prepare our hemisphere for the requirements needed to prosper in the new millennium. Our inevitable struggles equip us for the eventual challenges we face in the global community.
Our union strengthens our leverage and impact with other world communities. Does the West still possess the formula and the ingredients for success? Can we motivate others in our own hemisphere and those of like-minds throughout the world, that our methods are correct, practical and transformational? Is it true that following the model we provide will help our global partners to succeed? We have led by example in the 20th century, and I believe that we can inspire the Western Hemisphere and the world to respond to our example and follow us into this new millennium.
In order to accomplish this, we must first trust each other enough to cooperate in the relationships that will transform the West. As a cohesive unit, we can present a united and compelling hemisphere to our global neighbors. Good governance must supply the blueprint and the leadership necessary for success. We have the manpower, energy and diplomatic willingness to accomplish the unification of our Western Hemisphere. Let’s not let policy failures and short-sightedness deter us from accomplishing the union that we seek.
Mark Overt Skilbred