Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Eminent Domain - a Gift Horse or Trojan Horse?

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   1 comment
Message David Petrovich

Do Public/Private Partnerships Bail Out Homeowners, or Compensate Criminals?

If a mortgage loan servicing representative were honest when speaking to an alleged borrower seeking mortgage loan assistance, he or she might say this:

"If   protecting my company's best financial self-interest helps you out, fine.   If it doesn't, that's fine, too. To us, you are a cash cow. You see, we get paid whether you make your payments or not. In fact, we get paid more when your loan is delinquent, in default or in foreclosure. If by foreclosing and kicking you out of your home our profit increases by a dollar more than if we allowed you to keep your home, you had better start thinking about packing.   But before we kick you to the curb, and in order for me to earn a quarterly bonus, you and your family are gonna ride an emotional and financial roller coaster to hell until I've squeezed every dollar from your pocket, and every dime in fees I can outta this. Then we'll foreclose. Even if my company has no legal right to do so."  

But such honesty would result in that employee's immediate termination. Under capitalism, profit-first corporations are duty-bound to preserve, protect and expand upon their own best financial self-interest.    

Based upon my own 30-plus years working in the foreclosure realm (the last 20 advocating for at-risk homeowners), it is my understanding, experience and belief that any so-called "relief" offered to financially distressed homeowners by their alleged lenders is overwhelmingly incidental to and irrespective of the greater benefit derived by the financial institution offering the relief.   

With increased public demand that foreclosing banks obey the laws, many foreclosure lawsuits are being withdrawn, or thrown out of court because Plaintiffs & Alleged Lenders have submitted (later discredited) manufactured documents shown to have been retroactively faked as proofs required by Section 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Or the litigants appear with no proof and are scolded, then walk away empty-handed with their tail between their legs. Unless and until homeowners challenge the validity of foreclosure actions, the banks' lawyers can bluff their way in court and win a judgment in foreclosure followed by the keys to the house. 

Recently, many communities have responded favorably to media-reported proposals from venture/vulture capitalists (including Mortgage Resolution Partners) who seek public/private partnerships promoted as a strategy to mitigate past, present and future damages (to all interested parties) arising from unrelenting mortgage foreclosures--legitimate or not. 

Don't get me wrong. I am all for using The People's power of Eminent Domain to seize toxic mortgage loans and other bank-owned real estate (OREO) and to have those properties banished to foreclosure limbo; and then to have an independent community non-profit authority implement strategies to preserve continued affordable home ownership for the members of the community. 

Some would argue that the "people's power" of eminent domain is in fact a police power. But police power and whom the police men and woman actually work for is content for another blog essay. 

But I AM NOT for using public funds to unjustly enrich the same gangster bankers who crashed the economy, stole your retirement funds and then bailed themselves out with your very own tax dollars. They lie, cheat, steal and offer courts of competent jurisdiction fraudulent documents as "proofs" that were used to justify the wrongful terrorizing of homeowners and then wrongly force them from their homes via 1) self-serving loan modifications, 2) coerced short sales, 3) accepting deeds in lieu of foreclosure, or 4) court- ordered physical evictions 

The proposals (hereafter The Plan) call for using the (public) police power of eminent domain and (private) equity financial capital to seize certain, qualified toxic mortgage loans for the dual purpose of 1) compensating the "alleged" owners of possibly worthless mortgage notes, and 2) restructuring loan repayments to be more affordable to the alleged borrowers. 

At first blush this idea sounds great, but could this be yet another backdoor bailout? Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? Wolf as predator. Or Sheep, as in We the Sheeple? 

But The Plan doesn't call for the seizure and payment for all toxic mortgage notes. No, only the notes whose payment would directly benefit the private equity capitalists' clientele, the private-label mortgage securities which do not carry a government (FNMA or FHLMC) guarantee. 

The morally bankrupt profit-before-people investment cartel and its lapdog US Congress, including the current sock puppet (fill in the blank) Occupant of the White House, got us into this mess. What makes any of us believe these same slick charlatans can fix it? We cannot hope to solve the problems we face today with the same level of thinking which created them.

Does The Plan fix the problem in such a way as to yield maximum widespread public benefit? Or is this yet another public bailout of the investment class disguised as a community benefit? 

Based upon the well documented predatory and illegal practices employed by these "too big to fail" Ponzi scammers, we must ask ourselves, "Is there a catch?" Because there is always a catch. What's the catch? What are we missing?   

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

David Petrovich Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Executive Director: Society For Preservation of Continued Homeownership (SPOCH), a 501c3 tax exempt, charitable and educational consumer advocacy.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wall Street's Achilles Heel may be hidden in plain sight

Foreclosure Crises Needs Private-Public Programs

Eminent Domain - a Gift Horse or Trojan Horse?

New Lamps for Old

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend