Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Anomalies Aboundf in GA6 Runoff

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Garland Favorito     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Interesting 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 7/2/17

Author 23503
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Eleciton Hack
(Image by WRBL Columbus Ga)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

In the recently completed GA6 runoff race last week anomalies abound, the likes of which national election-integrity activists have never seen. In the runoff Karen Handel was declared the winner over Jon Ossoff on Georgia's unverifiable voting equipment by a 51.78% to 48.22% margin. But verifiable voting statistics cry foul. For example:

  • Ossoff won 28,146 verifiable mail-in ballots by a 64%-36% margin

    - Advertisement -
  • Ossoff won the 596 verifiable provisional ballots by a 70-30% margin

  • Ossoff won early voting 51%-49% despite getting 10% less votes than on April 18 when he ran against 17 opponents

  • Ossoff got a lower percentage of votes on June 20th in Fulton and Dekalb than he did when he ran against 17 opponents on April 18th

  • 40 precincts have 60-point total swings between mail-in and Election Day vote (eg: Ossoff mail-in 65-35%, Handel Election Day 65-35%)

    - Advertisement -

In the average of over 200 precincts Ossoff won 60% of the verifiable mail-in but Handel won 60% of the Election Day vote. Only 10 precincts showed Handel winning the verifiable mail-in vote.

There is no rational explanation for the reported election-day results. Or for that matter even the Ossoff early voting percentage decreases when compared to his performance against 17 opponents on April 18th. No significant event occurred in the last week of the campaign. Ossoff would have had to be charged with a crime for his vote percentage to decrease as much as it did. The Ossoff campaign also had a massive, growing canvassing operation funded by out-of-state resources right up until election day. The only explanation seems to be that unverifiable voting defeated unlimited resources!

(Article changed on July 2, 2017 at 23:59)

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Interesting 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Garland Favorito is the co-founder of VoterGA, which was established to restore the integrity of Georgia elections after the state implemented unverifibale voting statewide. He is also the author of Our Nation Betrayed, which, in its second (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Still Looking for the Right Christmas Present?

New Movie Propagates Lincoln Historical Myths

Police Break in, Shoot Woman 3 Times after She Calls 911

Schaefers Killed with Mysterious Gun, GBI Destroys Evidence, Closes "Suicide" Case

The Hidden Story Behind Ferguson Unrest

Big Brother Coming to Georgia