Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 17 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Businesses Add Costs to Social Programs and Complain About Taxes They Don't Pay

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   5 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert De Filippis
Become a Fan
  (30 fans)

From Garbage - Grey
Garbage - Grey by Byzantine_K

Recently, I've been reading about how some small businesses are figuring out ingenious ways to reduce employee hours or hire contractors to avoid the need to offer health insurance because of the Affordable Care Act.(Obamacare)

Remember, small businesses must offer healthcare insurance under certain conditions: "Employees with more than 30 hours of service per week or 130 hours of service per month must have access to employer-sponsored health care benefits at companies with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalents."

I gave a practical example of this kind of action in an earlier article "Due to low wages and few benefits, Walmart workers at a single 300-person Supercenter store rely on anywhere from $904,542 to $1,744,590 in public benefits per year, costing taxpayers, according to a new report from the Democratic staff of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce."

Although these kinds of business tactics are shortsighted and cost society a great deal of money, they don't surprise me. Business folks are smart and resourceful. They can be depended on to do what's necessary to maximize their profits. It's the first principle of business. Lately, it seems to be the only principle of business.

What surprises me is how the taxpayers are so oblivious to the efforts of the business community to   privatize their profits and share the costs of their profit-protecting tactics with the public.

But there is a little bit of good news. I read of a New York sushi restaurant that eliminated tipping the wait staff by paying a living wage and some benefits. And by doing so has probably saved the taxpayers money in government provided benefits that go to the working poor.

Most people don't know that a New York restaurant can pay as little as $2.25 per hour on the assumption that the wait staff will make up the difference between that amount and the minimum wage in tips. Sometimes they do and sometime they don't.

Even at the minimum wage, most serving-staff in restaurants are considered the working poor and depend on government benefits to survive. And they're not alone.

From the Wall Street Journal article titled, "Who Makes Up the "Working Poor' in America? by Sudeep Reddy

"Roughly 46 million people in the U.S., or 15% of the population, lived below the official poverty line in 2011 ($11,484 for an individual or $23,021 for a family of four per year). About 10.4 million of them are considered part of the "working poor." That means they spent at least half the year in the labor force (working or looking for work), but they still fell below the poverty level.

Part-time work is only half the problem. About 4.4 million people who usually worked in full-time jobs were classified as working poor in 2011. That's about 4% of all full-time workers. About 14% of part-time workers were classified as working poor.

The service sector accounted for 3.3 million of the working poor in 2011. About 13% of all service workers were classified as working poor. About 17% of workers in farming, fishing and forestry jobs were part of the working poor. And about 10.6% of workers in construction and extraction roles were working poor."

I understand Republican's continual efforts to defund government social programs. It's their thing you know, small government, except the military. But the cheese gets a bit more binding when they keep working to reduce the tax load on businesses and ignore the fact that some of these businesses are off-loading costs onto the taxpaying public.

Employees are human beings. Human beings need health care, housing, nutrition, clothing, etc. In a capitalistic society, those needs require money. Who's going to pay? Either business pays a living wage or government provides a safety net and we, the taxpayers, pay for it.

Which way do we want it? Higher prices and living wages or higher taxes and government social programs to make up the difference. Or we can act like the working poor don't exist. Good luck with that!

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Robert De Filippis Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Author, columnist, and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I've authored and published eight books: "You, Your Self and the 21st Century,"The Flowers Are Talking to Me," and "Faith (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend