It will be interesting to see how the idiotic sycophantic governments of the U.S. and Canada apologize for these acts of terror on civilians on a humanitarian mission.
Netanyahu in Canada - the New Republican stronghold
Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper was elected to a minority government in 2006. Since then he has done his best to set up what could be considered a Republican government for the state of Canada. Except that Canada is not a state of the United States (just a weak willed wimpy ally) nor are there any Republican parties in Canada. Stephen Harper however is as close as it gets.
Signs of the times
One of the signs is the economy. The current conservative government has applauded itself many times for the stability of the Canadian banking system in face of the world economic decline. Fortunately for Canada, Harper has only had a minority government, otherwise deregulation as per the U.S. style of handling its finances could have been introduced well before the bubble burst. Canada only looks good because the conservatives did not have the power to implement its U.S. model of finance liberalization.
Harper followed the U.S. lead in giving out large sums of money for infrastructure projects, many of which had already been announced ahead of the budget, many of which had already been finished (if the many road signs bragging about moving Canada forward by building infrastructure are any indication), and most of the money made its way into corporate pockets rather than the pockets of the average consumer. I would hazard to surmise that the deficit thus created serves the same purpose as that in the U.S. and Greece: to help limit or eliminate government pension funds and funding of health and welfare structures. We will be told that with the current huge deficit that we should all tighten our belts and the government must do the same, yet the poor corporations receive nothing but government largesse following the same track as our U.S. neighbours.
Harper has two degrees in economics, a sign in my mind for certain that he does not know what he is talking about, as economists generally are versed only in idealistic theories within falsely created models and falsely contrived mathematics of market perfection.
Another sign is the environment. Harper and his colleagues have been extremely weak on environmental issues, preferring not to use the principle of scientific uncertainty, but the deniers principle of no action without absolute proof. Even with the current BP disaster unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico, the Harper government has recently put forward a law that allows corporations drilling in the Arctic to not have to drill a secondary "rescue' well in case of an accident as was in the books up until now. Imagine an oil spill as deep as the Gulf of Mexico but under winter pack ice and howling blizzards".
The real right turn"Israel
All that I can live with as the finance system will follow its own irrational convolutions and unexpected turns and twist whether Canadian banks are more or less highly regulated. I can also live with the environmental disaster of a massive oil leak in the Arctic as mother nature will soon straighten us all out on that account.
What I cannot abide by is the Harper government's unequivocal support given to Israel and its occupation of Palestine, its denial of the democratic election of Hamas, its support of the 2006 invasion of Lebanon, and its support of Israeli war crimes in Gaza and its subsequent dismissal of the Goldstone report. The Palestinian voice is being eliminated in Canada as the government and media pay fawning attention to Mr. Netanyahu's current visit in order to "reaffirm our countries' strong relationship." [1]
Harper denied funding support to the Palestinians after the most democratic elections that have ever been held in the Middle East in recent times, decrying them as terrorists' who do not deserve our support. He denies or ignores how the "terrorists' in South Africa and Ireland were incorporated into the peaceful functioning of government, and how the Afghani government is wisely asking to contact and incorporate the Taliban in talks, along with the U.S. In Lebanon, Hezbollah has demonstrated a clear pragmatic trend as it has successfully entered the public arena as a political power.
To accept that the military actions in Lebanon and Gaza are defensive retaliations is to live in a world of denial as to the reality of Israeli military goals that are part and parcel of the whole historical Israeli/Zionist ideal of ethnically cleansing Palestine of its indigenous population. Harper's fundamentalist religious background, although never exposed to the Canadian public, are well in line with similar views in the U.S. of the imminent return of Jesus and the coming apocalypse, views that tie in well with supporting the Israeli control of Palestine. [2]
Here we go again - Netanyahu in Canada.
Netanyahu visited Canada in 2002, just as the U.S. was priming the pump for the illegal invasion of Iraq under many false pretences. Now the U.S. is priming the pump for another illegal attack this time on Iran - after many years of illegal threats of attack - because of its refusal to do as the U.S. wishes in relation to its nuclear industry and because Israel needs an enemy to focus the world's attention on in order to keep alive the myth of a people suffering under the threat of elimination by the surrounding Arabs and Muslim terrorists.
Within that there is no recognition of Israel's overwhelming military power and its several hundred atomic/thermonuclear weapons that could incinerate most of the Middle East. Nor is there recognition that Iran is working within the intent of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty (NPT), unlike the U.S. itself which has only paid lip service to reducing its nuclear armaments, and has helped India and Pakistan create and augment there systems, both outside the NPT. Nor is there recognition that the U.S. has given billions of dollars and military weaponry to the Israelis over its entire existence, partly in short-sighted support of the Jewish vote in key areas of the U.S. electoral ridings, but also in its hegemonic quest to contain Russia, China, and the energy resources of the Middle East.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
