Send a Tweet
- Advertisement -
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Brighter US-Iran Prospects

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
Author 513369
Message Patrick Lawrence

From Consortium News

Still from video released by Iran's Revolutionary Guards showing helicoptered troops taking over a British tanker.
Still from video released by Iran's Revolutionary Guards showing helicoptered troops taking over a British tanker.
(Image by (YouTube))
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

There was no shortage of alarming incidents in and around the Persian Gulf last week. But the risks of open conflict between Iran and the U.S. are easily misread. The prospects for substantive diplomacy between the two sides are steadily brightening, recent events notwithstanding. This represents an advance for President Donald Trump in his intramural battles with the assertive hawks among his foreign policy advisers. Still more significantly, Washington now appears to be discovering the limits of hard power in the 21st Century.

Trump announced last Thursday that a U.S. naval vessel patrolling the Persian Gulf had downed an Iranian drone over international waters, a claim Tehran has rebutted with persuasive evidence. On Friday the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's navy briefly detained one British-owned tanker and continues to hold another while investigating alleged infractions of lawful conduct at sea, this in apparent retaliation for Britain's earlier seizure of an Iranian tanker off Gibraltar.

It was a week of escalating tensions, as numerous press reports noted. Top British military officers warned Boris Johnson, who is likely to succeed Theresa May as prime minister on Tuesday, that he faces "a major international crisis" that could easily tip over into war.

- Advertisement -

There is always the possibility that a miscalculation on the ground or a commanding officer's bout of bravado could spark a military confrontation. But setting this aside, the week delivered strong new indications that Trump and the leadership in Tehran are both now given to negotiating differences. In the best of outcomes, any such talks will be extended and all-encompassing.

Iran Sends Diplomatic Signals

Hassan Rouhani and Mohammad Javad Zarif, respectively Iran's president and foreign minister, both signaled last week that Tehran is open to new talks under certain conditions. On the U.S. side, Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo did roughly the same. "We are not looking for regime change. We are not looking for that at all," Trump said Tuesday. "We'll see what happens. But a lot of progress has been made."

- Advertisement -

Two days after those remarks, Politicoreported that Trump had accepted Sen. Rand Paul's proposal, advanced during a round of golf the previous weekend, to represent the White House in talks with Iranian officials. The Kentucky senator is noted for his vigorous opposition to military adventures a position in keeping with the president's ostensible views. It is not clear who Paul might meet, or where and when any such encounter could take place. But Trump's decision to accept Paul as his emissary is a savvy move to circumvent the hawks among his foreign policy advisers, chief among them National Security Adviser John Bolton, who has in the past called for regime change in Iran.

Bolton, often (but not always) with Pompeo's support, has pressed for a highly confrontational Iran policy since he joined the administration last year. It now emerges that he played a leading role in conjuring the Gibraltar incident out of thin air, effectively using Britain as an unwitting tool to advance his hyper-hawkish Iran agenda.

The marked drift toward diplomacy last week represents an important, potentially decisive setback for Bolton and the White House's hawkish factions. Washington's hawks sustained another blow Saturday, when The New York Times published the astonishing remarks of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's former fire-breathing, often objectionable president who preceded Hassan Rouhani. "He is a businessman and therefore he is capable of calculating cost-benefits and making a decision," the hard-line Ahmadinejad said of Trump in an hour-long telephone interview with the Times. "We say to him, let's calculate the long-term cost-benefit of our two nations and not be shortsighted."

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, center:
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, center: 'Let's not be shortsighted.'
(Image by (Tasnim News Agency, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons))
  Details   DMCA

Hardliner Split

- Advertisement -

There are two remarkable things to note in this unexpected turn in the direction of the mahogany table. It reveals a split among Iran's conservative factions that was hitherto not apparent. If hard-liners are coming to favor negotiations with the U.S., it is plain which direction the wind blows in Tehran.

Second, it is notable that Ahmadinejad proposes a comprehensive settlement that advances bilateral relations beyond the 40 years of animosity that have followed the 1979 revolution deposing Iran's last shah, who enjoyed extravagant American support over nearly three decades. The signal here is not to be missed: Military solutions to long-term crises are less and less effective in an era of emerging powers such as China, Russia and Iran.

There are two other prominent cases demonstrating this point. One is Afghanistan. After 18 years of pointless war, American diplomats have been in direct talks with the Taliban since last October. The latest round, during which the two sides negotiated the withdrawal of U.S. troops, took place in Qatar last month.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Patrick Lawrence Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Patrick Lawrence is a columnist, author, editor, and educator. He has published five books and currently writes foreign affairs commentary for Consortium News and other publications. He served as a correspondent abroad for many years and is also (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Brighter US-Iran Prospects

Finally Time for DNC Email Evidence

Weaponizing the Dollar

The US Moves on Iran's Oil Market as an Expression of an Irrational Foreign Policy

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


David William Pear

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 48 fans, 78 articles, 337 quicklinks, 3557 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Talking is always better than shooting. But don't get your hopes up. The US goal is to bring down Iran's government. Anything else is just deception. Iran is too smart to ever trust the US again.

Further reading:

Iran Should Never Trust a US Promise Again; nor should anybody else!

P.S. The US still has killer sanctions on North Korea. Further reading:

North Korea Can Never Trust the U.S.A.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:57:55 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 2926 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to David William Pear:   New Content

Is there any country in the world the States doesn't have some sort of (illegal) unilateral sanctions on??

Submitted on Tuesday, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:56:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment