Tomorrow September 14 is Primary Day in New York State, and for the first time we will use ES&S Diebold Op Scan machines.
a whole host of reasons, the preparation for the switch-over was
woefully delayed and then rushed at the last minute - poll workers only
received training in the last three weeks.
like one of the biggest problems is going to be the ballot - which can
either be marked with a pen or with a ballot-marker device (intended for
disabled voters but available to anyone who wants to use it.
York State has a 'full-face ballot' requirement, a hold-over from the
lever machines, which stipulates that all candidates and all races need
to be on one page. This is intended to make the election fair, so that
no one, and no race, is relegated to a second page.
the lever machines, this was not a problem, as the machine only had one
large surface, so it always met this requirement. And few voters used
paper ballots, which were printed on very large sheets.
NY switched to the Op Scan machines, they kept the 'full-face ballot'
requirement for candidates. (Referendums are printed on the back of the
ballot - where they will probably be overlooked by most voters who won't
turn the ballot over.)
Especially for the
primaries, this now means that the ballot front is very crowded and the
type is very small. A lot of people are going to have trouble reading
through the ballot and aligning their votes with the right candidates in
the right columns, making sure not to overvote or undervote, especially
in the races where you are instructed to 'vote for any two' or 'vote
for any three', etc.
Some have already compared
the NY ballots to the infamous Florida 'butterfly' ballot design. The
media seems to be all over it - at the last minute. Where were they
last December when the decision on the machines was going down, and why
didn't they think about these issues then? Yet another massive media
fail . . .
So, election activists, stay tuned for tomorrow's results!
And here's info on a NY activist group's lawsuit -- in desperate need of a law firm to take the case.
primary election could mark the end of New Yorkers' ability to trust
our election results. ETC is still working to ensure that the cause of
democracy will not be abandoned. Deployment of the new electronic
vote-counting systems violates our constitutional rights as voters, and
the need to challenge these violations will remain until we reach
However, our lawsuit to stop electronic vote-counting in NY is in danger. Your help is urgently needed.
you know, Nassau County, building upon the thorough and copious work of
ETC over the past three years, has filed a case against the State
challenging electronic vote counting. Already Nassau has successfully
defeated the State's efforts to prevent the case from being aired in a
court of law. A federal judge has rejected the State Board of Elections'
attempt to move the case to federal court, and Nassau has won a ruling
in state court ordering its experts to be allowed to examine the optical
scan machines for their vulnerability to tampering, despite claims of
"proprietary" rights by the voting machine company.
Yet Nassau's case is missing a critical component that only a case by the voters can offer.There
are simply some causes of action which apply directly to voters that
the county does not have the ability to bring forward for the court's
consideration. Nassau acknowledges the vast amount of groundwork for
their case done by ETC and the need for the county's case to be
complemented and strengthened by a case filed on behalf of the voters.
In order for ETC to file our suit we urgently need your help in finding us a law firm that will stay the course with us.
writing today to fill you in on what's happened and where things stand,
and to ask for your immediate assistance in one of two ways:
lawsuit is ready to file. It has not yet been filed because our law
firm quit on us at the final moments! We have been scrambling to find
new legal representation, but have not yet succeeded.Without the necessary legal support, we cannot move forward.
- help us find a law firm willing to take on the case pro bono
- find us a major donor or small group of donors willing to pay a law firm (estimated cost: $100-200K)
Here are the details of recent events and our current situation:
the past four years, Election Transparency Coalition founder and
attorney Andi Novick has led ETC in preparing a suit challenging the use
of electronic vote counting with optical scanners on constitutional
grounds. The case is strong, and it's crucial to our democracy!
a long search, last fall we secured the pro bono (without charge)
services of a prestigious law firm. Using materials provided by ETC as
the basis for the case, they were to file by early December in order to
meet a critical December filing deadline. The firm repeatedly missed
agreed-upon deadlines and the work they performed was shoddy. We
expressed our concerns with how they'd gutted the case of its most
important points and with the continual delays. As the deadline
approached they used our objections as an excuse to drop the case at the
last minute. This behavior was extraordinary and highly unethical.
immediately reinstituted our search for a law firm, and were delighted
when we were approached by another prestigious firm that had heard about
our case from an article in the NY Times. We met with two of the firm's
partners and a small group of associates. They understood time was of
the essence and assured us they could file the litigation within a
month's time. But again we experienced delay after delay in the firm's
performing the work they'd promised. After agreeing on a final draft of
the summons and complaint and within 24 hours of a crucial and
agreed-upon filing date, they too withdrew from the case!
now we have witnessed our case delayed unnecessarily and then dropped at
the last minute. Both times we had provided a draft summons and
complaint complete with all the legal research to the firms, minimizing
the time and effort needed to commence the litigation, and yet both
firms dragged us along as we watched our efforts to get into court
thwarted. The reasons given for withdrawing were blatantly disingenuous.
So here we are. We have a very strong case that's ready to be filed and
MUST be filed. We have no law firm. And our own legal consultant, while
still with us, is prohibited for health reasons from leading the case.
has recently received a generous grant from the Threshold Foundation to
help provide for our staffing needs and other operating expenses. Yet
in order to move forward with our most important work suing the State
of NY to halt the changeover to electronic vote-counting legal
representation is URGENTLY needed.
We are turning now to you, our supporters.
think about attorneys you know who work at law firms that might be
willing to take on this high-profile impact case. Please either approach
them or reply to this email with their contact information and your
permission to use your name when we call them.
We ask you to
think, too, about people you know who care about the future of democracy
and might have the financial resources to fund the hiring of a law
firm. If there's someone you'd like to approach, we'd be happy to work
with you to assemble a packet of information to present with your
And to those of you who expressed your willingness to
become plaintiffs, this special note: We very much appreciate your
dedication. Should we find a law firm and be able to move forward with
our case, we will contact you as soon as our need for plaintiffs is
clear. Different attorneys have contrasting views about the number of
plaintiffs needed and whether or not we want a variety of counties
We thank you all for your ongoing support of ETC's
work. Without you, we could not have come this far. With you, we hope to
make it to the finish line: preserving NY's trustworthy and transparent
for theElection Transparency Coalition
P.S. Updates on Nassau's excellent work can be found at our website www.electiontransparencycoalition.org
2 Whether or not relevant to the constitutional issues we are
defending, ETC would be interested in hearing about your experiences at
the polls tomorrow. Send your accounts to Joanne@etcnys.org
are receiving this email because you signed up for occasional
communication from the Election Transparency Coalition. You may have
signed up back when our name was Re-Media ETC. We're the same group,
simply with a clearer name. We've replaced our informal email list with a
more formal one to bring you better quality communication in a more
appealing format.Unsubscribe email@example.com
from this list |Forward to a friend
|Update your profileOur mailing address is:
Election Transparency Coalition
P.O. Box 127Staatsburg
Diana Finch is a member of the New York City Community Church Election Task Force