I have farmed with pesticides, chemical fertilizers and livestock hormones, and was lucky enough to jump off that ship before it went completely under the waves. I experienced the shortcomings and failures of pesticides, antibiotics and the system in general. I was concerned for the health of my family, my livestock and the soil, so I got out.
I dropped out of the conventional farming system (seeing organic production as a better, safer and more productive alternative) just as the revolution of genetic modification (GM) and its "promise" to feed the world was being forced upon the world.
When I say forced, I mean just that.
Despite clear indications of health risks, our government maintains that food with GM content is substantially equivalent to non-GM, therefore labeling is not required.
When GM crops resistant to the weed killer Roundup were introduced, farmers were promised that one application of the herbicide was all they would ever need. Dream on, I watch spray rigs running across neighboring fields from April to November, Roundup is no longer doing the job--- the promise of less chemical application was a false promise.
Our current food system, dominated by intensive farming practices (notably GM crops), is a system that is failing in so many ways.
It is a system that has destroyed rural economies worldwide.
A system that contributes to an epidemic of obesity, diabetes, food allergies, heart disease and cancer for some, while at the same time allowing hunger to persist for others.
A system that that is controlled by multi-national corporations whose interest is profit, not healthy food, not land stewardship, and certainly not fair prices for farmers.
Peter Rosset tells us, food is different. "It is not a typical commodity because it affects so many people and the environment in such intimate ways".
Food production and food choice should be controlled by farmers and those who eat, not corporations, and not politicians.
While some feel that the cheapest food is the best food, people are not stupid, they want to be able to make choices about the food they buy. This is why California Proposition 37 is such a critical ballot initiative. It's so simple, food with GM content should be labeled as such so people can make a choice.
If GM is so safe, so necessary, so full of promise, why are corporate interests so opposed to labeling it?
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).