Why I want to commence a new majority rule based on economic freedom? A new economic democracy is really need to the world to defeat extreme poverty, discrimination and disease. Before I enter on my article I desire to argue like, here's an Adam Smith quote. Smith said "civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor." Smith would have railed against giant corporations if he were alive today.
Hence, I am arguing in this article how to define economic capitalism. How do I define socialist economy? What would be my approach to conserve the universe? My focal point is an important aspect of the economic system. Because the trouble I have today is that the "Economy And Capitalism" of the economic and social system. Where I formerly knew as much about communism, Socialism as I know about capitalism. Today it is gruelling for me to instantly find anyone who has even read Lenin, much less a devastating review of him such as one finds in Solzhenitsyn. My article is focusing on capitalism also in the same direction. I am picking out here that the critique is a riddle making use of Churchill's famous statement about capitalism is the worst possible system except for all the others. In reality, there are two extremes. Total control of economic matters or totally "hands off" of economic matters.
In reality, every system is a compromise. I can argue there are limits which are moved past in large danger. I want to tell you in point of historical fact.
What I also see is that "capitalism" is an economic system. So much as an acknowledgement of a central reality: it is the accumulation of "capital" which allows investment but failed to ending poverty.
That such efforts usually go wrong is simple. That is, it tries very hard to tell people to "be free" in certain areas. Today I desire to argue why my economic politics would be a different then present economic model?.
1
1
1
Post Article Comment and Rate This Article
