Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/1/19

Chelsea Manning Again Takes Fall for Defending Public's Right to Know

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   3 comments
Author 508946
Message Janine Jackson

From Common Dreams

- Advertisement -

I can't find any editorials in US corporate media in support of Manning, or of journalists' right to inform the public, or of the public's right to know

A judge ordered her incarcerated until she agrees to testify or until the jury is done, which might be 18 months.
A judge ordered her incarcerated until she agrees to testify or until the jury is done, which might be 18 months.
(Image by (Photo: Screenshot))
  Details   DMCA

Chelsea Manning was a US Army soldier who released to WikiLeaks Iraq and Afghan war logs, with information on torture and civilian killings, including an airstrike that killed two Reuters correspondents; and diplomatic cables revealing, among other things, a secret deal between the US and Yemen in which the US would bomb the country, and the Yemeni government would claim the attacks. For Manning, these were acts that shocked the conscience, and that US citizens, in whose names they were claimed, should know about. She hoped the release to the media and the public via WikiLeaks would spark "worldwide discussion, debates and reforms."

- Advertisement -

Image from the
Image from the 'Collateral Murder' video Chelsea Manning disclosed to WikiLeaks.
(Image by “Collateral Murder” video)
  Details   DMCA

The military sought a court martial and a life sentence, claiming her disclosure "aided the enemy"; she was eventually sentenced by a military judge to 35 years, but her sentence was commuted by Barack Obama after she had served seven years -- still the longest time anyone has served for disclosing classified information to the media. It's generally understood that Obama recognized that it wasn't possible to charge WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange, via Manning, without exposing journalists at the New York Times -- or the Washington Post to prosecution for sharing the same information -- not to mention collecting prizes for it.

- Advertisement -

Manning has recently been subpoenaed by a grand jury, widely understood to be attempting a case against Assange, though as a grand jury it's all very secretive, and asked to testify again about her 2010 public disclosures. She refused, citing the very secretiveness of the process, and noting that she had already testified fully about the reasons for her disclosures, that they were her choices alone, and not solicited by Assange or anyone else. A judge then ordered her incarcerated until she agrees to testify or until the jury is done, which might be 18 months.

But Manning isn't just in prison, she's in solitary confinement -- it's supposedly not punitive because she won't help the government make its case; no, it's "administrative segregation," generally understood to be for prisoners who might be in danger in the general prison population. US media talk about solitary confinement as though it were like a "time out" for the "worst of the worst"; it's defined by a UN special rapporteur and others as torture. The isolation of being confined to a cell for 22 hours a day, without access to other people or reading materials, is known to have harmful psychological impacts. Chelsea Resists! Manning's support committee, adds:

"It bears repeating that while solitary confinement should not be used for anyone, it is especially immoral to place Chelsea in solitary when she has not been accused of, charged with, nor convicted of any new crime."

Famed Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg says:

"It's a travesty that she has been sent back to jail for refusing to testify to a grand jury. An investigation into Wikileaks for publishing is a grave threat to all journalists' rights, and Chelsea is doing us all a service in fighting it."

So where is the press corps? A New York Times piece (3/8/19) by Charlie Savage noted that the effort to convict Julian Assange -- which is clearly what this is about -- would raise "novel and profound First Amendment issues." And outlets from the Times to CNN -- to Time magazine -- wrote single stories noting her re-incarceration.

- Advertisement -

But where are the editorials? Where is the outrage, or even recognition, that someone whose goal was to reveal actions -- illegal and unconscionable -- being carried out in the US people's name, and whose revelations led in fact to debate and interrogation of those actions, is once again taking the fall for reporters happy to report those revelations and claim awards for doing so? I can't find any editorials in US corporate media in support of Manning, or of journalists' right to inform the public, or of the public's right to know.

As with Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, decades from now, mainstream media will likely speak matter-of-factly about Manning's contributions as whistleblower. But what matters is what they're not doing now. Democracy dies in darkness, indeed.

Originally published by Fair

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Inspiring 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Janine Jackson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Janine Jackson is the program director of FAIR, and the co-host and co-producer of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin—a weekly program of media criticism airing on more than 150 stations around the country. Wikipedia

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

'Many More People Would Die if Republicans Are Successful'

Elite Media Need to Recognize Assaults on Reporters as a Pattern--and a Threat

Chelsea Manning Again Takes Fall for Defending Public's Right to Know

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


shad williams

Become a Fan
Author 63282

(Member since Apr 13, 2011), 22 fans, 51 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2387 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

The "national security" state comes for all of us. Perhaps it is time for us to come for it.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:11:34 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 2385 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I say to everyone who's got the time and desire, and looking to fire up a new website, here's a project for you...

1) Start a large global community to share in this and each prepare a website.

2) Have everyone in the community download every useful release from WikiLeaks and load them to their servers.

3) Launch these websites EN MASSE as leaks publishers, like WikiLeaks, and allow the files to be downloaded freely.

4) Watch the bedlam unfold.

Submitted on Tuesday, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:43:39 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

kappie

Become a Fan
Author 48333

(Member since May 6, 2010), 2 fans, 583 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

So much horse manure is labeled for security purposes.Most of national security is only to protect what the government is doing wrong and doesn't want the people to know.What is happening to manning is a national disgrace if you believe in freedom in the US

Submitted on Tuesday, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:40:20 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment