Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts   

ClimateGate Controversy Updated

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
Author 46454
Message Ralph E. Stone
Last November, 1,000 stolen e-mails from one of the world's leading climate research centers in Britain seemed to challenge the scientific consensus that global warming is happening and that it is induced by human activity. The e-mails appeared to show researchers scolding skeptics of global warming, discussing ways to hide their data, and discussing ways to keep skeptics' research out of peer-reviewed publications. One e-mail authored by researcher Phil Jones seemed to suggest using a "trick" to "hide the decline" of temperatures.

The publication of the e-mails just before the Copenhagen climate-change summit last December created a furor, with skeptics of man-made climate change calling the e-mails "Climategate" and claiming them as proof that the science behind global warming had been exaggerated or even made up altogether.

On March 31st, the British House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee largely cleared the "ClimateGate" researchers involved, finding no evidence to support charges that the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit or its director, Phil Jones, had tampered with data or perverted the peer review process to exaggerate the threat of global warming. There is still an ongoing inquiry due out in this spring as to whether Jones manipulated the data.

"ClimateGate" had some effect on U.S. public opinion. A June 10, 2010 Stanford survey shows that 74 percent of Americans believe the world's temperature has been gradually rising over the past century, compared to 85 percent who believed it in 2006. Some Americans believe that, if there is global warming, it is cyclical and will either pass over time or the scientists will discover an eleventh-hour fix for the problem. ClimateGate and any public skepticism provides cover for our politicians to avoid the difficult task of addressing global warming.

Senator James Inhofe (R. Ok) and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R. Cal) probably represent the views of global warming skeptics. Senator Inhofe called "the threat of catastrophic global warming the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people." And Rep. Rohrabacher called the science behind global warming "emotional junk science." Even that eminent scientist Sarah Palin called global warming studies "snake oil science."

Regardless of the so-called ClimateGate controversy, it has long been known that humans impact our atmosphere severely and our unrelenting production of carbon dioxide (and other greenhouse gases) increase the effects of the naturally occurring "greenhouse effect" that keeps our planet habitable. The more CO2 we pump into our atmosphere, the warmer the atmosphere gets.This is a scientific fact based on decades of scientific study. The main cause of the increase in global average temperatures in recent history is not because of any natural cycle -- although natural cycles do exist -- it is because of man.

Denying global warming and its causes threatens all of humanity with slow, painful, untimely deaths. Scientists overwhelmingly agree that increasing global temperatures will cause sea levels to rise and will produce more intense weather and changes in precipitation patterns, changes in crop yields, glacier melting, extinction of species and the spread of disease. Putting our heads in the sand is not going to make global warming go away.

Global warming should be a non-partisan issue. It concerns us all whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal -- or anything in between.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Ralph E. Stone Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I was born in Massachusetts; graduated from Middlebury College and Suffolk Law School; served as an officer in the Vietnam war; retired from the Federal Trade Commission (consumer and antitrust law); travel extensively with my wife Judi; and since (more...)
 
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Burka: A Taliban Imposed Canvas Prison

Nordic Mysteries: The Millennium Trilogy

Time to Repeal the Health Insurance Industry's Antitrust Exemption

Cell Phone Health Hazards: Better Safe Than Sorry

Iraq War Hoax

Time for the U.S. to Cease Support of the Museveni Regime in Uganda