Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
General News

Alliance for Democracy Joins National Cry of Outrage Over U.S. Supreme Court Opinion

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Bonanno     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
- Advertisement -

Waltham, MA January 23 -Thursday's Supreme Court opinion in Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission, a campaign finance law case, opens the floodgates to allow unlimited corporate spending to influence state and federal elections and further entrenches corporate power in our nation.

This 5-4 decision overturns previous Court decisions that limited corporate money in politics. In lifting the previous federal ban on corporate "independent expenditures," the court has overridden laws in 22 states banning "independent expenditures" by corporations and unions. Now corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money to buy the election results they want and manipulate politics and policy in their self-interest.

- Advertisement -

"The Constitution was written to protect real people, not to give corporations the power to challenge our fundamental rights and enacted laws," said NancyPrice, Alliance for Democracy Co-Chair. "With this decision, a business-friendly Supreme Court majority is further eroding the very basis of our democracy by allowing corporate money to dominate the political process. Corporate political speech is a lot louder than that of ordinary persons. This is a critical time for our democracy and many are alarmed."

The Alliance welcomes the observation by Justice Stevens in his dissent with Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor concurring, that

"The conceit that corporations must be treated identically to natural persons in the political sphere is not only inaccurate but also inadequate to justify the Court's disposition of this case."

However, this should apply to all Constitutional rights conferred on corporations by the courts through the doctrine of corporate personhood. It is these court-conferred rights which have robbed, "we, the people" of our ability to govern ourselves without interference by the monied-power of corporations.

- Advertisement -

Corporations are not persons. They are artificial entities. And as Stevens et al make clear,

"Although they make enormous contributions to our society, corporations are not actually members of it. They cannot vote or run for office."

The Supreme Court's expansion of corporate free speech rights under the First Amendment further entrenches corporate power in the law of the land. It is a stunning setback for American democracy and a crime against the rights of ordinary people.

"We join with our grassroots allies in the Campaign to Legalize Democracy in support of an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to remove personhood rights and protections from corporations for all time," Price said, urging that concerned citizens visit the new website and sign in support.

This opinion further entrenches the controversial legal doctrine of "corporate personhood" arising from the 1886 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Santa Clara railroad case. In this decision, the activist court asserted, without explanation, that the 14th Amendment, enacted to guarantee equal protection and constitutional rights to recently freed slaves, applied to corporations. As a result, corporations, artificial entities created by and subject to state laws, have successfully claimed many of the constitutional rights that real persons possess, even though the word "corporation" never appears in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.

Corporations have used the Constitution to challenge the constitutionally recognized rights of human beings, not just the First Amendment right to free speech but other protections under the Bill of Rights and the Constitution itself. The concept of corporate personhood, though absurd on its face, has been slowly gaining momentum since the mid-19th century, as the hard-won Fourteenth Amendment has been used effectively over the decades to expand corporate power rather than to protect the rights of ordinary people. Today's Supreme Court ruling continues this misdirection.

The Alliance calls on the American people to stand up and take back our democracy which has fallen under corporate rule and end this corporate crusade to subvert democratically enacted laws.

- Advertisement -

One step is mandatory public financing of state and federal elections. Another step is aconstitutional amendment to deny corporations First Amendment rights to political speech and to

spend money in elections.

Ultimately, a Constitutional amendment is needed to deny corporate personhood and thereby stripping corporations of all constitutional rights conferred on them piecemeal by the Court over the years.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Teabaggers; Children of the Sixties?

Will "Americans Elect" Their President in 2012?

Why Anarchism, Communism and Libertarianism are Pipe Dreams

It's OK to say "Merry Christmas"

Is The Constitution Really That Unfair?

LA Socialist Party Local Holds Organizing Meeting (Discussion with Mimi Soltysik, Local Chair)