Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 4/7/17

How The Media Paved the Way for Trump's Attack on Syria

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   3 comments
Author 54958
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Pete Tucker
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)


(Image by commondreams.org)   Details   DMCA
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad may be responsible for the recent and gruesome chemical attack in his country. That may be what a thorough investigation concludes.

Until then, asking the tough questions seems wise, even as cruise missiles have already fallen on Syria.

But reporters, even prior to Thursday's U.S. missile attack on Syria, weren't entertaining such questions. That was visible in a contentious exchange Wednesday between CNN host Kate Bolduan and Rep. Thomas Massie, who questioned what Assad's motive for launching the chemical attack would be.

The Washington Post quickly followed up CNN's interview with a story portraying the Kentucky Republican's position as less than credible ("Massie could be increasingly a party of one on this issue").

Amidst the Post story's unflattering framing, Massie's quotes stand out.

"Let me ask you this: Who benefits? Who benefits, if chemical weapons were used and America weighs in on the side of the rebels, or wades into a war against Assad?"

Robert Parry, an investigative reporter with ConsortiumNews, asked a similar question.

"Since Assad's forces have gained a decisive upper-hand over the rebels, why would he risk stirring up international outrage at this juncture? On the other hand, the desperate rebels might view the horrific scenes from the chemical-weapons deployment as a last-minute game-changer."

Asking such questions doesn't mean "Assad's forces are innocent," writes Parry, "but a serious investigation ascertains the facts and then reaches a conclusion, not the other way around."

However the U.S. media was already off to the races, pushing an unpopular president towards an escalation of hostilities, that led to Thursday night's bombing of Syria.

'We should stay the hell out of Syria'

Previously Trump indicated he wouldn't push for Assad's ouster, but instead would work with the Syrian government's biggest backer, Russia, to fight the Islamic State.

Back in 2013, after a prior chemical attack near Damascus, it was Trump, via Twitter, who counseled President Obama not to go after Assad.

"We should stay the hell out of Syria, the 'rebels' are just as bad as the current regime," tweeted Trump.

Now it's Trump, with the media's encouragement, who has launched a military attack on Assad.

It's worth recalling that in regards to the 2013 chemical attack, in addition to Obama, The New York Times said it had proved Assad was responsible, only to later issue a quiet correction of sorts, which few noticed, Parry reported.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pete Tucker Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pete Tucker is an independent DC reporter.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How The Washington Post Covers for a Top D.C. Official

A Must-Read in Trying Times: Chomsky's 'Requiem for the American Dream'

How Change Happens: 18 Acts of Resistance

Backed by $10 million in 'Dark Money,' Gorsuch Claims He's Apolitical

Is RFK Jr. 'Anti-Vaccine'?

Is the FBI Out of Control?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: