Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
General News

Air Force Stonewalls F-35 Defects

By       Message William Boardman       (Page 1 of 6 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   6 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 12/2/12

Author 14586
Become a Fan
  (34 fans)
- Advertisement -

VERMONT "LEADERS" TURN DEAF EAR TO F-35 NOISE AND HEALTH ISSUES

 


F-35 nuclear-capable stealth fighter
(Image by F-16.net)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

   By William Boardman   Email address removed  

- Advertisement -

 

None of the more notable supporters of basing the nuclear-capable F-35 stealth fighter-bomber at Burlington Airport in Vermont, not one, had the courage to tell the Burlington Board of Health that the F-35 would be good for the community's health.  The available evidence points strongly to the F-35 being bad for people's health. 

 

- Advertisement -

The Board of Health hearing on November 27 heard three health experts, two of whom criticized the plane's health impact, while the third called it "a very murky area."  Of the dozen members of the audience of about 50 who spoke, all objected to the plane's deleterious effects. 

 

The F-35 has faced local opposition for almost three years, opposition that has grown since the U.S. Air Force released a draft environmental impact statement in the spring of 2012, provoking widespread objections to its assumptions, methodology, and conclusions.  To date, the Air Force continues to withhold documents relevant to the criticisms. 

 

The final impact statement is now scheduled for release in mid-January 2013, with the final basing decision expected a month or so later.   If the F-35 is based in Burlington, it's not expected to arrive before 2020, about 20 years since the world's most expensive weapons program -- approaching $400 billion -- began.  So far it is about a decade behind schedule and 100% over budget.   

 

- Advertisement -

The F-35 program has been troubled for years, to the point where some in Washington are looking to cut their losses.  According to the New York Times of November 28, budget cutters are eyeing this expensive program that is still in the testing phase and still years from full deployment.  Two days later the Times reported that the Pantagon had agreed in principle to pay $3.8 billion for 32 F-35s "after a year of tense negotiations over how to lower costs." 

 

Sales of the F-35 continue to face uncertainty as budget-strapped countries have second thoughts, most recently Canada, where officials withheld cost data until after the most recent election.  

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?