Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Reply to Congressman Kinzinger

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 509442
Message Em Sos
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger recently writes in The Washington Examiner: The North Korean threat is real, but the (our) hysteria is unnecessary

"Today, right now, North Korea is the number-one threat facing the United States and our allies in the Pacific. While Russia continues to be a threat to our democracy and our security, the nuclear proliferation and escalated accuracy of the threats coming from the unhinged Kim regime have pushed this to the very top of our national security concerns."

What are the determinants for an assessment of Korea as an "unhinged Kim regime"? Or, is it simply okay to disparage any 'other' as we see fit?

If the foregoing first two sentences alone, are not the height of being hysterically unhinged, then what is? He is comparing the actual global nuclear proliferation potential that emanates from within the US, at all times - this possible apocalyptic nuclear annihilation threat to the entire planet, to a state fully within its international sovereign right to stand up to this behemoth in potential nuclear destructive capacity. The only hysterical in this ad-hominem type of argument is the sick humor contained in its details.

Why not leave 'our allies' in the Pacific altogether out of the equation, none of whom have any nuclear deterrence against US hegemony. They are allies, only in that they do kowtow to US dictates. Those nations wanting to steer their own independent course, such as the Philippines, for example, become questionable -- teetering on being regarded as unhinged by the hegemon.

So long as the dictator and fascist Marcos reigned, he was 'our' man and 'we' did not interfere. He was carte-blanche, permitted to get away with any atrocity; not so for Duterte, the elected President. He is not a 'yes' man. But they can't defend themselves; therefore, the US once again interferes. According to the tenets of US 'diplomacy' this is unilaterally permissible, given the Philippines are not even close to "the number-one" threat.

Why does this comment of the Congressman, in his Op Ed piece, about an "unhinged Kim regime" made in The Washington Examiner, not apply equally and reciprocally, to the US, as it is implied of North Korea's Kim?: "The threat from (the US) is very real... To underestimate our enemies is foolish, (but to not have our own comparable nuclear deterrent military strength and capability) is detrimental and will cause long-term damage."

At this precarious moment in history is it not more unhinged making a not empty threat that "we are locked and loaded"?

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Em Sos Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Free thinking, animate, global subject, as competent as the next humane being, to dialogue on the matter of our species continued survival on mother Earth.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Which United States Are We Talking About?

The Greatest Lies Ever Told

Mike Whitney's Tom Friedman Paean to a Saudi Tyrant

If Only They Will See: First-Hand Factual Histories' Observations Are Ample Enough Reference.

For 400 Years, Talking and Talking... and Talking

Supremacist Mindset is As Old As White Settlement of the United States Itself