Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
General News      

Prop 33 is Misrepresented in Your California Voter Guide


William Kelleher

My Fellow California Voters!

As you may know, Prop 33 gives the People and their local governments the power to enact Rent and Eviction regulations for their own jurisdiction. That is currently prevented by a law called Costa-Hawkins.

The information about Prop 33 in your Voter Guide is written by somebody called the "Legislative Analyst". No name is given. So I don't know who wrote this. However, State law requires that this Analyst provide an estimate of the measure's impact on state and local government revenues and costs.

Unfortunately, the information provided is very prejudiced against Prop 33. It presents a very negative view.

For example, the Voter Guide, pages 42-43, speculates as to the cost Prop 33 would have for the state government, but says nothing about what benefits it would have for the local governments.

The Voter Guide says that Prop 33 "would reduce property tax revenues [by] at least tens of millions of dollars." (p43)

Well, that's not good news. The state needs all the revenue it can get!

But, what's worse, the Voter Guide says that "About half" of that money "would have gone to schools."

In other words, a "yes" vote on Prop 33 will take money away from little school children, just to save a few bucks for renters.

After hearing that, how ya gonna vote?

But wait! If you consider the benefits Prop 33 will have for your local economies, it seems clear that Prop 33 would bring in More Money for school children.

Think about it.

Wherever rents are stabilized at an affordable rate in this state, tenants will have more money to spend.

Much of this will be spent in local businesses. For instance, parents buying school supplies for their children. Renters would also have more money for groceries, clothing, books, vacations, perhaps an EV; thus, benefiting the environment.

Renters would also have money to pay for those prescriptions they have been denying themselves so that they could pay the rent. This means the state of California will receive an increase of sales taxes. That would be at least millions of dollars each year.

Also, profits for local businesses will go up. So, store owners will pay more income tax to the state. That would be millions of dollars more for the state, and for schools!

In other words, if Prop 33 passes, local area economies will prosper from stabilizing rents in the community, and state revenues would NOT be hurt.

Please consider these Benefits of Prop 33 for local communities when voting.

William J. Kelleher, PhD

Rate It | View Ratings

William Kelleher Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Affordable Housing Advocate Political Scientist Author

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Prop 33 is Misrepresented in Your California Voter Guide

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend