Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 15 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Nader and Romanelli Victims of Pennsylvania Democrats' Conspiracy

Message John Murphy

Nader and Romanelli Victims of Pennsylvania Democrats' Conspiracy Something's Rotten in the State of Pennsylvania

"The deterioration of every government begins with the decay of the principles on which it was founded." C.L. baron de Montesquieu
For the last few weeks in one Pennsylvania newspaper after another the story which is being called "Bonusgate" has been unfolding. By July 9 over a dozen employees of the Pennsylvania House Democratic Caucus along with two former Lancaster County Democrat leaders have been indicted. The Pennsylvania Attorney General's office announced the charges were the first phase of an investigation into allegations that state employees used public time and equipment and got taxpayer-funded bonuses for political work.

Some of that work involved the use of state employees to challenge the nominating petitions of Ralph Nader in 2004 (See my article "Political Profiling in Pennsylvania ( and Carl Romanelli 2006. The state employees used by the Democrats to remove Romanelli were particularly pernicious (see my article "The Price of Free Speech" (

Democrats went to such lengths to have me arrested for disorderly conduct just in order to eliminate another one of Romanelli's defenders.

The grand jury report described a "massive" effort by House Democrats to oust the independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader from the ballot in 2004. The report also says that in 2006 the same machine was fired up again to remove Carl Romanelli, the Green Party candidate for U.S. Senate.

The Democrats' Culture of Corruption

The grand jury found that as many as 50 Democrat House Caucus staff members participated in the Nader petition challenge and contributed a staggering number of man-hours. One House Democrat employee testified before the grand jury that "everybody was working on this". It was virtually a caucus wide endeavor and many of the employees spent an entire week on the Nader petition challenge. None of the supervisors of this "veritable army of caucus staffers" ever asked the workers to take unpaid leave and the bulk of the research was done in the Capitol complex and in the district office of former House Democratic Whip Mike Veon.

The grand jury found that House Democrats paid $1.2 million in bonuses for campaign related activities from 2004 to 2006. This was only a single facet of the concentrated effort to employ taxpayer funds and resources for campaign purposes.

Upon the successful challenge to the Nader petition Democrat Whip Mike Veon sent an e-mail to his staff stating: "FYI. Great job by our staff! This would have never been successful without your work. You have given John Kerry an even better opportunity to win the state. One of the five most important states to win this year[sic]. This is a very significant fact and significant contribution by each one of you to the Kerry for President campaign. You should take great pride in your efforts."

The Romanelli petition challenge was led by Brett Cott, a former analyst on Veon's Capitol staff who announced it was very important to "leadership" that Romanelli not appear on the ballot. Staffers were told not to worry about leave but to focus on getting the petition challenges done as soon as possible.

To make matters worse both Ralph Nader and Carl Romanelli were ordered by the courts to pay the Democrat Party's legal expenses! One of the largest law firms in the world, Reed Smith was used by the Democrat Party in its effort to remove Ralph Nader. Nader was ordered to pay $81,000 in legal fees. Ironically the law firm of Reed Smith contributed somewhere in the neighborhood of $37,000 to the election campaigns of the judges who ruled against Ralph Nader and in favor of Reed Smith!

As I said in my 2005 article, "There are two ways to defeat democracy, one way is by preventing citizens from voting, and the other is by preventing worthy candidates from appearing on the ballot. When the law can be used as a subterranean tool in a process which can only be labeled 'political profiling' the meaning and the intent of the law is subverted as is the democracy from which those laws were supposed to have sprung".

That ain't no way to treat a lady

The Pennsylvania Democrats do not limit their efforts at destroying the democratic process by only attacking Presidential or Senatorial candidates. Only one week ago a member of my own campaign staff who was collecting signatures for my ballot access effort in Lancaster Pennsylvania was harassed by a Democrat Party operative in plain sight of the Democrat Party candidate for Congress. My campaign worker told me that the Democrat staffer said to her, in a menacing voice, that he would go over her petitions with a magnifying glass and check that there were no duplicate signatures on any of my petitions.

Having an operative of the Democrat Party menace a woman helping an independent candidate achieve ballot access indicates the level of depravity to which the Democrat Party and its operatives have sunk.

With any luck the grand jury will discover that the removal of Romanelli and Nader constitutes nothing less than a criminal conspiracy with the overt purpose of destroying democracy in Pennsylvania. The judgments against Nader and Romanelli should be abandoned and Democrat Party leaders in Pennsylvania should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for this heinous act.

John Murphy is the 2008 independent candidate for House of Representatives in the 16th Congressional District of Pennsylvania ( In his 2006 campaign he was endorsed by Michael Berg, Peter Camejo, Noam Chomsky, Ralph Nader and Howard Zinn. He is one of the founding members of the Pennsylvanian Ballot Access Coalition , working to change the egregious ballot access laws in Pennsylvania which allowed the Democrat Party to knock Ralph Nader off the ballot in 2004 and Green Party Gubernatorial Candidate Carl Romanelli in 2006. He can be reached at:

Rate It | View Ratings

John Murphy Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I am the independent candidate for House of Representatives and a 16th Congressional District of Pennsylvania.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama and the Hitler Youth Revisited


Nader and Romanelli Victims of Pennsylvania Democrats' Conspiracy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend