Nothing in Senate Bill SBx2-11 cures this problem. In fact, Senate Bill SBx2-11 reinstates the county benefits effective May 21, 2009 "on the same terms and conditions as existed on July 1, 2008." It further states that the counties may stop the payments upon 180-days notice, which might be less than the "same terms and conditions".
Additionally, the L.A. County's proposed budget for fiscal year 2010-2011, in the section entitled "Trial Court Operations", shows that the L.A. County payments of judicial benefits to judges are based upon the 1997 Lockyer-Isenberg Trial Court Funding Act. This reference demonstrates that the payments are illegal, irrespective of Senate Bill SBx2-11, which is not cited in the budget. The 1997 Lockyer-Isenberg Trial Court Funding Act was held to not "prescribe" compensation for judges and was held to be in violation of Article VI, Section 19, of the California Constitution in Sturgeon, supra. (See the last four paragraphs of the Sturgeon case.)
In conclusion, it appears that Mr. Green's final words of "charges of gross abuse and distortion of the legal system" aptly apply to his letter and the misconceived charges, alleged wrongful facts and deviation from long-established legal precedent contained therein.
Unfortunately, Mr. Green, a Professor of Philosophy and a clinical psychologist for the L.A. Superior Courts, became "confused" as he attempted to apply these disciplines to the hard facts of the L.A. Superior Court judges', particularly Judge Yaffe, taking bribes from L.A. County and committing "fraud upon the court" by not disclosing such and not disqualifying himself from presiding over cases in which L.A. County was a party before him.
Mr. Green's sense of morality and ethics, being a Professor of Philosophy, may also be disrupted by Judge Yaffe's conduct of protecting his illegal actions by throwing me in jail in violation of every law, and moral and ethical principal.
Mr. Green may also be aggravated by the "cronyism" of the District Court, the Ninth Circuit, and the Supreme Court in protecting Judge Yaffe's illegal conduct and violating the constitutional right to due process of a fair trial by an impartial judge.
It is understandable that Mr. Green is aggravated; however, his anger should be directed at Judge Yaffe and the L.A. Superior Court judges who took the bribes, the L.A. County Supervisors who gave the bribes, and the federal judges who protected them.
Sincerely,
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
