Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 9/11/19

A 9-11 Retrospective: Possible Explanations for the Behavior of Pres. George W. Bush, in re 9-11

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     (# of views)   4 comments
Author 50778
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Jonas
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)

"Either this nation shall kill racism, or racism shall kill this nation" (S. Jonas, August, 2018)

Introduction

As is well known, today is the 18th anniversary of the awful tragedy of 9-11, and subsequent events which would not have happened if it had not happened. They will linger with us for decades both in the memories of the lives lost in destruction on the day, and in the shortened lives of First Responders and the demolition crews who were not properly protected at Ground Zero. It will also linger with us in the aftermath of the War on Iraq, which may well have never occurred if not for "9-11." These are matters that I have visited on more than one occasion on OpEdNews and other sites as well. This year, with very slight editing, I am reposting a column that I wrote for the now long-gone poltical website, "The Poltical Junkies." It raises many questions about what really happened and why, many of which have yet to be fully answered.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Retrospective

The Political Junkies.net; MAY 6, 2004 UPDATE: Column No. 11; Noting that The War on Iraq was Begun on 3/19/2003

Despite the swirl of revelations over the past months, the public remains facing a large set of unanswered 9/11 questions, glaring inconsistencies, and seeming lies-at-the-time and very possibly lies now, combined with a drive by the Georgites to withhold as much information as possible (cover-up, anyone?). Only extreme political pressure can force further key disclosures.

The subject of this writing is not a comprehensive review of that data. As a follow-through to the "Condi Rice Testimony" column published on 4/22/04, I will present here just a few prime issues that have raised unanswered questions. The subject of this column is to take a look at possible explanations for the Georgite (my term for the George W. Bush Administration) response concerning events and non-events before, during, and after 9/11. Doing so is in the hope that someday, sooner rather than later of course (and hopefully before the next election), the true story will be revealed. Please note that I wrote this piece on April 19, 2004, so that any information revealed after that date does not play into it.

President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump with former President George W. Bush and former First Lady Laura Bush.  Just think.  Someone worse actually came along.
President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump with former President George W. Bush and former First Lady Laura Bush. Just think. Someone worse actually came along.
(Image by The White House)
  Details   DMCA

First, let's see a few examples of what we do know about specific information the Georgites had and what they did with it -- and some of the resulting actions they did and did not take. They are presented here not necessarily in either chronological order or in order of importance.

There's the famous August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) that seems to contain some very strong warnings of what eventually happened, well beyond what Rice described as "historical" information (and speaking as a sometime historian, what's wrong with that anyway, if it prompts understanding the present?)

There's the apparent fact that Attorney General John Ashcroft told Thomas Pickard, Acting Director of the FBI in the summer of 2001, not to bother him with talk about terrorism and counter-terrorism, while at the same time Ashcroft stopped flying on commercial flights. There's the famous quote from former national security advisor Richard Clarke about Bush, immediately post-9/11 asking him/telling him to find a connection between bin Laden and Saddam. As Rice and the rest of the White House media operation claimed, when placed in the context of what Bob Woodward, once a Georgite fair-haired boy, is telling us in his new book (Bush at War) about how early, and secretly, Bush started planning the Iraq pre-emptive war, that now doesn't look quite so possibly "made up,".

There's Bush, according to Sidney Blumenthal in The Guardian (UK, April 15, 2004), "Hear no evil, read no evil, speak drivel," not reading anything; whether it's his PDBs or a 17 volume State Department report entitled "The Future of Iraq." It happened to have warned of nearly all the post-Iraq war pitfalls that have been encountered. Bush just listened to what certain of his advisors told him or worse yet, what the real decision-makers, if they are not he, had already decided to do but were kind enough to let him in on.

Just in case any reader doesn't agree with my position that Bush really believes the religious doctrines he says he stands by and for, as quoted by Blumenthal, Bush said, "I also have this belief, strong belief that freedom is not this country's gift to the world. Freedom is the Almighty's gift to every man and woman in the world. And as the greatest power on the face of the earth, we have an obligation to help the spread of freedom." I should note that I am writing this column at a time when Bush is going around the country plumping to make the Patriot Act permanent. Apparently, he believes that he can sell "freedom" abroad, by force, of course, while taking it away right here at home. One must wonder what the Iraqis think about the example of what the "freedom" is that the Georgites are trying to sell to them/force-down-their-throats at the barrel of a gun.

Then there's all the background about the Georgites trying to prevent the formation of the 9/11 Commission in the first place, then under-funding it, then not cooperating with it at all until forced to do so, then cooperating with it as little as possible, and so on. (For example, Bush agreed to be interviewed by the Commission only not under the oath and only in the company of Dick Cheney.) That is combined with the peculiar non-reaction of the U.S. Air Defenses (NORAD) system on 9/11 once it was known, and it was known very early on, that at least one of the planes that eventually crashed into the Twin Towers had been high-jacked that awful morning.

Plus, there's the Great Commander continuing to read to school children after being informed of the first collision of plane with building, and then spending the rest of the day flying around the country on Air Force One. Then there is the mystery of assisting, on 9/12, all those Saudis, including members of bin Laden's family, to fly out of the country during a time when nothing else was flying in U.S. airspace. The litany could go on.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Steven Jonas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at StonyBrookMedicine (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 35 books. In addition to his position on OpEdNews as a "Trusted Author," he is a Senior Editor, (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   



You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments  Post Comment


Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 123 quicklinks, 4453 comments, 214 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

#NewStudy - The University of Alaska Fairbanks WTC 7 Report concludes that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fire but rather by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

There were no "nineteen hijackers" or "terrorists" from anywhere in the world who could have come to New York City at exactly 5:20 PM on 9/11 to "pull down" Building 7 in 6.5 seconds - had to be "someone with access" to all "three towers" who knew "how to do it. "II. The controlled demolition, therefore, had to be the work of insiders".

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:07:22 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

911TRUTH

Become a Fan
Author 15356

(Member since Apr 29, 2008), 28 fans, 2677 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Lance Ciepiela:   New Content

I sent The University of Alaska Fairbanks WTC 7 Report link to the local TV station and asked them to report on it.

I'm not holding my breath.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:39:42 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 123 quicklinks, 4453 comments, 214 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to 911TRUTH:   New Content

Not wondering at all what Democrat Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer will do with the "link" to the "Report" that I sent him via a "Tweet" - oh, he might say he "hasn't heard about that building 7" but yes send "more info" so his office can "take a look"?

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:45:18 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

911TRUTH

Become a Fan
Author 15356

(Member since Apr 29, 2008), 28 fans, 2677 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Lance Ciepiela:   New Content

That's the same thing Biden said when he was confronted in person in a video I saw at one point. They have their 9/11 talking points memorized perfectly, don't they?

I sent the link to several friends, only two replied. One who knows the official story is BS and another, a HS history teacher in Chicago, who won't accept it and said it was just 'interesting.' He completely mistrusts the government on everything except this.

It's truly amazing why people won't even question this.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:11:24 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment