Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

A Response to an Unspoken Sentiment

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message j dial
Become a Fan
  (31 fans)

"If we weren't fighting them there... we would be fighting them on our own shores."

Have you heard that one? To be truthful, we haven't been hearing as much of that particular sentiment since the focus of the war has shifted from Iraq to Afghanistan.

But the underlying belief remains the same. Certainly it must; otherwise, what are we doing there? We did invade before we knew of vast mineral wealth there, did we not?

The unspoken belief must be that we are fighting in Afghanistan because there are "insurgents" there who must be contained as they would, if left to their own devices, do us wrong. They are bad guys. That must make us the good guys in this rustic world.

Writing this response to this inchoate belief came to me while reading the excellent article by Dean Hartwell that gave responses to statements one tends to hear from a certain segment of the political spectrum. The "If we weren't fighting them there..." statement seems to me to be a fair argument to address.

Let's begin with our military's current emphasis, in our ongoing Afghanistan adventure, on counterinsurgency, or what the military, which loves acronyms, calls COIN. Much of what we are attempting to accomplish in Afghanistan these days, recently under General Stanley McChrystal and now under his erstwhile boss, General David Petraeus, boils down to this: While engendering as little collateral damage (meaning killed and bloodied innocents, and maybe demolished structures, and other such vexations) as possible, we good guys endeavor to extinguish the violent activities of those we call insurgents.

I have no first-hand knowledge of the origins of this body of insurgents, but neither have I seen evidence that a large percentage, or much of any percentage, in fact, of these people have come to Afghanistan from countries other than Afghanistan. In other words, most of these people are violently resisting and attacking a military from another country that is without their consent occupying their soil. And we call them insurgents.

Perhaps we Americans are not so soft that, were a foreign military to occupy our shores without our consent (and it is difficult to imagine a condition of consent), we too would rise up and perform whatever violent activities we could devise to drive that invader from our shores. Were we to do that I doubt we would consider ourselves insurgents. More likely we would consider ourselves patriots. Wasn't there something back in our history books about our once being in a situation similar to that of the insurgents in Afghanistan, when those of us resisting occupation adopted guerrilla tactics to evade and expel the despised invaders?

But what about al Qaeda? Weren't they the bad guys once? Maybe they are fueling the insurgency.

Probably al Qaeda comprises a portion of the insurgents, and they do indeed mean us harm. That gives us a bit of more complication in our black hat/white hat movie. We have on one hand an organization sworn to do us grievous harm, and on the other citizens enraged at our invasion of their country. But we won't let that little bit of complexity complicate our plan. We are the strongest country in the world, the one and only superpower, and no backwards third-world mix of bedraggled guerrillas can prevail against our might.

But does the way we are pursuing our amalgam of enemies make much sense? Does al Qaeda in any way distinguish itself from the other unbranded guerrillas defending their country? Do the guerrillas themselves distinguish themselves from non-fighters? Of course not. And here we are, playing the part of the British in the Revolutionary War as we march--now propel our heavily armored hummers and tanks--through towns and villages and pastures, as subtle as an aircraft carrier among sailboats, seeking our guerrilla quarry and dismayed when they don't reveal themselves like targets in a practice field.

I recently read that there are about two hundred active members of al Qaeda on this planet. As we motor and tank our way through the countryside of Afghanistan seeking insurgents or al Qaeda or whomever, sometimes finding worthy targets and maybe avoiding the same fate while regrettably leaving a few mangled civilians as well in our demolished and fume-filled wake, should we really be surprised, first, that we will never know if or when we kill the last living member of al Qaeda, and, second, that we are ever breeding more and more so-called insurgents with every passing day and every shot and violated civilian?

Of course, we have methods other than shouldering our armored way through provincial crowds to gather our information about who is insurgent, or who al Qaeda. For a long time it was interrogation of the captured, but now of course it is torture.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

J Dial Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Schooled in psychology and biomedical illustration, of course I became a medical writer!

In 2014 my husband and I and our kitty moved from Colorado, where Jerry had been born, to Canada, where I had been. (Born.)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Turned Scientific American?

Seeds of destruction: It's NOT just about food

Who the Frack's Really in Charge?

Fracking: Water Issues--Colorado-centric, but applicable to all

Why Barack Obama Does Not Disappoint Some Folks

Where Have all the Finches Gone?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend