There is no doubt that the thirty-minute video 'Kony 2012' by the advocacy group Invisible Children has raised much awareness regarding the relatively under-reported atrocities committed by the Ugandan rebel group the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA). It is also true that the video, which boasts of over 80 million views on YouTube so far, has been subjected to much - I think fair -- scrutiny. Criticism of the motives, accuracy and objectivity of the video's makers has stirred a rather healthy debate on the issue, where alternative ways forward were discussed.
image from the Kony youtube video
However, I could not help but wonder how Invisible Children -- whose founders are reported to have evangelical leanings - would have fashioned their video had the LRA been a Muslim extremist group (instead of being a Christian one, whose former name was the 'Uganda Christian Democratic Army'). I am not suggesting here that the group's professed beliefs are behind their abduction and enslavement of more than 30,000 children over the period of 25 years, where some of the boys become child soldiers, forced or brainwashed into murdering their own parents, and many of the girls end up as sex slaves after being captured. The LRA fighters would chop off the arms, legs or ears of their victims. Sometimes they would padlock their lips. As a result of their terrorising violence, hundreds of thousands of people have been displaced. The group does -- bizarrely -- claim to be fighting for the establishment of the rule of the Ten Commandments in a theocratic Uganda (although they have been active in three other African countries: South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Central African Republic).
But in the video, you hear the claim that the LRA leader is "not fighting for any cause but only to maintain power" (without any mention of the group's own proclaimed reasons). That may very well be true of many fanatics but how many of those would have their religious views subjected to censorship (maybe to avoid confusing their extreme interpretation with that of the mainstream understanding of a religion)? Not many Muslim ones, I would argue. Even the full name of the group -- the Lord's Resistance Army -- was not even pronounced once (although it did appear in writing) during the whole video. Instead you only hear the LRA acronym. Perhaps the video makers did not wish to 'take the Lord's name in vain'.
According Vincent Otti, the now deceased second in command of the group, the LRA is "fighting in the name of God. God is the one helping us in the bush. That's why we created this name, Lord's Resistance Army. And people always ask us, are we fighting for the [biblical] Ten Commandments of God. That is true -- because the Ten Commandments of God is the constitution that God has given to the people of the world. All people. If you go to the constitution, nobody will accept people who steal, nobody could accept to go and take somebody's wife, nobody could accept to innocently kill, or whatever. The Ten Commandments carries all this."
The above quote suggests that the enemies of the LRA are not "innocent" and therefore killing them is justified. And Joseph Kony, a former Catholic preacher, is himself reported to use biblical references -- mainly passages from the Pentateuch - to justify mutilation and murder. Elaborating on that logic, one of Kony's most trusted commanders, named Moses, was quoted as saying: "If someone has done something bad to you, you have to kill them! Go and read in Matthew, chapter what and what, it is stated that if your right hand causes trouble, cut if off! It is there in the Bible!"
Kony is reported to have named one of his sons 'George Bush', and although the former US president certainly does not condone the LRA (which is more than can be said for the American Christian conservative Rush Limbaugh who had defended the group in a radio gaff), both men -- Kony and Bush - claim to receive direct messages from God.
In addition to the overtly religious rhetoric of LRA leaders, testimonies from boys who have escaped from the grip of the terror group point to religious symbolism, where the child soldiers would make cross signs on their chests, foreheads, shoulders and guns, using special oil that is said to have the power of the Holy Spirit. And they were told that those who die -- from all sides -- must have broken religious commands.
Of course the LRA's mystic brand of Christianity is different
from the mainstream understanding of the faith (although that too had long been
abused to promote terror). And the reality is that the conflict has never really
been of a religious nature. It is much more complicated than that. But that's
true of many violent groups who use religious rhetoric to make political
points. These groups, like the LRA, can be found making strange bedfellows -- sometimes
forging unexpected alliances and fighting unlikely enemies. However, if any
group professed to have committed some of the aforementioned atrocities in the
name of Islam -- regardless of how far such actions are from the mainstream of
the religion -- it is quite common that the faith (and by extension everyone who
believes in it) would take the blame. It would not be about one man -- or his
army -- gone mad or is on a quest for power, as the video suggests.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).